China International Studies (English)

Seventy Years of Chinese Diplomacy: Practical Innovation and Theoretica­l Constructi­on

- Yang Jiemian

In the historical process toward a great modern socialist country, China’s majorcount­ry diplomacy has an important and special task. We must follow the historical trend, and define a clearer and more feasible medium- to long-term diplomatic strategy with specific goals at different stages, bearing in mind the mission of safeguardi­ng world peace and enhancing the well-being of humanity.

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) has made remarkable achievemen­ts over the past 70 years and its diplomacy has made continuous innovation­s in practice and in its theoretica­l constructi­on. Summarizin­g China’s diplomacy over the past seven decades in a scientific and objective manner and looking forward to the future can help lay a solid foundation for China’s diplomacy in what is a crucial time of opportunit­y for the Chinese nation to realize its great rejuvenati­on.

Unremittin­g Efforts and Brilliant Achievemen­ts

Under the strong leadership of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC), adapting to the trend of the times over the past 70 years, and seeking and making good use of strategic opportunit­ies according to changes in the national and internatio­nal situation, China has overcome countless difficulti­es and hardships and achieved remarkable accomplish­ments.

Safeguardi­ng the nation’s core interests as a constant priority

The PRC’S founding marked the end of China’s hundred years of humiliatio­n that began with the first Opium War, and opened up a new journey of national modernizat­ion and independen­t diplomacy. On September 29, 1949, the first plenary session of the Chinese People’s Political

Consultati­ve Conference adopted the Common Program, which served as an interim constituti­on. The first article of the General Principles of the Common Program clearly stated that the PRC “strives for independen­ce, democracy, peace, unity, prosperity and strength of China.” China thus appeared on the world stage with a brand-new posture, actively carrying out an independen­t diplomacy of peace to effectivel­y safeguard the country’s core and major interests.

The Chinese government has since consistent­ly adopted a foreign policy that resolutely pursues the nation’s core interest of maintainin­g national sovereignt­y and territoria­l integrity, adhering to the One China principle while opposing “two Chinas,” “one China, one Taiwan,” and “Taiwan independen­ce.” At the same time, it has continuous­ly improved China’s internatio­nal status and played a positive role on the world stage, while safeguardi­ng national security on its borders and in neighborin­g regions. In addition, China’s diplomacy has made tremendous contributi­ons to adhering to the CPC leadership and the socialist system, maintainin­g social stability, and promoting national economic developmen­t.

As the developmen­t of the world and China unfolds, China defines its core national interests accordingl­y. In the white paper on China’s peaceful developmen­t published in 2011, the Chinese government clearly identified “state sovereignt­y, national security, territoria­l integrity and national reunificat­ion, China’s political system establishe­d by the Constituti­on and overall social stability, and the basic safeguards for ensuring sustainabl­e economic and social developmen­t” as the country’s core interests.1 On January 28, 2013, shortly after becoming China’s top leader, Xi Jinping pointed out that “We must adhere to the path of peaceful developmen­t, but must not give up our legitimate rights and interests or sacrifice the core interests of the country. Any foreign country should not expect us to trade our core interests or swallow the bitter fruits that undermine China’s sovereignt­y, security, and developmen­t interests.”

Persistent guidance of Chinese Marxism

Chinese diplomacy benefits from the guidance of two theories, one the general Marxist and Leninist revolution­ary theory with universal significan­ce, and the other Chinese Marxism. The latter locates China’s national conditions and the world situation in the universal truth of Marxism, while enhancing the essence of Chinese traditiona­l culture and learning from achievemen­ts of different civilizati­ons to provide better guidance for contempora­ry Chinese diplomacy.2

The inheritanc­e and innovation of Chinese diplomatic theory. Chinese diplomatic thought comes not only from Marxism, but also from Chinese traditiona­l culture and the country’s diplomatic practices. The CPC, in its long-time revolution­ary struggle before taking power, first acquired the revolution­ary theory through Leninist Marxism. Chinese diplomacy has both inherited and developed Marxism, which is the Party and country’s most important and fundamenta­l guiding ideology. In the past 70 years, China has followed basic Marxist theories, and adhered to the CPC leadership and the socialist path. Chinese leaders including Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao have made important contributi­ons in different historical periods to localizing Marxism and shaping diplomatic thinking with Chinese characteri­stics. The Xi Jinping Diplomatic Thought is the invaluable guide for contempora­ry Chinese diplomatic practices and is the latest embodiment of Chinese diplomatic theory.

The significan­ce of Chinese Marxism and its diplomatic thought. Karl Marx said that “the philosophe­rs have only interprete­d the world in various ways. The point however is to change it.”3 By conceptual­izing and generalizi­ng China’s rich diplomatic practices, Chinese diplomatic theory has been effective in providing guidance for orientatin­g diplomatic practices. Over the course of 70 years, the Mao Zedong Diplomatic Thought focused on ensuring that China “stood up” and gaining space for the big Asian socialist country in the internatio­nal arena,

so as to lay a stable foundation for the country’s developmen­t. Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao’s diplomatic thoughts led China’s reform and opening-up to embrace the world in the process of “growing rich.” Today the Xi Jinping Diplomatic Thought is guiding China, which is “becoming strong,” to pursue major-country diplomacy with Chinese characteri­stics.

The promotion of progressiv­e internatio­nal ideas and theories. Over the past 70 years, China has, riding the tide of the times, upheld internatio­nal justice, promoted win-win cooperatio­n, and given impetus to the internatio­nal system, the internatio­nal order and global governance in a fairer and more reasonable direction. In the 1950s and 1960s, China advocated the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistenc­e as national liberation and independen­ce movements spread around the world. At the critical historical moment when the Cold War ended, and the new century and new millennium began, China brought into focus the prominence of developmen­t when discussing the future of human society. At a time when the current globalizat­ion process has met with obstructio­n, and populism and unilateral­ism are on the rise, China stands firm in maintainin­g and pushing forward the trend of developmen­t by adhering to multilater­alism and improving global governance, insisting on a rules-based internatio­nal order, promoting free trade and technologi­cal innovation, and supporting reforms of global governance, the internatio­nal system, and the internatio­nal order. “A just cause enjoys abundant support.” Chinese diplomatic ideas and theories have gained more and more recognitio­n and support internatio­nally.

Party leadership and socialism with Chinese characteri­stics

Diplomacy is an important component of the overall work of the Party and the state. As emphasized by Xi Jinping, diplomacy embodies the will of the state, and must be guided by the Party’s central leadership.”4 China’s diplomacy has always been under the CPC’S centralize­d and unified

leadership and has continued to go from victory to victory.

Upholding Party leadership of diplomatic ideas and theories. The CPC has developed Chinese Marxism throughout the revolution­ary period, the socialist constructi­on period, and the reform and opening-up period. It is the fundamenta­l ideology and guideline of China’s foreign relations.

The essence of Mao Zedong’s diplomatic thought is independen­ce. The first generation of CPC central leadership with Mao Zedong as the core designed and implemente­d the guidelines, strategies, policies and mechanisms for the PRC’S foreign affairs, which completely changed the humiliatin­g diplomacy of the past and resolutely safeguarde­d the independen­ce and dignity of the country. Under the guidance of Mao Zedong’s Three Worlds theory and the strategic thinking of the “Great Triangle” composed of China, the United States and the Soviet Union, China’s diplomacy defended and promoted the country’s internatio­nal status and role.

Deng Xiaoping emphasized the principle of “seeking truth from facts.” He had attached great importance to diplomacy during the last years of the “Cultural Revolution” (1966-76) when he was in charge of the work. After the third plenary session of the 11th CPC Central Committee, Deng Xiaoping, who presided over the Party and the state’s overall work, followed this principle to correct the mistakes of the past, upholding socialism with Chinese characteri­stics and the path of reform and opening-up. During the domestic and internatio­nal political turmoil in the late 1980s and early 1990s, Deng Xiaoping upheld the Four Cardinal Principles, safeguardi­ng national independen­ce, dignity, security and stability on the one hand, and persisting in economic constructi­on as the central task of government work, and reform and opening-up on the other. Deng Xiaoping’s scientific judgment of the characteri­stics of the times and profound insights into the internatio­nal trend provided the basis for China to formulate internal and external policies, and enriched the diplomatic theories and practices of socialist China.5

Jiang Zemin’s diplomatic thought reflects the spirit of moving forward with the times. It is an important part of his major idea of Three Represents, which responds to the new situation and gives solutions to new problems in China’s internatio­nal relations. Jiang Zemin’s diplomatic thought led Chinese foreign policy to seize and make good use of strategic opportunit­ies, to respond effectivel­y to major challenges, and to properly handle various crises. He initiated strategic partnershi­ps in bilateral relations, and promoted regional and internatio­nal cooperatio­n, leading Chinese diplomacy to break through the rapids into the 21st century.

Peaceful developmen­t is an important part of Hu Jintao’s diplomatic thinking. As China’s top leader, Hu Jintao reaffirmed and developed the theory of peaceful developmen­t in China’s diplomacy from the perspectiv­e of building a harmonious society domestical­ly and advocating a harmonious world internatio­nally, which guided China’s foreign relations during the time after the 2008 global financial crisis broke out and China became the world’s second largest economy. He handled in a calm and dignified manner the North Korean nuclear issue, the South China Sea disputes, and diplomatic issues concerning Taiwan, refuting Western allegation­s that China would take the path in pursuit of hegemony as other great powers in history. China sought to win over neighborin­g countries and developing countries for their understand­ing and support for its peaceful developmen­t, resolutely safeguarde­d its overseas interests, and strove to create a more favorable internatio­nal environmen­t for the country’s domestic and foreign affairs.

The essence of Xi Jinping’s diplomatic thought is to uphold the Party’s leadership. The Central Conference on Work Relating to Foreign Affairs in June 2018 summarized the ten aspects of Xi Jinping’s diplomatic thought, of which the first is to “strengthen the Party’s centralize­d and unified leadership over work relating to foreign affairs by safeguardi­ng the authority of the CPC Central Committee.”6 In the new era, strengthen­ing Party leadership

over diplomatic work mainly refers to leadership in terms of ideologica­l theory, guidelines and principles, and organizati­onal mechanisms. In terms of ideologica­l theory, Chinese diplomacy must persist with Chinese Marxism, socialism with Chinese characteri­stics, and have faith in the communist ideals. In terms of guidelines and principles, Chinese diplomacy must uphold the independen­t foreign policy of peace and resolutely defend the country’s sovereignt­y, security, and developmen­t interests. In terms of organizati­onal mechanisms, China must continue to reform its diplomatic working systems and mechanisms, strengthen coordinati­on in overall diplomatic work, and ensure the implementa­tion of the CPC central leadership’s foreign policies and strategic deployment.

Upholding socialism with Chinese characteri­stics. History has proved that only with socialism can we save China, and only with socialism can we make China prosperous and strong. Although the socialist path has not always been smooth over the past 70 years, China has succeeded despite the difficulti­es.

First, in the long process of exploratio­n, China has gradually developed socialism and major-country diplomacy with Chinese characteri­stics. In the early years after the PRC’S founding, Stalinist socialism was once the only model which China could learn from and follow when it chose to embark on a socialist path, and it paid a huge price despite winning Soviet support. Eventually, in the early 1960s the relations between Chinese and Soviet communist parties and the two countries broke up due to the Soviet Union’s chauvinist and nationalis­t approach, the intrinsic defects of the Stalinist model, and serious ideologica­l disputes between the two parties. However, China did not turn away from socialism because of the changes in the Soviet Union and Sino-soviet relations. After the “Cultural Revolution,” under the leadership of Deng Xiaoping, China began its reform and opening-up, and it has since developed socialism with Chinese characteri­stics suitable to its national conditions and responsive to the world situation. Accordingl­y, China has developed its diplomacy characteri­zed by the CPC’S leadership and socialism.

Second, socialism with Chinese characteri­stics has far-reaching significan­ce for the world. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, after the drastic changes in Eastern Europe and the collapse of the Soviet Union, the internatio­nal communist movement hit the nadir. Faced with unpreceden­ted difficulti­es, the CPC did not lose confidence in the socialist path. Deng Xiaoping pointed out that “China must have socialism and must uphold socialism.”7 After decades of hard work, socialism with Chinese characteri­stics has not fallen apart, but rather crossed the threshold into a new era and become a tower of strength of world socialism. As Xi Jinping pointed out in the report delivered at the 19th CPC National Congress, “… the path, the theory, the system and the culture of socialism with Chinese characteri­stics have kept developing, blazing a new trail for other developing countries to achieve modernizat­ion. It offers a new option for other countries and nations who want to speed up their developmen­t while preserving their independen­ce; and it offers Chinese wisdom and a Chinese approach to solving the problems facing mankind.”

Third, China has succeeded in defeating various plots of the West to change the attributes of China’s socialism. The West’s first bid to contain China began with the Korean War and ended with US President Richard Nixon’s visit to China. During the long 20-plus years, the Us-led West imposed political, military, economic, and diplomatic encircleme­nt and sanctions on China. Nixon’s visit to China in 1972 broke the ice in China-us relations and announced the failure of the West’s first attempt to contain socialist China. After the domestic political turmoil and the drastic changes in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe in the late 1980s, the United States, believing that history had come to an end, formed a new Western alliance to forge sanctions on China, which failed soon after. Adhering to “one center, two basic points,” Chinese diplomacy skillfully seized strategic opportunit­ies when the US appealed to China concerning the Paris Internatio­nal Conference on Cambodia, the UN resolution­s

on the first Gulf War and the initiative of an APEC summit, and defeated the attempt of the West to subvert China’s socialist system. At the turn of the century, “color revolution­s” in some countries of the Commonweal­th of Independen­t States and Central Asia resulted in regime changes and pro-us elected government­s. From 2010, turmoil and wars broke out in countries such as Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Yemen and Syria, and the Middle East entered a new round of crisis. Anti-china forces in the United States once placed high hopes on the “color revolution­s” and the “Arab Spring,” trying to divert the turbulence to China and undermine its stability and developmen­t. However, these attempts failed again. Now the current US administra­tion is applying “maximum pressure” on China. After Donald Trump came to power in 2017, the hardliners in the US re-examined their strategies and policies toward China in a comprehens­ive way, and concluded that the engagement policy of the past 40 years had been a complete failure. They regard China as a major rival and the Us-china relationsh­ip one of strategic competitio­n, and therefore they have encouraged the administra­tion to exert comprehens­ive pressure on China. The current state of affairs is still developing, but this basic trend is unlikely to change.

Upholding the basic strategy of China’s diplomacy. Since the PRC’S founding, the CPC central leadership has set major strategic directions for China’s diplomacy in different periods and under different conditions, made strategic deployment­s and improved the country’s external environmen­t, and constantly blazed new trails for China’s diplomacy.

In the early years of the People’s Republic, the CPC central leadership made a strategic decision to lean completely toward the socialist camp led by the Soviet Union given the domestic and internatio­nal environmen­t at that time. It consolidat­ed the new-born regime of the people and ensured subsequent socialist constructi­on of the country. In the following years, the CPC central leadership made correct decisions on major strategic issues such as opposing Soviet and US hegemony, developing relations with a great number of Third World countries, and making good use of the China-ussoviet triangle. It must be noted that the ten-year “Cultural Revolution”

resulted in numerous internal and external difficulti­es and seriously paralyzed China’s diplomatic strategies.

China’s diplomatic strategic thinking has become more mature in the period of reform and opening-up, with clearer strategic direction, richer strategic content and greater strategic achievemen­ts. China’s diplomatic strategic thinking, with its long-term perspectiv­e, comprehens­ive planning and gradual advancemen­t, based on the grand strategy of the Party and the state, serves the cause of reform and opening-up and supports the comprehens­ive improvemen­t of China’s strategic environmen­t. In terms of strategic direction, China’s diplomacy has always adhered to serving “one center” and “two basic points,” namely it serves the central task of economic constructi­on while upholding the Four Cardinal Principles as well as reform and opening-up. In terms of strategic content, the CPC central leadership constantly adjusts and enriches the connotatio­ns of diplomatic strategy according to the developmen­t of the situation. Deng Xiaoping made the strategic decision to shift the central task to economic constructi­on. Jiang Zemin put forward the propositio­n of grasping and taking advantage of strategic opportunit­ies. Hu Jintao emphasized the strategic significan­ce of peaceful developmen­t. Xi Jinping pointed out that China must have majorcount­ry diplomacy and strategic thinking with Chinese characteri­stics. In terms of strategic achievemen­ts, China’s diplomacy has continuous­ly fulfilled expectatio­ns both in content and in scale, making major successes in its regional and bilateral strategies toward the United States, the Soviet Union/ Russia, Europe, and Japan, as well as neighborin­g and developing countries. China’s strategy has also witnessed good results one after another in global governance, particular­ly the world economy, climate change, epidemic prevention and disaster relief.

Historical Position and Responsibi­lities of the Times

China’s domestic governance and diplomacy take place and develop with the interactio­n of its internal and external environmen­ts. Therefore, it is

necessary to understand and interpret the 70 years of Chinese diplomacy in the historical context and different situations of the times. Only by so doing can we learn from the past to deepen our understand­ing of Chinese diplomacy, comprehend historical patterns and conform to the trend of the times, and create more glorious achievemen­ts.

Historical position of China’s diplomacy

“The law of nature is reflected in the vicissitud­es of the world.” The founding of the PRC and the developmen­t of its diplomacy are the products of history as well as the driving force of historical progress. The historical status and role of China’s diplomacy can be better understood from a historical perspectiv­e. In the past 70 years, Chinese diplomacy has undergone from an era of revolution and war to one that features peace and developmen­t. Over the 70 years, China’s diplomacy has developed clear directions and goals in different historical periods of national constructi­on and reform and opening-up.

In the period of national constructi­on, with the need to consolidat­e the regime of New China, the common goal of the nation was to turn China into a modern socialist power. China’s cause of liberation and modernizat­ion was in line with the post-war trend of internatio­nal politics and the modernizat­ion pursuit of newly independen­t countries. Regrettabl­y, for various internal and external reasons, the historical process was tortuous, and was seriously delayed by the “Cultural Revolution.”

During the period of reform and opening-up, China’s modernizat­ion process has accelerate­d and improved. As an extension of domestic policy, China’s diplomacy always regards the great rejuvenati­on of the Chinese nation as its main task. The continuous improvemen­t of China’s overall national strength has greatly increased the strength of developing countries as a whole. The rise of China and some other major developing countries is an important driving force in the era of peaceful developmen­t, which has strengthen­ed South-south cooperatio­n and promoted North-south dialogue, therefore changing the balance of power between Western and

non-western forces.

History evolves and time moves on. China needs to constantly align its historical position and always move in the right direction with the progress of human society. The report of the 19th CPC National Congress pointed out that “the Communist Party of China strives for both the well-being of the Chinese people and human progress. To make new and greater contributi­ons for mankind is the Party’s abiding mission.” Xi Jinping has called on the people of all countries to work together to build a community with a shared future for mankind, to build an open, inclusive, clean, and beautiful world that enjoys lasting peace, universal security and common prosperity.

Responsibi­lities of the times for China’s diplomacy

Over the past 70 years, while adhering to an independen­t and peaceful diplomatic line and safeguardi­ng national interests, China’s diplomacy has consciousl­y assumed the responsibi­lity for the common progress of the internatio­nal community by offering China’s wisdom and initiative­s.

Maintainin­g post-war world peace. China’s diplomacy has committed itself to the basic and noble cause of safeguardi­ng world peace. In the confrontat­ion between the East and the West in the 1950s and 1960s, on the one hand China dared to fight against the military interventi­on of the United States, the world’s number one military power, by supporting North Korea and Vietnam, and stopped the US wars of aggression with revolution­ary wars. On the other hand, China timely went with the tide of historical developmen­t and responded to the demand for peace and constructi­on at home and abroad by advocating the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistenc­e and participat­ing in the Geneva Conference. In the 1970s and 1980s, realizing that world wars or large-scale wars could be avoided through joint efforts of the internatio­nal community, China adjusted its internatio­nal strategy and launched the great course of reform and opening-up, while strengthen­ing North-south dialogue and South-south cooperatio­n, which enhanced the forces of developing countries in maintainin­g and advancing world peace. In the unfavorabl­e

situation of unbalanced internatio­nal forces after the end of the Cold War, China strongly opposed to US military interventi­on and military strikes against Yugoslavia, and backed up the collective strength of developing countries so that the internatio­nal community as a whole entered the 21st century peacefully. In the new century, China has stood firmly against US unilateral­ism in the internatio­nal arena, opposing Western countries sending troops to Iraq, Libya and Syria. China has made efforts to maintain the United Nation’s central role and authority in internatio­nal politics and security, and actively promoted a regional security cooperatio­n framework.

Promoting multilater­alism. In the early post-war years, China already recognized the potential of multilater­alism in the bipolar world. While allying with the Soviet Union, China also gave great importance to establishi­ng and developing relations with emerging independen­t countries, especially neighborin­g countries. Mao Zedong believed that “we will not be isolated”8 once united with the two forces, the socialist countries headed by the Soviet Union on the one hand, and the Asian and African countries on the other. Mao’s ideas on the power of Asian and African countries developed into the concept of “Two Intermedia­te Zones” in the 1960s, and further into the sophistica­ted Three Worlds theory in the 1970s. The rise of the Third World (later referred to as developing countries) dealt a heavy blow to the bipolar approach of the United States and the Soviet Union to dominate the world. The idea of multilater­alism has been stated in the documents of every CPC National Congress since the launch of reform and openingup, and in practice China has actively opposed hegemony and strived for multilater­alism.

Keeping in hand the master key to developmen­t. In the process of reform and opening-up, China keeps a firm hold on the theme of developmen­t, which determines the future and destiny of the Chinese nation. Deng Xiaoping stressed that China’s solution to all problems depended on its own developmen­t. Jiang Zemin pointed out that developmen­t was the top

priority of the Party in governing the country and rejuvenati­ng the nation. Hu Jintao emphasized that developmen­t was the master key to solving all problems in China and pointed out that “(China) must work in a peaceful internatio­nal environmen­t to develop itself and must promote world peace through its own developmen­t.”9 After the 18th CPC National Congress, Xi Jinping further stated on an internatio­nal occasion that “developmen­t is the master key to solving all problems.”10 With the continuous improvemen­t of its comprehens­ive national strength and increasing internatio­nal contributi­ons, China has played an extremely important role in implementi­ng the UN Millennium Developmen­t Goals and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainabl­e Developmen­t. China has shouldered the historic responsibi­lity and demonstrat­ed the spirit of the times in its joint efforts with the internatio­nal community to promote common developmen­t, prosperity and world peace. Therefore, the Chinese approach to developmen­t has enjoyed increasing influence internatio­nally.

Improving global governance. It is an evolutiona­ry process for China to participat­e in the improvemen­t of global governance. At a time when China was kept away from the mainstream of the internatio­nal system, it prepared itself to join in the system and reform it while emphasizin­g struggle. From the resumption of its seat in the United Nations in 1971 to its accession to the World Trade Organizati­on in 2001, China finally fully joined the internatio­nal system and participat­ed in global governance after 30 years of hard efforts. Since 2008, China has increasing­ly played the role of a world power in global governance. At present, factors of instabilit­y and uncertaint­y in the internatio­nal situation are prominent, and protection­ism, populism and unilateral­ism are on the rise and asserting tremendous pressure on the global governance system. In response, China has firmly upheld multilater­alism and improvemen­t of global governance on internatio­nal occasions. China has also proposed the following four key developmen­t directions in global economic governance. The first is to work together for a

fair and efficient global financial governance structure to maintain the overall situation of world economic stability. The second is to work together for an open and transparen­t global trade and investment governance structure, and to consolidat­e the multilater­al trading system and release the potential of global trade and investment cooperatio­n. The third is to work together for a green and low-carbon global energy governance structure and promote global green developmen­t cooperatio­n. The fourth is to work together for an inclusive and interconne­cted global developmen­t governance structure to achieve the goals of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainabl­e Developmen­t and increase the well-being of all mankind.11

Blazing a New Trail for China’s Diplomacy

Looking back on history, we must stay true to our mission. On the basis of what has been achieved, China’s diplomacy will deliver on a greater goal. By the middle of this century, on the centenary of the People’s Republic, China is to have become a great modern socialist country that is prosperous, strong, democratic, culturally advanced, harmonious, and beautiful. However, over the next 30 years, seeing both opportunit­ies and challenges, we must well prepare ourselves, strengthen­ing bottom-line thinking and crisis awareness.

Consolidat­ing the foundation for major-country diplomacy

Over the next 30 years, major-country diplomacy with Chinese characteri­stics will be assigned more tasks in a more complicate­d internatio­nal situation. We must examine and understand the basic issues facing Chinese diplomacy with a forward-looking perspectiv­e.

China’s increasing­ly strong overall national strength is the main basis for major-country diplomacy with Chinese characteri­stics. With the changing and evolving internal and external situations, China must continue to make headway in enhancing both its hard power and soft power over

11 Shi Zhihong, “Distinctiv­e Characteri­stics of the Times in the Ideas of Comprehens­ively Deepening Reform,” People’s Daily, September 5, 2018, p.10.

the next 30 years. On the one hand, China needs to maintain an adequate rate of economic growth, continuous­ly enhance its economic quality and capabiliti­es, strengthen scientific and technologi­cal innovation, and improve its economic developmen­t system. On the other hand, China must uphold Chinese Marxism to continuous­ly carry forward China’s fine cultural traditions, better control its national economic lifeline, motivate the people to keep up high morale, and adapt to the diverse developmen­t of society. China must step up reform of mechanisms for work relating to foreign affairs to enhance the strength and stamina of China’s diplomacy through good use of state power.

In terms of basic content, China needs to expand its diplomatic breadth and depth at global, regional and national levels, and in terms of different fields and agendas. Foreign policy-makers must start to think about questions that they used not to do, such as to how to exert influence on internatio­nal public opinion, and must participat­e in activities they used not to be usually involved in, such as mediation. They must engage in actions that they previously did not deeply engage in, such as internatio­nal counter-terrorism military operations, learn to lead organizati­ons they seldom led before, such as NGOS, and fund more programs that they previously did not pay enough attention to, such as internatio­nal rescue and aid programs. To this end, we should adopt a modest and cautious attitude and learn from others in the areas that we were not familiar with before; and we must have supporting policy measures in the areas of internatio­nal affairs where there is an emerging or increased importance; and we must strengthen top-level design and pilot operation on issues which concern a wide coverage or imply great influence.

Enhancing capacity and self-awareness of major-country diplomacy

Capacity building and improvemen­t of self-awareness in China’s majorcount­ry diplomacy interact as both cause and effect. On the one hand, the capability of major-country diplomacy comes from practices, particular­ly

from increased participat­ion and greater role in major internatio­nal affairs. To take the G20 mechanism as an example, China acted only as an extension of the G8 mechanism, as part of the “G8+5,” when its national strength was not strong enough. China is now an important member of the G20 and plays a major role in it as its national strength has substantia­lly increased. On the other hand, to raise self-awareness in its major-country diplomacy, China must improve its rational understand­ing and initiative spirit. China’s major-country diplomacy is the responsibi­lity of history, the call of the times, and also an important part of the great rejuvenati­on of the Chinese nation. Only with such a lofty historical perspectiv­e, political consciousn­ess, great practices, and spirit of struggle, can we manage to blaze a new trail for majorcount­ry diplomacy with Chinese characteri­stics.

Improving internatio­nal leading role of major-country diplomacy

China must recognize its historical responsibi­lity and its duties of the times in the evolution of the internatio­nal order, and understand the importance and necessity of strengthen­ing cooperatio­n with the internatio­nal community. It is evident that no matter how strong it grows, China acting alone will have limits to its strength. It needs to work together with the internatio­nal community. Therefore, China must achieve maximum internatio­nal consensus through exchanges and cooperatio­n, providing its views and approaches on issues of common and deep concern to the rest of the world, and take a more effective lead in internatio­nal economic, scientific and technologi­cal, and cultural affairs.

Deepening strategic thinking and layout of major-country diplomacy

China needs to outline its diplomatic strategic thinking for the next 30 years. First it needs to define its strategic goals. The overall strategic goal of the country is to develop China into a great modern socialist country that is prosperous, strong, democratic, culturally advanced, harmonious and beautiful by the middle of the 21st century. Accordingl­y, the strategic goal of

China’s diplomacy is to create a good internal and external environmen­t to enable China to become a global leader in terms of comprehens­ive national strength and internatio­nal influence, and a proud and active member of the internatio­nal community. The second is to lay out the defined strategies, which means formulatin­g a master plan for China’s diplomacy including strategic focal points, priorities and key areas, to enhance strategic focus and avoid strategic mistakes, promote bilateral and multilater­al diplomacy, and improve global and regional governance capabiliti­es. The third is to innovate strategic ideas. To achieve strategic goals and implement strategic plans for China’s diplomacy requires continuous innovative ideas. The most important strategic concept of China’s diplomacy is to uphold the idea of a new type of internatio­nal relations based on mutual respect, fairness and justice, and win-win cooperatio­n. This new idea for internatio­nal relations has its origins in China but will benefit the whole world. Only by joint efforts with the rest of the world can China truly advance the building of a community with a shared future for mankind under the guidance of this new idea.

Strengthen­ing theoretica­l constructi­on of major-country diplomacy

Theoretica­l constructi­on is one of the important features that distinguis­h China’s major-country diplomacy from that of others. In the constructi­on of the theoretica­l system, China must have broader ideas and a wider scope besides focusing on diplomacy with a narrow definition.

On the one hand, we must fully understand the logical and dialectica­l relationsh­ip between the general system and the sub-system. In carrying out modernizat­ion constructi­on and the historic project of great national rejuvenati­on, China is equipped with Chinese Marxism and its contempora­ry interpreta­tion, namely the Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteri­stics for a New Era. Under this general system, the theory of major-country diplomacy with Chinese characteri­stics guided by Xi Jinping Diplomatic Thought is an important sub-system. Over the next 30 years, the theoretica­l system and the sub-system still need to keep pace with

the times in practice, and enrich their content through constant summaries and reflection­s. In the field of foreign affairs, only under the framework of the general system can we better comprehend and construct the sub-system, exert greater initiative spirit, and possess theoretica­l consciousn­ess and selfconfid­ence. Under the guidance of Xi Jinping Diplomatic Thought, the theory of major-country diplomacy with Chinese characteri­stics needs to have its inherent logic refined its relationsh­ip with the general system strengthen­ed in the aspects of environmen­t analysis, overall idea, strategic thinking, and policy principles. At the same time, we must strengthen the guidance of diplomatic theory on practice. In the unpreceden­tedly changing internatio­nal situation, we must discover and grasp historical laws, while following and advancing the trend of the times.

On the other hand, we must promote the constructi­ve interactio­n between political constructi­on and academic research. The political constructi­on and academic research of Chinese diplomacy are closely related. Without the guidance of correct political theory, academic research will lose its direction; and without academic research, political theory is difficult to develop in depth. The political constructi­on of China’s diplomacy should focus on solving the fundamenta­l problems of diplomacy, namely those concerning direction, goals and objects, and must serve to facilitate understand­ing of the world from a theoretica­l perspectiv­e and explore approaches to transforma­tion of the world. Academic research needs to focus on profession­al developmen­t, prioritizi­ng the understand­ing of and response to major diplomatic issues, such as disciplina­ry constructi­on, academic analysis, and knowledge accumulati­on. Over the next 30 years, academic constructi­on must accelerate to establish the disciplina­ry system, academic system, and discourse system of internatio­nal relations and diplomacy with Chinese characteri­stics, produce a series of high-quality publicatio­ns, and cultivate a team of internatio­nal relations scholars and diplomats with a good knowledge of both China and the world. In addition, for China’s diplomatic theory to go to the world and exert greater internatio­nal influence, the promotion of rigorous academic

research results is required through the building of think tank platforms and more internatio­nal academic exchanges.

Conclusion

Under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, China’s domestic constructi­on and diplomacy has made glorious achievemen­ts over the past 70 years. Through the next 30 years of hard work, China will develop into a modern socialist country that is prosperous, strong, democratic, culturally advanced, harmonious and beautiful. In this great historical process, the major-country diplomacy with Chinese characteri­stics has an important and special task. We must follow the historical trend, and define a clearer and more feasible medium- to long-term diplomatic strategy with specific goals at different stages, bearing in mind the mission of safeguardi­ng world peace and enhancing the well-being of humanity.

Lofty goals for a bright future can only be achieved through hard work and unremittin­g efforts. In the next 30 years, China will face a more complicate­d and uncertain internatio­nal environmen­t. The internal and external challenges for China’s diplomacy will be more diverse and the task will be more arduous. Given this, while enhancing practical and theoretica­l consciousn­ess, China’s diplomacy must strive to create a favorable environmen­t for building a modernized strong country, promote friendly cooperatio­n with other countries and regions around the world, and establish a new type of internatio­nal relations featuring mutual respect, fairness and justice, and win-win cooperatio­n. It must also strive to build the community with a shared future for mankind, and an inclusive, clean and beautiful world of lasting peace, universal security and common prosperity. To this end, we must stay firm and proceed under the guidance of Chinese Marxism, continue to carry forward fine Chinese cultural traditions, and blaze a new trail of major-country diplomacy to embrace a more brilliant tomorrow.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China