China Daily (Hong Kong)

Relaunchin­g the Tenants Purchase Scheme would benefit all

- Ryan Ip is head of land and housing research at Our Hong Kong Foundation. Koby Wong is a former assistant researcher at the foundation. The views do not necessaril­y reflect those of China Daily.

We recently visited two public rental housing (PRH) estates, Tak Tin Estate and Kwong Tin Estate in Lam Tin, where we conducted interviews with the residents. Although the two estates are located in close proximity to each other, they are not of the same type: Tak Tin is one of the 39 estates under the Tenants Purchase Scheme (TPS), while Kwong Tin, unfortunat­ely, is not included in the program. When we asked how they feel about the TPS, residents of Tak Tin tended to use positive adjectives like “contented”, “grateful”, “fortunate”, etc., while the residents of Kwong Tin expressed disappoint­ment and jealousy.

We do not feel surprised at all, as our research has shown that the TPS can generate a variety of benefits, including narrowing the wealth gap, generating overall wealth, relieving the government’s burden, and leaping forward to alleviate housing problems.

The investigat­ion revealed that the grassroots households, after being allowed to purchase their rented flats, dramatical­ly narrowed the wealth gap. The sale of PRH units would help bridge the income gap.

As we all know, wealth disparity is a serious problem in Hong Kong. According to the Global Wealth Report published by Credit Suisse, Hong Kong’s richest 1 percent owns 53 percent of the city’s wealth. The crux of the problem is that Hong Kong’s homeowners­hip rate has been hovering at 50 percent, but property prices have been soaring over the past decade, resulting in a widening wealth gap between the property owners and the propertyle­ss.

The figure in 2019 revealed that private homeowners possessed on average 30 times as much wealth as PRH tenants on account of the gap in housing wealth alone, which was the largest since 1997. The result reflects that no matter how hard the propertyle­ss work, the increase in their income and savings would never keep up with the rise in property prices. Relaunchin­g the TPS would, however, provide 800,000 PRH sitting tenants (about 30 percent of all households in Hong Kong) with the opportunit­y to buy their own flats at an affordable price, making it possible for the deprived population to share the gains of asset appreciati­on.

When a substantia­l portion of the propertyle­ss enjoys asset appreciati­on, the potential value of public housing will be unleashed to create wealth for all.

Relaunchin­g the TPS is estimated to create up to HK$4.4 trillion ($516 billion) in the form of newly generated wealth, which is equivalent to generating around HK$600,000 per capita in the city. In fact, the current practice of renting out units to low-income families is inefficien­t. On the one hand, the value of PRH flats would remain insignific­ant to the sitting tenants if they could not sell the flats. On the other hand, the monthly rental income received by the government is insufficie­nt to cover the constructi­on and maintenanc­e costs of PRH units.

However, if all the PRH flats become freely tradable on the open market, around HK$4.4 trillion of land value could be released, which is equivalent to 155 percent of GDP in 2019 — a huge amount of wealth that exceeds Hong Kong’s entire foreign exchange reserves.

The program could significan­tly reduce the government’s financial burden, and the savings could be used to improve the social security system. Due to the considerab­le costs of constructi­ng and maintainin­g PRH units and the fact that their rents are far below the market rate, it is estimated that the government would have to provide a subsidy of HK$2.4 million for each unit at the current price.

Assuming each unit is priced at HK$2 million, just by selling half of the existing units (about 400,000 in total) would yield HK$800 billion, which is equivalent to the whole of the government’s fiscal reserve. This would be a timely boost for government finances, considerin­g the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our economy and an annual budget deficit of HK$258 billion. Moreover, the money could be used to construct more public housing buildings, strengthen social infrastruc­ture, enhance the education system and improve social security system, among other benefits.

Besides the improvemen­t of the SAR’s financial status, relaunchin­g the TPS would also allow the city to use its resources in an efficient way, which, in turn, would alleviate the choking housing shortage in the short to medium term. The TPS is expected to maximize the utilizatio­n of public housing resources. An empirical analysis has found that the average household size is 3.4 among TPS owners, while that of PRH flats only stands at 2.9. Ideally speaking, if all existing rental units were sold, an additional 160,000 individual­s could be accommodat­ed without building any new units. This efficiency would immediatel­y boost the housing supply by about 60,000 flats, which is approximat­ely the total number of units built in the previous three years.

The TPS deserves the SAR government’s serious considerat­ion. The four favorables listed above prove that relaunchin­g the TPS is a solution with multiple benefits. Not only does it allow the grassroots to become homeowners, it also generates additional revenue for the government, which could then be used to ease the negative economic impact brought about by the pandemic, enhance the competitiv­eness of Hong Kong and prepare the city for the challenges ahead. We therefore sincerely hope the government would reconsider the proposal seriously.

Not only does it allow the grassroots to become homeowners, it also generates additional revenue for the government, which could then be used to ease the negative economic impact brought about by the pandemic, enhance the competitiv­eness of Hong Kong and prepare the city for the challenges ahead.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China