Ques­tions over Rus­sia plague U.S. pres­i­dent

Winnipeg Free Press - - I WORLD NEWS - DAR­LENE SU­PERVILLE AND JONATHAN LEMIRE

WASH­ING­TON — It wasn’t the week­end that U.S. Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump wanted: largely alone at the White House, irked by a pair of star­tling Rus­sia head­lines and baf­fled that he’s not get­ting more credit for stay­ing put dur­ing the par­tial gov­ern­ment shut­down.

Trump sur­prised his aides by de­cid­ing, with just a few hours’ no­tice, to call in to Jea­nine Pirro’s show on Fox News on Satur­day night to push back against cov­er­age of his pres­i­dency on mul­ti­ple fronts, par­tic­u­larly pub­lished re­ports about his ap­proach to­ward Rus­sia.

Even then, the pres­i­dent avoided directly an­swer­ing when Pirro asked whether he cur­rently is or has ever worked for Rus­sia. The ques­tion came af­ter The New York Times re­ported that law en­force­ment of­fi­cials be­gan in­ves­ti­gat­ing, in 2017, whether Trump had been work­ing on be­half of Rus­sia against U.S. in­ter­ests. The news­pa­per said the in­ves­ti­ga­tion came af­ter the pres­i­dent’s fir­ing of FBI di­rec­tor James Comey.

“I think it’s the most in­sult­ing thing I’ve ever been asked,” Trump told Pirro, a per­sonal friend. “I think it’s the most in­sult­ing ar­ti­cle I’ve ever had writ­ten, and if you read the ar­ti­cle you’ll see that they found ab­so­lutely noth­ing.”

Trump went on to as­sert that no pres­i­dent has taken a harder stance against Rus­sia than he has.

“If you ask the folks in Rus­sia, I’ve been tougher on Rus­sia than any­body else, any other... prob­a­bly any other pres­i­dent, pe­riod, but cer­tainly the last three or four pres­i­dents,” he said.

White House aides ex­pressed re­gret that the pres­i­dent did not more clearly and force­fully deny be­ing a Rus­sian agent when asked by the usu­ally friendly Fox News host, ac­cord­ing to three White House aides and Repub­li­cans close to the White House. The three spoke on con­di­tion of anonymity be­cause they were not au­tho­rized to dis­cuss pri­vate con­ver­sa­tions.

Trump also ob­jected to a re­port in The Wash­ing­ton Post that said he went to ex­tra­or­di­nary lengths to con­ceal de­tails of his con­ver­sa­tions with Rus­sian Pres­i­dent Vladimir Putin even from high-rank­ing of­fi­cials in his own ad­min­is­tra­tion. The re­port cited un­named cur­rent and for­mer U.S. of­fi­cials.

In the Fox News in­ter­view, Trump ques­tioned why the news­pa­per made such a “big deal” out of his dis­cus­sions with Putin in Helsinki last sum­mer. “Any­body could have lis­tened to that meet­ing, that meet­ing is up for grabs.”

Trump’s claim that he’s been tough on Rus­sia was dis­puted Sun­day by Vir­ginia Sen. Mark Warner, the top Demo­crat on the Se­nate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee. The se­na­tor said al­most all the sanc­tions on Rus­sia arose not in the White House but in Con­gress, due to con­cerns by mem­bers of both par­ties about Moscow’s ac­tions. Warner ac­cused the White House of be­ing very slow to put in place the penal­ties.

The Times re­ported that FBI agents and some top of­fi­cials be­came sus­pi­cious of Trump’s ties to Rus­sia dur­ing the 2016 pres­i­den­tial cam­paign but didn’t open an in­ves­ti­ga­tion at that time be­cause they weren’t sure how to ap­proach such a sen­si­tive probe.

Trump’s be­hav­iour in the days around Comey’s May 2017 fir­ing helped trig­ger the coun­ter­in­tel­li­gence part of the probe, ac­cord­ing to the news­pa­per.

In the in­quiry, coun­ter­in­tel­li­gence in­ves­ti­ga­tors sought to eval­u­ate whether Trump was a po­ten­tial threat to na­tional se­cu­rity. They also sought to de­ter­mine whether Trump was de­lib­er­ately work­ing for Rus­sia or had un­in­ten­tion­ally been in­flu­enced by Moscow.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada

© PressReader. All rights reserved.