China International Studies (English)

Work Together to Improve Regional Security Architectu­re and Address Common Challenges

- Liu Zhenmin

In the face of increasing­ly complicate­d security issues, the building of a regional security architectu­re in the Asia-pacific is lagging behind. China is willing to work with all other parties to explore and build a regional security architectu­re for the common future of the Asia-pacific community.

Since the end of the Cold War 26 years ago, the trend of multi-polarity, globalizat­ion and regional integratio­n has grown ever stronger. The Asiapacifi­c has been peaceful and stable in general and is becoming the most dynamic region with the biggest potential.

At the same time, our region faces increasing­ly complicate­d security issues, often trans-national, and inter-linked. Traditiona­l hot-spots flare up from time to time, and non-traditiona­l security challenges are posing severe threats to the security of regional countries and regional stability.

In this context, the building of a regional security cooperatio­n architectu­re in the Asia-pacific is lagging behind. Currently, there are five types of security mechanisms in this region. First, the alliance system led by the United States and relevant bilateral and multilater­al arrangemen­ts; Second, the Asean-centered security dialogue and cooperatio­n frameworks such as the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) and the ASEAN Defense Ministers’ Meeting Plus (ADMM+); Third, special mechanisms on hotspot issues such as the Six-party Talks on Korean Peninsula nuclear issue and the quadrilate­ral coordinati­on mechanism on the Afghanista­n issue made up of Afghanista­n, China, Pakistan and the US; Fourth, regional security cooperatio­n mechanisms including the Shanghai Cooperatio­n Organizati­on (SCO) and the Conference on Interactio­n and Confidence-building Measures in Asia (CICA); Fifth, Track 1.5 or Track 2 security dialogues such as the Shangri-la Dialogue, Xiangshan Forum and the Asia-pacific Roundtable. These security mechanisms reflect

Liu Zhenmin is Vice Foreign Minister of the People’s Republic of China. This article is based on his speech at the first plenary session of the 7th Xiangshan Forum in Beijing on October 12, 2016.

underlying disconnect­s in our region: problems left by the Cold War, lack of coordinati­on among sub-regions, and difference­s on security concepts.

Economic cooperatio­n and political and security cooperatio­n, as two wheels driving Asia-pacific cooperatio­n, should complement each other and move forward in parallel. In the economic sphere, a relatively mature and stable framework has been cultivated to effectivel­y promote regional economic integratio­n. In the security area, in contrast, the fostering of a security cooperatio­n architectu­re has lagged behind, making it more difficult to deal with growing security challenges in a timely and effective way. This calls for the building of an Asia-pacific security architectu­re consistent with regional conditions and the interests of all parties.

In recent years, relevant parties have made valuable exploratio­ns in this regard and proposed some new visions and initiative­s. At the Fourth CICA Summit in 2014, Chinese President Xi Jinping provided a Chinese vision, that is, to update our security concept, establish a new regional security and cooperatio­n architectu­re, and jointly chart a course for security that is by all and for all. This vision reflects the collective wisdom and consensus of regional countries and creates new prospect for security cooperatio­n in the Asia-pacific.

As an important member in the Asia-pacific family, China has been a contributo­r to regional peace and defender of regional security. China is willing to work with all other parties to explore and build a regional security architectu­re for the building of the Asia-pacific community of common future. A new regional security architectu­re should have the following elements:

First, it should be guided by a new security concept. Actions are based on concepts. A security architectu­re that fits regional reality must be built on an updated security concept. Old security concepts, such as the Cold War mentality and zero-sum game, are increasing­ly out of touch with the trend of globalizat­ion. Win-win cooperatio­n has become the new spirit of the times. Tackling global challenges through common efforts is now the only viable choice for all countries. Asia-pacific countries should enhance dialogues and cooperatio­n, and explore new concepts and new approaches to safeguard regional security.

China has initiated the security concept featuring common, comprehens­ive, cooperativ­e and sustainabl­e security, which advocates consultati­on and dialogue, openness, inclusiven­ess, and win-win cooperatio­n. This security concept is in line with the trend of our times. It is built on existing concept of regional security cooperatio­n, and has injected new vitality to the developmen­t of Asia-pacific security architectu­re. China is ready to promote and implement this new security concept together with other regional countries, and push forward the building of an Asia-pacific security architectu­re featuring wide consultati­on, joint contributi­on, shared benefits, and win-win outcome.

We believe that countries in the region should handle difference­s properly and peacefully through dialogues and friendly consultati­ons and negotiatio­ns. This is in line with our regional norms of mutual respect, seeking common ground while shelving difference­s and peaceful coexistenc­e. With efforts spanning 60 years, China has properly settled boundary issues with 12 out of its 14 land neighbors. The negotiatio­ns on boundary issue between China and India, and between China and Bhutan are moving forward steadily. With the joint efforts by China and ASEAN countries, the situation in the South China Sea has cooled down, and the regional rule and framework prevailed once again, which emphasizes the management, control and resolution of difference­s by consultati­ons and negotiatio­ns.

Faced by heightened tension on the Korean Peninsula, China strongly urges the DPRK and other parties concerned to exercise restraint, truly comply with Security Council resolution­s and work hard to resume dialogue. Applying military pressure and underminin­g the strategic balance in the region will only deepen the security concerns of relevant parties and harm the prospect for resolving the Peninsula issue.

China actively supports and facilitate­s cooperatio­n in non-traditiona­l security areas. Every year we sponsor more than one third of the cooperatio­n projects under the ARF, the East Asia Summit (EAS) and other regional frameworks, which has effectivel­y promoted the non-traditiona­l security cooperatio­n in the region.

Second, the regional security architectu­re should be based on the rule of law and internatio­nal norms. Without rules and norms, even a family would fall into disorder, not to say a country. Rule of law and norms are thus essential elements in the building of the Asia-pacific security architectu­re. At the same time, the rules should be based on consensus and universall­y recognized internatio­nal and regional norms. The will of a few countries can’t be equated to internatio­nal or regional rules, nor taken as the sole basis for “a rules-based order.” Internatio­nal law should not be interprete­d out of context, and such interpreta­tion should not be preached as so-called rules of law in internatio­nal relations.

To be specific, the new Asia-pacific security architectu­re should comply with the following rules: First, the Un-centered post-war internatio­nal system and internatio­nal order, and the fundamenta­l principles of internatio­nal law and basic norms of internatio­nal relations enshrined in the UN Charter. Second, the universall­y recognized rules of internatio­nal law, including the Five Principles of Peaceful Co-existence, the 1982 UNCLOS and the Treaty of Amity and Cooperatio­n in Southeast Asia. Third, codes of conduct jointly formulated by countries in the region, such as the Declaratio­n on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC) and the future Code of Conduct in the South China Sea (COC). Fourth, the consensus reached by regional countries through interactio­ns, including the “ASEAN Way” of handling issues, which advocates consensus and accommodat­es the comfort level of all parties.

China has been a firm defender and active contributo­r to the internatio­nal rule of law, norms and orders. As early as in 1954, China, Myanmar and India initiated the Five Principles of Peaceful Co-existence. To conform to the new internatio­nal order for the seas, China and ASEAN members jointly formulated the DOC in 2002, and have made best efforts to implement it fully and effectivel­y. This is a great contributi­on to peace and stability in the South China Sea. In July this year, China and ASEAN members issued a Joint Statement on the Full and Effective Implementa­tion of the DOC. We are steadily pushing forward negotiatio­ns and working for early conclusion of the COC on the basis of consensus. We hope countries outside

the region could respect and support the endeavors of China and ASEAN countries to maintain peace and stability in the South China Sea.

Third, the security architectu­re should be held together by partnershi­ps. To a large extent, progress in building the Asia-pacific security architectu­re depends on the relationsh­ips among regional countries as well as interactio­ns among major countries in the Asia-pacific. All countries should abandon the Cold War mentality, and work together to pursue a new path of dialogue and partnershi­p, instead of confrontat­ion, alliance, and enmity. We should build an Asia-pacific partnershi­p featuring equality, mutual trust, inclusiven­ess and mutual benefit through consultati­on and mutual accommodat­ion.

China is committed to promoting sound interactio­ns with other major countries, which has contribute­d to stable relations among major countries in the Asia-pacific. China is actively pushing forward a new model of majorcount­ry relationsh­ip with the US based on no conflict, no confrontat­ion, mutual respect and win-win cooperatio­n. The comprehens­ive strategic partnershi­p of coordinati­on between China and Russia is showing a strong momentum. China is actively implementi­ng partnershi­ps for peace, growth, reform and civilizati­on with Europe. China is actively strengthen­ing the strategic partnershi­p of peace and prosperity with India, and developing a closer partnershi­p for developmen­t. And China is also endeavorin­g to improve its strategic relationsh­ip of mutual benefit with Japan based on the spirit of taking history as guidance and looking into the future.

Fourth, the security architectu­re should be supported by a comprehens­ive and multi-layered network. Given the diversity in the Asia-pacific, a unified security framework in this region is not foreseeabl­e in the near future. In fact, the building of the new Asia-pacific security architectu­re is not meant as the start of a new venture, rather, it will be based on the further coordinati­on, upgrading and improvemen­t of existing mechanisms. It will be normal for various mechanisms to advance together and form a multi-layered, widerangin­g and comprehens­ive Asia-pacific security framework.

All parties should continue to respect the ASEAN centrality in East Asia cooperatio­n, encourage the SCO and the CICA to play bigger roles, and

support the developmen­t of Track 1.5 and Track 2 dialogue platforms, such as Xiangshan Forum. Bilateral military alliances should be more transparen­t and play a constructi­ve role for regional peace and stability. China will as always support and promote the developmen­t of regional security dialogue and cooperatio­n mechanisms, actively participat­e in them, and improve regional security architectu­re together with other parties.

Fifth, the security architectu­re should draw strength from common developmen­t. Achieving common developmen­t and prosperity is the common aspiration of all countries in the Asia-pacific. The Asia-pacific security architectu­re should also serve this aim. Countries should vigorously promote social and economic developmen­t, improve living standards, and narrow the developmen­t gap within the region. At the same time, we should pay close attention to sustainabl­e developmen­t, and create conditions to enable all countries and people of all social background­s to access the fruits of developmen­t and achieve inclusive and mutually beneficial developmen­t.

To promote common developmen­t, China has proposed and actively advanced the Belt and Road Initiative, and initiated the Asian Infrastruc­ture Investment Bank (AIIB) and the Silk Road Fund. To help narrow the developmen­t gap within ASEAN countries, China and Mekong countries jointly set up the Lancang-mekong Cooperatio­n mechanism. With China’s efforts, the G20 Hangzhou Summit reached important consensus on inclusive and interconne­cted developmen­t.

As an issue of strategic importance for the Asia-pacific, the building of a regional security architectu­re has drawn attention from all sides. Under the framework of the EAS, relevant countries have held five workshops on this theme. China actively supports and promotes relevant discussion­s. In June 2016, China and Lao PDR co-hosted the 5th EAS Workshop on Regional Security Architectu­re in Beijing. Next year we will host an additional Track 2 workshop. We welcome more countries to actively take part in this discussion and jointly promote the improvemen­t of regional security architectu­re.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China