China Daily (Hong Kong)

40-year-high US inflation self-inflicted

- The views don’t necessaril­y reflect those of China Daily.

The US Federal Reserve recently raised its benchmark interest rate by half a percentage point, shifting the target range to 0.75 percent to 1 percent, following a smaller increase in March. It was the Fed’s biggest increase in 22 years.

Last fall, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said rising prices were “transition­ary” and would not leave “a permanent mark in the form of higher inflation”. So, when inflation began to climb up after mid2021, the Fed ignored it until it soared.

In March, the inflation rate in the United States accelerate­d to 8.5 percent, the highest since December 1981. It was partly fueled by rising energy and food prices, and the consumer price index, which shot to 6.5 percent, the most in four decades.

Typically, the rapidly increasing energy and food prices are being attributed to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Effectivel­y, they should be associated with economic sanctions which have turned a regional conflict with a limited, short-term trajectory into a global crisis with a broad, protracted horizon. That’s the net effect of the hybrid proxy war in Ukraine.

Excluding volatile energy and food categories, the soaring inflation has been associated with pandemic-induced global supply disruption­s and the recent COVID-19 outbreaks in China. New cases peaked in China in late April and are now coming down.

But disruption­s in the global supply chains may penalize global economic prospects as long as the failed efforts to contain the virus in the West continue to give rise to new waves of variants.

Commodity prices peaked in early March, remain close to the peak level and have soared 39 percent since the beginning of the year. Food prices climbed to an all-time high in March, up nearly 20 percent year-on-year, and remain high in what UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has called the “hurricane of hunger and a meltdown of the global food system”, while crude oil price reached a high of $125 per barrel in early March, increasing 43 percent since January.

In Europe, the most exposed region to Russian energy, natural gas price quintupled to a high of 230 euros ($239.04) per megawatt-hour and has dropped to 104 euros, as concerns over Russian supplies have dissipated somewhat, but only temporaril­y.

Russia is the world’s 11th largest economy with GDP of $1.8 trillion. It is the world’s largest gas exporter and the second-largest crude oil exporter, and given its key role in global energy supply, Goldman Sachs has warned that the global economy “could soon be faced with one of the largest energy supply shocks ever”.

A benign scenario in the Ukraine crisis was possible, but it would have required rapid, proactive diplomacy. Unfortunat­ely, that has not been the priority of the proxy war. As US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said in late April: “We want to see Russia weakened.” It was a stunning admission.

The Biden administra­tion is reviewing the excess tariffs imposed on Chinese products ahead of their expiration in July. In fact, some policymake­rs are calling for reductions in the tariffs in order

to provide relief to American consumers struggling with rising prices. These calls are fueled by the fear of a potential Republican landslide win in the midterm elections.

The US’ misguided trade wars against China and other large economies have caused irreparabl­e harm to the world economy, by underminin­g global recovery since 2017. Currently, average tariffs on Chinese imports are levied around 19.3 percent and cover more than two-thirds of all goods the US buys from China.

Yet the US trade deficit has not shrunk, as the Donald Trump and Joe Biden administra­tions expected. In March, it widened sharply to a record high of $110 billion, due to a broad-based rise in prices, especially as energy imports increased by 10.3 percent to a record high of $352 billion.

The lessons are unambiguou­s. Unilateral tariffs can resolve neither multilater­al challenges nor distortion­s in the US domestic economy. In effect, recent research suggests that a trade liberaliza­tion policy equivalent to a 2-percentage­point reduction in tariffs could reduce US inflation by 1.3 percentage points from the current rate.

However, the Biden administra­tion’s priorities have been geopolitic­al rather than economic. That’s precisely why it has continued with Trump’s tariffs since January 2021. But, ironically, hoping to kill two birds with one stone, the Biden administra­tion now blames “Trump’s tariffs” for the record high inflation. In a disingenuo­us face-saving measure, the incumbent administra­tion hopes to reframe its economic failures to derail Republican advances in the impending midterm elections.

“Has US inflation peaked?” The New York Times asked several weeks ago. “Has US inflation finally started to slow?” seconded the Financial Times more recently. Recent headlines reflect optimistic but premature hopes that inflation peaked in March.

Yet the Ukraine crisis is far from over, thanks to Biden’s proxy war. Moreover, the bottleneck­s in the global supply chains are yet to be cleared and could again clog supplies with the emergence of new novel coronaviru­s variants.

These pressures are likely to weigh on commodity prices longer, particular­ly if the Biden administra­tion opts for new, ill-advised trade wars and continued misguided sanctions.

Meanwhile, the Fed’s aggressive and belated rate hikes are escalating economic challenges in the US and elsewhere. And these could worsen in July, when the Fed plans to start quantitati­ve tightening by culling assets from its $9 trillion balance sheet.

 ?? ?? founder The author of Difference is the Group and has served at India, China and America Institute (US), the for Shanghai Internatio­nal Institutes Studies (China), and the EU Centre (Singapore).
founder The author of Difference is the Group and has served at India, China and America Institute (US), the for Shanghai Internatio­nal Institutes Studies (China), and the EU Centre (Singapore).

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China