Canadian ratio contentious in Cfl-union negotiations

With revenue and full season on the line, pressure is on players to accept a deal

Think of a collective bargaining agreement between the Canadian Football League and the CFL Players Association as a Jenga tower.

The one at issue currently is made up of about 25 negotiated items, or blocks if you will; some administrative, some financial, some health and safety. Remove an administrative block here or there with little or no risk, add it to the top of the teetering pile and finish your turn unscathed.

But touch the wrong one — in this case the foundational Canadian ratio block, painted bright red and white — and the entire thing goes down in a heap.

That's where the CFL and the players find themselves for the second time in a week, on the precipice of another disastrous collapse. This one was set in motion by an overwhelming player rejection of the previous tentative agreement for a seven-year CBA. The bargaining committees for the players and the league had come to an understanding last week on those 25 issues, give or take. Some were safe bets, others were not. Painted red and white as it was, the Canadian ratio stood out to some as a potential problem, and sure enough a majority of players looked right past the massive concessions received on revenue sharing and salary cap, guaranteed contracts, medical benefits, term and expiry date, to focus mostly on the ratio. And they didn't like what they saw.

“It wasn't close,” one source said when asked about the player vote.

The absence of a ratification bonus became an issue too. It's essentially enticement money paid directly to the CFLPA membership in exchange for their approval of the deal. It is often considered a consolation prize; upfront money for accepting a CBA that wasn't as good as it might otherwise have been.

In this case, the players' bargaining committee had carved out what looked like a stellar package that took care of future Cflers, but it did not include a ratification bonus, and that mattered to some players. Not as much as the ratio, perhaps, but enough to cause discomfort.

On Tuesday, CFL commissioner Randy Ambrosie said the league addressed both of those issues in a new and final proposal to the players that must be approved by Thursday at midnight.

“This accomplished what everyone thought we needed to do,” said Ambrosie. “We needed to find a way to set up the league and the players for long-term success and we've done that. There comes a point where you just have to stop tinkering, but in the spirit of good faith our bargaining committee thought there were two last adjustments they could accommodate.”

The league believes it has done enough to avoid a devastating work stoppage by addressing the two prime player concerns.

“We did a little moving of the furniture, took some money away from the back end where we believe our revenue sharing formula will outperform, and moved it into a $1-million pool of ratification money,” said Ambrosie.

A source said it will amount to about $2,000 per player, shared equally by the nine teams. That's not insignificant money to some players who have lost 22 game cheques to a cancelled 2020 season and a shortened 2021 campaign. However, it essentially gives future player money to current veterans, and while that might be enticing to some, surely others will see past their own bottom lines to what will be good for the league years from now.

But the more contentious issue is the Canadian ratio. The league started with the hardest of hard lines — no protection at all — and walked it back through the course of negotiations to a complicated formula that allowed for three nationalized Americans, all designated imports, to take up to 49 per cent of the snaps for the seven Canadian starters. It preserved the Canadian starters' game-time bonuses, but was seen as a significant erosion of the ratio. The final offer is for one nationalized American to be able to play as one of the seven Canadian starters.