The Regulation Dilemma and Countermeasures of Anti-unfair Competition Law of Data Capture Behavior
[4]游涛，计莉卉.使用网络爬虫获取数据行为的刑事责任认定——以“晟品公司”非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪为视角[J].法律适用，2019（10）：3-10. [5]陈兵.大数据的竞争法属性及规制意义[J].法学，2018（8）：
107-123. [6]刘继峰，曾晓梅.论用户数据的竞争法保护路径[J].价格理
论与实践，2018（3）：26-30. [7]李阁霞.互联网不正当竞争行为分析——兼评《反不正当竞争法》中“互联网不正当竞争行为”条款[J].知识产权， 2018（2）：20-30. [8]张占江.论反不正当竞争法的谦抑性[J].法学，2019（3）：
45-59. [9]侯媛.反不正当竞争法视野下用户数据获取行为解读[J].
经济法学评论，2018，18（1）：127-143. [10]哈特穆特·毛雷尔.行政法学总论[M].高家伟，译.北京：
法律出版社，2000：238.
[11]SUNSTEIN C R.After the rights revolution：reconceiving
the regulatory state[M].Cambridge，MA：Harvard Universi⁃
ty Press，1990：181. [12]林来梵，张卓明.论权利冲突中的权利位阶——规范法学视角下的透析[J].浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）， 2003（6）：5-13. [13]劳伦斯·索伦.法理词汇：法学院学生的工具箱[M].王凌
皞，译.北京：中国政法大学出版社，2010：144. [14]薛其宇.互联网企业间数据不正当竞争的规制路径[J].汕头大学学报（人文社会科学版），2018，34（12）：62-68， 96.
[15]SIVINSKI G，OKULIAR A，KJOLBYE L.Is big data a big deal？ a competition law approach to big data[J].European competition journal，2017，13（2-3）：199-227. [16]时显群.司法实践中法律规则冲突时该如何处理[J].南京
社会科学，2016（3）：93-99.
[17]蒋舸《.
反不正当竞争法》网络条款的反思与解释——以类型化原理为中心[J].中外法学，2019，31（1）：180-202.
责任编辑：陈诗静
（School of Economics and Law，East China University of Political Science and Law，Shanghai 200000，China）
Abstract：Under the background of digital economy，disputes caused by data capture behavior between enterprises are common. In the context of unclear right attribute of network user data，the regulation path of expanding interpretation of general private law norms is mostly adopted in practice. With the deepening understanding of the illegality of data capture，judicial organs gradually turn to apply the general provisions of anti-unfair competition law to judge disputes over data capture behavior. There are some problems in the judgment of data capture cases of unfair competition，such as excessive reliance on general provision， vague judgment standards of "good faith" and "business ethics"，and limited space for the application of Internet provision. In order to realize the regulation of anti- unfair competition law against data capture，first，we should，establish the principle of modesty of general clauses and follow the idea of market superiority to prevent the hindering of market innovation；second，the judicial organ should change the judgment thinking of "triple authorization" as the standard to judge whether data capture behavior violates business ethics，and respect enterprises’legitimate right in data capture and process；third，we should detail the judgement standard of general provisions，and construct the multi-level judgment standards of network user authorization，cost input，social public welfare and so on according to the proportion of them；and fourth，coordinate the application relationship between general terms and Internet terms，and regulate data capture behavior by means of case balancing or constructing new Internet special provision，which are the basic paths to solve the regulatory dilemma of data capture behavior against unfair competition law.
Key words：data