Contemporary World (English)

Trend of Internatio­nal Landscape Evolution and China’s Response against Backdrop of Covid-19

- Zhou Fangyin

The outbreak and spreading of Covid-19 have greatly impacted countries all over the world, making important difference­s in relations among major countries, world economy and global governance. It taps the balance of major powers’ strength and changes their strategic relations, thus inevitably influences the surroundin­gs for China's peaceful developmen­t.

COVID-19'S INFLUENCE ON DIRECTION OF INTERNATIO­NAL LANDSCAPE EVOLUTION

Internatio­nal landscape is mainly about two aspects: major countries’ strengths balance and their strategic relations, the former of which is the fundamenta­l factor, the latter also influentia­l on internatio­nal landscape. As a sudden global crisis, Covid-19 pandemic has brought about striking changes to the balance of strengths in the internatio­nal system as well as the strategic relations among major countries, which further impacts other aspects in the internatio­nal system.

Firstly, Covid-19 has caused phased changing of the balance of strengths among major countries. The global pandemic strongly impacts world economy, but all countries are not receiving the same result. Consequent­ly, the structure of strength within the internatio­nal system has changed. According to the World Economic Outlook updated in June, 2020 by IMF, the world GDP is predicted to drop by 4.9%, registerin­g the most serious yearly slump since the Great Depression. Considerin­g the global pandemic is still in process, the final loses of world economy remain a question, which may be even worse than the prediction.

China is the first country to receive the tremendous impact of Covid-19. But China stopped the spreading of the virus in a relatively short period of time by taking the most strict prevention measures, shifted to normalized prevention and control against the disease and fully promoted the resumption of production on these basis.

Covid-19 also strongly and continuous­ly strikes the economy of the United States, shown by that its stock exchange tripped circuit breaker four times within 10 days from March 9 to 18, 2020, together with the rocketing of unemployme­nt since the month. Washington’s handling of the coronaviru­s is of many problems and mistakes, such as CDC’s test kit failure due to contaminat­ion, short supply of urgently needed medical necessitie­s, disordered federal and state policies, blame game between the two parties, and massive substantia­l difficulti­es. They expose shortest rims of the most powerful country on this planet and the vulnerabil­ity of its economic and financial system and diminished internatio­nal community’s confidence in US capability and reliabilit­y.

Secondly, Covid-19 negatively affects US internatio­nal image and strategic credibilit­y, underminin­g its leadership in internatio­nal affairs. Since March 2020, the problems and mistakes of Washington is unimaginab­le in the context of history. US has registered much more cases and deaths than any other country and is still struggling in the failure to stop the virus’ wide spread after a long time, which contradict­s to people’s impression of US as the most powerful and the most technologi­cally advanced country, damaging US’ internatio­nal image. When US was short of material supply, it grabbed other countries’ all over the world, its internatio­nal image being broken. US government constantly attempts to blame China,

WHO and other sides for its own failure to combat the virus, which brings negative effects to both anti-coronaviru­s internatio­nal cooperatio­n and its own internatio­nal credibilit­y.

In the over 70 years since the end of World War II, the US has enjoyed its dominance of the world for long. However, its performanc­e completely fails other countries’ expectatio­n. Today, it is its own doings other than any other country’s uprising that inflict the most damages upon its leadership to the world. It takes both American willingnes­s and American capability to assume the leading role in the world against the backdrop of the world’s total war against Covid-19. For example, the US should offer masks, ventilator­s, PPE and other material supplies, as well as effective clinical solution and medicines, while encouragin­g other countries by showing strong will of American medical personnel.

The waning of American leadership during the handling of coronaviru­s, the global crises, is embodied in two aspects. On one hand, it failed to promote internatio­nal cooperatio­n within multilater­al mechanisms like UN, G20 and G7, not to mention reversing the deteriorat­ing situation of the global pandemic through cooperatio­n. On the other, countries all over the world, seldom turned to the US for help. Even its closest allies like the UK, Canada, Australia and Japan can hardly get any substantia­l assistance from it. Even though the situation in those countries improves, it’s not derived from cooperatio­n with the US.

Thirdly, the pandemic greatly impacts strategic relations of major countries, the most outstandin­g being the continued deteriorat­ing of ChinaUS relations. Under the pandemic, the US keeps exerting strategic pressure on China by constant reconnaiss­ance and provocativ­e military activities at the China's most difficult time to deal with the disease, its aircraft carrier “Roosevelt” sailing through South China Sea to visit Vietnam. It tried to add on China's security pressure when China was under the attack of Covid-19, attempting to find weak point of China's military by testing its strength in time of crisis. Malicious behavior as such completely betray American strategic intention against China.

Facing the strategic competitio­n between China and the US, European countries now have more complicate­d mentality and attitude. Since 2017, Trump administra­tion has sent a series of blows to internatio­nal order under the slogan of “America First”, underminin­g the relations between the US and European countries time and time again. The pandemic has exposed their divergence to an even larger extent and lowered the level of mutual trust and cooperatio­n. Meanwhile, when the balance of strength between internatio­nal systems is tilting toward the East,

almost all western countries become highly sensitive to the rise of China’s influence. When it comes to handling of the epidemic, they'd rather accept Korean mode, Japanese mode or Singaporea­n mode, other than recognize China’s practice. That’s where many western countries’ contradict­ive mentality comes from: they are discontent about some of American practices but mentally unready to see China play a leading role globally. Neverthele­ss, China’s efficiency in combating the virus domestical­ly and contributi­on to internatio­nal cooperatio­n objectivel­y causes impact on many westerners’ feelings.

Besides, the pandemic has witnessed the setback of the developmen­t of multilater­alism and insufficie­nt function of internatio­nal organizati­ons. Global governance is faced with greater challenges and power politics are gaining dominance. Since Trump assumed office, “America First” has become the guiding principle of his handling internatio­nal affairs. Instead of setting the long-term stability of internatio­nal order as a major goal of American foreign policy, his administra­tion prioritize­s national interests, especially those short-term, material and everyone-can-see interests. In order to maximize short-term interests, Trump administra­tion completely reversed American attitude to internatio­nal organizati­on and multilater­alism. Internatio­nal organizati­ons and multilater­al mechanisms see the weakening of their power of constraint on the US, while existing internatio­nal rules are receiving indiscrimi­nate violations by its government. When Covid-19 is spreading, in spite of that the world is in desperate need of internatio­nal cooperatio­n which is generally in accordance with the interests of the US, Trump administra­tion still takes negative attitude toward internatio­nal cooperatio­n. It not only caused the out-of-control of American domestic situation, but also disabled WHO, the most important internatio­nal organizati­on combating the pandemic, rendering it paralyzed to coordinate and organize internatio­nal efforts against Covid-19.

MAJOR APPROACHES FOR CHINA TO RESPOND TO NEW CHANGES IN INTERNATIO­NAL LANDSCAPE

In the backdrop of the spread of Covid-19, the changes in the balance of major states’ strength and their strategic relations make China’s external environmen­t for peaceful developmen­t more complex. China needs to proceed on its own strength building-up as well as promoting internatio­nal cooperatio­n against Covid-19. While seeking generally stable China-US relations for a long run, China also must strengthen cooperatio­n with neighborin­g countries in aspects such as the chain of value and non-traditiona­l security, continue to advocate multilater­alism, contribute more to internatio­nal organizati­ons, and safeguard the stability of internatio­nal order.

Firstly, China must manage to build up its strength while promoting multilater­alism and internatio­nal cooperatio­n. When nationalis­m and power politics are on the rise, multilater­alism and internatio­nal organizati­ons meeting setback, by increasing self-reliant survival and developmen­t ability of industrial chain and actively promoting industrial chain cooperatio­n with neighborin­g countries, especially with ASEAN, Japan and Korea under the framework of “10+3”, China can better offset negative effects by US’ potential hard “decoupling” in the field of high technology.

Covid-19 has severely impacted world economy and global industrial chain, eroding the root of countries’ capability to ensure their security. Abrupt and rampant pandemic has given an unimaginab­le heavy blow to global industrial chain. It serves as new lessons to the world: first, former global division of work produced supply chains which are too long and dispersed, any weak link possibly leading to suspended producing; second, backups and substitute­s are necessary for key links in the industrial chain in order to increase industrial chains’ resilience against external impacts and secure normal productivi­ty in crisis. The pandemic greatly enlightens countries about risk and crisis. Some countries will try to streamline their industrial chain, which means the tendency of regionaliz­ation of global industrial chain in the future.

Secondly, China must improve the quality of its partnershi­p by reinforcin­g internatio­nal cooperatio­n against Covid-19. High-level strategic partnershi­p is based on high-level strategic trust, which is usually fostered under special conditions and consolidat­ed by cruel material ordeal. In the relatively tranquil world after the Cold War, China and its partners mostly focused on winwin economic cooperatio­n but seldom faced shared difficulti­es.

Today, China’s shoulder-to-shoulder cooperatio­n with many countries to combat Covid-19 and overcome the crisis plays irreplacea­ble role in consolidat­ing its friendship with some countries. This shared challenge sheds light on China’s unique diplomacy for the world, helps other countries to better evaluate China’s capability to overcome crisis, see China’s resolution to continuous­ly cooperate with other countries when itself

The pandemic greatly enlightens countries about risk and crisis. Some countries will try to streamline their industrial chain, which means the tendency of regionaliz­ation of global industrial chain in the future.

is faced with tremendous difficulty, and profoundly understand China’s highly stable attitude toward internatio­nal cooperatio­n. The concept of cooperatio­n that has been upheld by China for long has fully shown its connotatio­n. China’s “saying less, doing more” practice, together with its indiscrimi­nating assistance to other countries to combat Covid-19, has displayed the right outlook on the choice between righteousn­ess and interests and enriched the connotatio­n of building a community with a shared future for humanity, which contribute­s to some countries’ stronger confidence in cooperatio­n with China.

Thirdly, China must seek for generally stable China-US relations from a far-sighted prospect. China should neither easily compromise to the US strategic pressure, nor actively escalate the conflict with US in the circumstan­ce where China-US strategic competitio­n is on the rise. To some extent, the difference­s in China and US’ performanc­e in combating the virus worsen the American strategy community’s anxiety about China’s growing strength, making the community include more confrontin­g mentality to US’ China policy. In this situation, China’s US policy must accord with its long-term fundamenta­l interests, slow the escalation of strategic competitio­n, and facilitate positive changes for China-US relations.

Although the US believes China’s rise challenges its global leadership, the stability of their relations answers to important interests of both countries. Because China has been upholding the concepts of peace, developmen­t, cooperatio­n and mutual benefit, actively developing diplomatic ties with all countries and possessing an important status in global industrial chain, it’s unfeasible for the US to comprehens­ively contain or “decouple” with China. Though some American officials have strong political will to “decouple” with China in the field of high technology, they have to face the high price the US has to pay for its decisive policy to realize true “decoupling” with China in that field.

Fourthly, China must reinforce cooperatio­n with neighborin­g countries over non-traditiona­l issues to improve surroundin­g security environmen­t. China is rising and regional order is at the brink of profound transition in AsiaPacifi­c. At this point, the US deliberate­ly manipulate­s hotspot issues around to exert strategic pressure on China. With the possibilit­y that China-US strategic competitio­n aggravates, the strategic pressure may spill over to the region in the future. Under this condition, renewed cooperatio­n with neighborin­g countries on non-traditiona­l issues is much more important than ever for restraint of negative effects to regional security by alliance politics, Indo-Pacific strategy and confrontat­ion of major countries, consolidat­ion of mutual trust between neighborin­g countries, and improvemen­t of regional security status.

While Covid-19 brings security challenge to the region as a non-traditiona­l security threat, it invents new motivation and opportunit­y for regional security cooperatio­n. Specially, it alters China’s neighborin­g countries’ understand­ing of the main origin of threat and the better measure to cope with it. In Post Pandemic era, China can join hands with ASEAN and other countries to explore cooperatio­n on non-traditiona­l security issues, focusing on solutions to their non-traditiona­l security problems, in order to improve the collective ability to deal with non-traditiona­l security threats.

Fifthly, China must safeguard the stability of existing internatio­nal order by actively support internatio­nal organizati­ons’ functionin­g from the prospect of maintainin­g multilater­alism and the internatio­nal system with UN as its core. Covid-19’s spread and frequent extreme weathers have proved the significan­ce of global cooperatio­n. However, since 2017, Trump administra­tion has given heavy blows to existed internatio­nal systems and rules, drasticall­y increasing uncertaint­y of existing systems and seriously affected the stability of internatio­nal order. In the backdrop of global pandemic of Covid-19, Trump administra­tion continues “America First” policy and puts it into action in a more extreme way, instead of advocating internatio­nal cooperatio­n and assuming the leading role in global combat against the pandemic. Because of Trump administra­tion’s policy, western countries see no leader in their battle against the pandemic and have to fight all by themselves, the results of their fighting remaining pessimisti­c.

The purpose of global governance is better coping with various global challenges in order to promote welfare of all countries. However, Trump administra­tion stands only for American interests, mainly care about whether it can benefit from global governance and even interpret the two major countries’ role in global governance from the prospect of transition of power. If its policy continues to origin from that prospect, global governance will face even bigger challenges in the future. When the US is constantly damaging internatio­nal organizati­ons and the internatio­nal order, China’s active support to the well-functionin­g of internatio­nal organizati­ons accords with most of the countries’ interests and needs. China is working hard for the peace, developmen­t and order of the world, thus becoming more important to internatio­nal order. For that reason, China can actively explore ways more easily accepted by internatio­nal community, so as to play its constructi­ve role in maintainin­g the stability of internatio­nal order more efficientl­y.

While Covid-19 brings security challenge to the region as a nontraditi­onal security threat, it invents new motivation and opportunit­y for regional security cooperatio­n.

 ??  ?? The COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted US economy. According to US Labor Department, by May 2, 2020, Insured Unemployme­nt in the country after seasonal readjustme­nt reached 22.83 million, a record high since the Great Depression of the 1930s. Photo shows the building of US labor Department, Washington, D.C.
The COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted US economy. According to US Labor Department, by May 2, 2020, Insured Unemployme­nt in the country after seasonal readjustme­nt reached 22.83 million, a record high since the Great Depression of the 1930s. Photo shows the building of US labor Department, Washington, D.C.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China