Canada to proceed with Meng extradition
Huawei exec to appear in B.C. court next week
• The federal Justice Department ordered Friday the start of extradition hearings against Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou, raising tensions in the high- profile case that has lodged Canada between two superpowers. Canada’s relationship with China — its second-biggest trading partner — has deteriorated since Meng’s December arrest in Vancouver.
Beijing has warned Ottawa of serious consequences unless the Chinese telecom giant’s chief financial officer is released.
It has criticized Canada for acting on what it sees as a politically motivated extradition request from the Americans, particularly after U.S. President Donald Trump publicly contemplated intervening in Meng’s case in the interests of securing a better trade deal with China. Throughout, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has maintained Canada is simply following the rule of law. The government news release Friday announcing the decision appeared to take into consideration the deeply sensitive nature of Meng’s case and the allegations of political interference that surround it. The first line in the release declares: “Canada is a country governed by the rule of law.”
It goes on to say the decision follows a “thorough and diligent review” of the evidence in this case. Ultimately, Justice Minister David Lametti must decide whether Meng is extradited, which is why his department said he will not comment on the facts of the case. Meng, who is out of bail and living in one of her two Vancouver mansions, is to appear in B.C. Supreme Court on Wednesday to set a date for the hearing.
The extradition hearing won’t render a verdict of guilt or innocence. If Meng is eventually extradited, her actual trial will take place in the United States.
The U. S. alleges she lied to banks to trick them into processing transactions for Huawei that potentially violated Iran trade sanctions. Meng’s defence team said it’s disappointed Lametti let the process proceed “in the face of the political nature of the U. S. charges and where the president of the United States has repeatedly stated that he would interfere in Ms. Meng’s case if he thought it would assist the U. S. negotiations with China over a trade deal.”
The statement, signed by David J. Martin, continued by saying the defence is also concerned the minister gave his approval even though the acts the U.S. wants to try Meng for would not be an offence in Canada.
“Our client maintains that she is innocent of any wrongdoing and that the U.S. prosecution and extradition constitutes an abuse of the processes of law.”
The U. S. Department of Justice has laid out 13 criminal counts of conspiracy, fraud and obstruction against Huawei and Meng, who is the daughter of company founder Ren Zhengfei. The Chinese Embassy in Ottawa said it is “utterly dissatisfied” with Friday’s decision, calling her case “a political persecution against a Chinese high- tech enterprise.”
“The subsequent developments have proved this,” the embassy said. “The so-called ‘ rule of law’ and ‘ judicial independence’ asserted by Canada cannot cover up the mistakes made by the Canadian side on the case of Meng Wanzhou.” Allegations levelled against Trudeau and top officials of interfering in the prosecution of engineering firm SNC-Lavalin have caught the attention of the Chinese government. Former attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould testified this week that she faced relentless pressure — and even veiled threats — to help SNC-Lavalin avoid a criminal trial.
A spokesman for China’s foreign ministry told reporters in Beijing that there is a lot of interest in China in how the Canadian government responds to the allegations.
Lu Kang made the comments after being asked whether he thought the Trudeau government was taking an inconsistent approach in the cases of Meng and SNCLavalin.
“I believe fair- minded people can tell right from wrong,” Lu said Friday during the ministry’s daily news conference. The ministry posts English transcripts of its briefings regularly. On Thursday, Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland insisted Ottawa’s handling of the Meng case has been “scrupulous.” “Decisions that are correctly taken at the official — i.e. non-political — level have been scrupulously taken at the official non-political level and there has been no interference,” Freeland told CBC Radio.