Windsor Star

KEEP ON MOVIN'

What is the `active grandparen­t hypothesis' and what does it say about health and longevity?

- AMBY BURFOOT For The Washington Post

By one narrow view of Darwinian theory, grandparen­ts are virtually useless. After all, they don't produce many babies, and that's all evolution cares about — passing down helpful genes to the next generation.

But don't jump off a cliff, Grandma and Grandpa. A broader view recognizes your key role in intergener­ational survival. It also suggests, according to a new paper from a team of Harvard researcher­s, that you should be getting more exercise to align your modern body with your evolutiona­ry history.

This view comes from a Perspectiv­e paper published in Proceeding­s of the National Academy of Sciences. The paper is titled The active grandparen­t hypothesis: Physical activity and the evolution of extended human healthspan­s and lifespans. It posits that modern-day Westerners engage in much less physical activity than earlier humans, and that this “mismatch” leads to many chronic diseases once rare in humans.

One of the authors of the active grandparen­t hypothesis (AGH) is evolutiona­ry biologist Daniel Lieberman, known for his role in the Born to Run thesis (which suggests endurance running had a role in human evolution). Another is I-min Lee, a professor of epidemiolo­gy recognized worldwide for her multi-decade research with large groups and recent papers that measure physical activity.

The AGH is based largely on observatio­ns of hunter-gatherer tribes such as the Hadza of northern Tanzania, and on activity patterns of animals closely related to humans, such as chimpanzee­s. Chimps don't move much, but the Hadza do. Therefore, something happened in our evolutiona­ry past that changed us from sitters to movers, and the change was powerful enough to be passed along as an important survival trait.

Literally thousands of scientific papers have closely linked exercise in humans to health and long life. Moreover, according to the AGH: “The older one gets, the more physical activity matters.”

The comparativ­e statistics between human groups across the millennia are striking. The Hadza spend four to six hours a day in moderate to vigorous activity, as their ancestors likely did. Current U.S. exercise guidelines recommend 2.5 hours a week of such activity. Hadza adults have an overweight-obesity prevalence of about two per cent. In the U.S. this figure has soared above 70 per cent.

The Hadza also remain active in old age, when Westerners typically head for the car and the couch. Hadza grandmothe­rs are particular­ly impressive. They forage more than their daughters, who are usually busy caring for several youngsters. The food supplied by grandmothe­rs helps sustain the extended family. Without it, the family might wither and die.

“The paper does a great job summarizin­g that old age may have evolved in humans along with a highly active lifestyle,” says David Raichlen, a University of Southern California professor of human and evolutiona­ry biology who is not associated with the new publicatio­n. “It shows that the harmful effects of inactivity seem to be greater in older compared to younger adults.”

To appreciate the AGH, you must understand one widely held but inaccurate assumption about the reason that early humans did not live as long as modern humans. While they died, on average, at a younger age than we do today, these deaths were not caused by unhealthy adult lifestyles. They were the result of high infant mortality rates and childhood infections, which have been largely eliminated by modern medicine.

Today, most elderly Hadza rarely suffer from chronic conditions, while 88 per cent of Americans aged 65 and older have at least one chronic condition, including 64 per cent with two or more.

Lieberman, Lee and their co-authors offer two main explanatio­ns for the good health of ancient grandparen­ts. The first is simple and widely understood. The second is novel, little-discussed outside research circles, and biological­ly complex.

The first reason is that regular exercise burns lots of calories, helping to keep us lean and fit. It diverts food energy away from body fat, especially the pernicious visceral fat that releases inflammato­ry cytokines into the bloodstrea­m. Excess fat and chronic inflammati­on are linked to major illnesses such as heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure and cancer. Exercise counters the developmen­t of fat and inflammati­on, as most of us recognize, and as scientists constantly affirm.

“In my almost three decades investigat­ing physical activity and health, it is astounding to see how regular activity helps maintain good health and function, both physically and mentally,” Lee said.

At the same time, it's also undeniable that exercise produces short-term damage that manifests as muscle soreness and tiredness — consider how you feel the day after hard session in the gym or your first day of serious lawn work each spring. Ouch! But a day or two later, the muscle soreness disappears, and you are stronger and healthier for your efforts.

This cause-and-effect sequence has long been recognized in the vernacular. Fitness fanatics are fond of saying “Use it or lose it,” and more than a century ago Friedrich Nietzsche wrote, “What does not kill me makes me stronger.” These expression­s now appear to hold at least a kernel of truth. However, they have lacked biological explicatio­n, until now.

In their paper, Lieberman and his colleagues call the damage-turns-intogrowth miracle the “activity paradox,” and theorize that the health-enhancing response is controlled by a many-pronged “repair and maintenanc­e” process.

When you exercise, your cardiac output is three to four times higher than when at rest. The body takes note, and turns on repair-and-maintenanc­e mechanisms in various systems, including the muscles, the cartilage, the microbiome and the internal antioxidan­t system. The repair and maintenanc­e doesn't just return the body to its prior homeostasi­s, however, but leads to improved healthfuln­ess. Thus, the second reason that ancient grandparen­ts lived long lives.

You won't necessaril­y develop biceps like Popeye or Olympic potential like Usain Bolt if you regularly force your body to go into the repair and maintenanc­e response. But the combined effect on health and longevity of so many biological reactions is real and measurable. Lieberman says: “We have yet to see any small bit of physical activity that doesn't promote repair and maintenanc­e.”

Lack of exercise has opposite effects that lead to disease and breakdown. Lieberman likens the pace of these effects to the slow drip-drip-drip of stalactite formations on a cave's ceiling. Each tiny little change is so small that the body barely perceives it. “By the time they are apparent,” he says, “it's too late to repair them.”

In his book Exercised, released last spring, Lieberman describes a day in the life of the Hadza, which hasn't changed much in millennia. It's tough. Soon after dawn, the males head out to hunt and perhaps to chase honeybees from their hives. The women search for tubers and berries.

“Finding a good place to dig sometimes involves an hour-long trek,” he writes. “Digging is arduous work because many tubers hide several feet deep under rocks that must be pried out.”

The ancient farmers who came to predominat­e after most of the tribes like the Hadza disappeare­d didn't have it any easier. Studies have shown they likely burned as many or more calories per day than hunter-gatherers. You had to be moving and/or hoeing and digging most of the day. If you weren't, your clan might not survive.

Human life changed little until the Industrial Revolution that began less than 300 years ago. The Computer Age of the past 50 years produced unpreceden­ted social shocks. Suddenly, you could better provide for your family by staring at a screen all day than through farming or factory labour. But the trade-off too often is infirmity in old age. And most grandparen­ts don't want to live to 100 if it means dealing with debilitati­ng illness for 30 years.

Lieberman and Lee's hypothesis shows that this is possible, but you'll have to move.

“It's great if someone can achieve 10,000 steps a day,” Lee said, “but we now clearly know there are health benefits at lower levels, even 5,000 steps. We don't live under the conditions faced by the Hadza, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't move like the Hadza. We should.”

Lieberman goes even further. “Exercise is medicine, but we can't prescribe a simple dose for everyone,” he says. “The most important message is that something is better than nothing. Just move more.”

 ?? GETTY IMAGES/ISTOCKPHOT­O ?? “The older one gets, the more physical activity matters,” according to the active grandparen­t hypothesis, or the AGH.
GETTY IMAGES/ISTOCKPHOT­O “The older one gets, the more physical activity matters,” according to the active grandparen­t hypothesis, or the AGH.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada