The Research on the Synergic Development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei IOT Industry Based on the Shared Growth

China Business and Market - - CHINA BUSINESS AND MARKET - GAO Su-ying,LIU Hong-bo and ZHANG Ye


[5]CHANG H-H,MISHRA N,LIN C-C.IOT Big-Data centred knowledge granule analytic and cluster framework for bi ap⁃ plications:a case base analysis[J].Plos one,2015,10(11): 1-23.

[6]LEE I,LEE K.The internet of thing(iot):application,invest⁃ ment,and challenges for enterprises[J].Business horizons, 2015,58(4):431-440. [7]范鹏飞,焦裕乘,黄卫东.物联网业务形态研究[J].中国软

科学,2011,26(6):57-64. [8]罗仲伟,邢云鹏.物联网产业的发展模式探索——基于中

经汇通的案例分析[J].宏观经济研究,2010,33(12):24-29. [9]欧阳桃花,武光.基于朗坤与联创案例的中国农业物联网

企业商业模式研究[J].管理学报,2013,10(3):336-346. [10]吴瑞坚.网络化治理视角下的协调机制研究——以广佛

同城化为例[J].城市发展研究,2014,21(1):108-113. [11]欧阳峣,张亚斌,易先忠.中国与金砖国家外贸的“共享

式”增长[J].中国社会科学,2012,33(10):67-85. [12]孙虎,乔标.京津冀产业协同发展的问题及建议[J].中国

软科学,2015,30(7):68-74. [13]孙喜民,刘客.基于系统动力学的煤炭企业产业协同效

应研究[J].资源科学,2015,37(3):555-564. [14]彭继增,孙中美,黄昕.基于灰色关联理论的产业结构与经济协同发展的实证分析[J].经济地理,2015,35(8): 123-128. [15]高维和,史珏琳.全球城市文化资源配置力评价指标体系研究及五大城市实证评析[J].上海经济研究,2015,34 (5):53-61. [16]李虹,张希源.区域生态创新协同度及其影响因素研究


[17]ROSA M,BELOBORODKO A.A decision support method for development of industrial synergies:case stdudies of lat⁃ vian brewery and wood- processing industries[J].Journal of cleaner production,2015,105(10):461-470. [18]赵弘.京津冀协同发展的核心和关键问题[J].中国流通经

济,2014,28(12):20-24. [19]解学梅,刘丝雨.协同创新模式对协同效应与创新绩效

的影响机理[J].管理科学,2015,29(2):27-39. [20]周晓唯,杨露.基于主成分聚类分析的我国物联网产业发展潜力评价研究[J].华东经济管理,2012,37(26):2732. [21]岳中刚,侯赞慧.物联网产业运行机制与发展策略研究

[J].中国科技论坛,2014,30(1):62-68. [22]张治栋,唐宏骏.物联网产业协同创新模型与运行机制

研究[J].科技管理研究,2015,35(8):1-5. [23]李敬,陈澍,万广华,等.中国区域经济增长的空间关联及其解释——基于网络分析方法[J].经济研究,2014,60 (11):4-16.


(Hebei Technology of University,Tianjin300401,China)

Abstract:In the era of“internet everything intellectually”,to better promote the integrated development of Beijing-TianjinHebei,we should make the overall top design of the Internet of Things (IOT) industry to determine the function position of these three different regions,and integrate the industrial resources to realize the synergic development. We should first establish the evaluation index system of synergy of IOT industry to better measure the synergic degree of the IOT industry in Beijing-TianjinHebei. Analysis on the data of listed IOT companies in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei from 2010 to 2016 shows that synergic degree of IOT industry in Beijing,Tianjin and Hebei is low. The order degree and scale of IOT in Beijing is comparatively high,but the level of perception manufacturing and application service should be better improved in the future;the application service is well developed in Tianjin,but perception manufacturing and communication infrastructure is the future development direction of Tianjin;and perception manufacturing,application service,scale and the capability for R&D is the future development direction of Hebei. The synergic degree of IOT industry in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei is unstably rising,but the overall level is still very low. The fluctuation of synergic degree of Bei-Tianjin and Tianjin-Hebei is significant,and the difficulty in promoting the synergic degree of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei is also significant. Because of the influencing role of the mutual function and matching among different subsystems on the effectiveness of the overall system,to promote the orderly development of IOT industry in BeijingTianjin-Hebei,we should rationally formulate the synergic development strategy for this region,and realize the shared growth by overcoming the shortage in the development of IOT industry in this region,formulating the strategic plan,building industrial bases,and establishing cooperation alliance.

Key words:internet of things industry (IOT);synergic degree;regional industrial synergy;shared growth

Newspapers in Chinese (Simplified)

Newspapers from China

© PressReader. All rights reserved.