ACTA Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis
京津冀居民生活用煤“煤改电”政策的健康与经济效益评估
的过早死亡和60.78万例致病案例, 对应的健康效益分别约为408亿元和 5.61亿元。电采暖替代技术和新增电力来源的不同对3个地区空气质量改善和健康效益影响的差异不显著。
3) 结合政策实施的成本, 居民生活“煤改电”政策可以给京津冀区域带来显著的社会净效益。北京市和天津市实施政策能获得净效益, 而河北省存在净损失。最大净效益(最小净损失)的“煤改电”政策实现方式在3个地区间也存在差异。北京市和河北省宜采用“空气源热泵+可再生能源供电”, 天津市则应采用“蓄热式电暖器+可再生能源供电”。在3个地区各自最大化净效益情景下, 京津冀区域整体净效益约为 203.41 亿元。
参考文献
[1] 北京市环境保护局. 2016年北京市环境状况公报, 2017 [2] 天津市环境保护局. 2016年天津市环境状况公报, 2017 [3] 河北省环境保护厅. 2016年河北省环境状况公报, 2017 [4] 江亿, 唐孝炎, 倪维斗, 等. 北京 PM2.5与冬季采暖热源的关系及治理措施. 中国能源, 2014, 36(1): 7– 13 [5] Zhi G, Zhang Y, Sun J, et al. Village energy survey reveals missing rural raw coal in northern China: significance in science and policy. Environmental Pollution, 2017, 223: 705–712 [6] 蒋建云, 章永洁, 叶建东, 等. 北京农村地区燃煤供暖替代技术方案实效对比. 暖通空调, 2016, 46 (9): 51–55 [7] 清华大学建筑节能研究中心. 中国建筑节能年度发展研究报告. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2016 [8] 《中国电力年鉴》编辑委员会. 2016中国电力年鉴. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2016 [9] Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. GBD compare data visualization. Seattle: IHME, University of Washington, 2017 [10] 刘俊. 京津冀地区大气污染减排与健康效益[D].北京: 北京大学, 2015 [11] Liu J, Mauzerall D L, Chen Q, et al. Air pollutant emissions from Chinese households: a major and underappreciated ambient pollution source. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, 113(28): 7756–7761 [12] 黄德生, 张世秋. 京津冀地区控制PM2.5污染的健康效益评估. 中国环境科学, 2013, 33(1): 166–174 [13] Jeuland M A, Pattanayak S K. Benefits and costs of improved cookstoves: assessing the implications of variability in health, forest and climate impacts. Plos One, 2012, 7(2): e30338 [14] Xie Y, Dai H, Dong H, et al. Economic impacts from PM2.5 pollution-related health effects in China: a provincial-level analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(9): 4836–4843 [15] 谢杨, 戴瀚程, 花岡達也, 等. PM2.5污染对京津冀地区人群健康影响和经济影响. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(11): 19–27 [16] Jin Y, Andersson H, Zhang S. China’s cap on coal and the efficiency of local interventions: a benefitcost analysis of phasing out coal in power plants and in households in Beijing. Journal of Benefit-cost Analysis, 2017, 8(2): 1–40 [17] Amann M, Bertok I, Borken J, et al. GAINS-ASIA: a tool to combat air pollution and climate change simultaneously. Laxenburg, 2008 [18] Burnett R T, Rd P C, Ezzati M, et al. An integrated risk function for estimating the global burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2014, 122(4): 397–403 [19] Ii C A P, Burnett R T, Thun M J, et al. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fineparticulate air pollution. JAMA, 2002, 287(9): 1132–1141 [20] 靳雅娜. 健康风险价值评估与空气污染控制策略——基于离散选择与成本效益分析的方法与应用研究[D]. 北京: 北京大学, 2017 [21] Cameron T A. Valuing morbidity in environmental benefit-cost analysis. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2014, 6(1): 249–272 [22] Hao Y, Pizzol M, Xu L. External costs of PM2.5 pollution in Beijing, China: uncertainty analysis of multiple health impacts and costs. Environmental Pollution, 2017, 226: 356–369 [23] 张了. 小型低温空气源热泵采暖在北京农村的适用性研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2015 [24] Jeuland M, Pattanayak S K, Bluffstone R. The economics of household air pollution. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2015, 7(1): 81–108