Global Times - Weekend

Smear campaign targets Xinjiang solar panels

►US expands ‘industry stifling’ scheme in disguise of human rights

- By GT staff reporters

First it was cotton; now it’s Xinjiang’s solar panels that are being targeted. Both are pillar industries of Xinjiang in Northwest China, and they have become the target of what appears to be a malicious campaign launched by Western anti-China forces to destroy Xinjiang’s rapidly ascending economy and ultimately obstruct the developmen­t of China.

These forces behind the campaign position themselves as saviors and claim to counter a “genocide” in Xinjiang, but what they are doing is essentiall­y attempting to wipe out the industries and the bread and butter of over 25 million people in Xinjiang, locals, businesses and experts said.

Unlike the campaign against Xinjiang’s cotton, which was led by political forces, the latest campaign against the photovolta­ic (PV) industry appears to be pushed by forces within the PV industry that have been overwhelme­d by Chinese firms, including those in Xinjiang, for years, in an apparent ill attempt to use politics to crack down on what they can’t compete with in the market, analysts pointed out. Such a shift in trend poses a serious threat for other industries in Xinjiang and around the country and demands

forceful countermea­sures, they said.

As the debate on the so-called forced labor issue in the Chinese solar energy industry has been hyped up lately following the West’s groundless smearing on Xinjiang cotton, Chinese experts and solar energy insiders warned that the US is setting a trap and a pattern, step by step, to destroy Xinjiang’s competitiv­e industries, even with an aim to bring about the collapse of Xinjiang’s economy and local people’s livelihood.

Once finding the approach of giving a bad name to the Chinese industry useful by citing “human rights abuses” or “forced labor,” capital and interest groups may copy the smearing and boycott approach to stifle Xinjiang’s industries, experts warned.

The Global Times interviewe­d a local polys silicon giant and found that the so-called forced la labor in the region’s PV industry is simply another lie created by certain media outlets, US trade groups and politician­s.

“The workers from ethnic minority groups are mainly hired online, from universiti­es and colleges, talent markets and by employee referrals. They enjoy paid annual leave, home visits with subsidies, wedding cash gifts, year-end bonuses and holiday gifts,” Zhang Longgen, deputy chairman of Xinjiang Daqo, one of the four major Chinese polysilico­n manufactur­ers, told the Global Times, denying any employment from Xinjiang’s vocational education and training centers as reported by Bloomberg, the New York Times, POLITICO and so on.

Xinjiang Daqo’s production accounted for around 15 percent of the global market share in 2020. “Silicon wafer producers are the customers of polysilico­n. Around 97 percent of the global silicon wafers are made in China. All our products are sold in China,” Zhang said.

“The ridiculous thing is that the US forcibly distorts facts and smears all the good things we have done that benefited the ethnic minority groups in Xinjiang,” Zhang said.

By doing so, the US would strike a blow to China’s, even the world’s, solar energy sector and hurt the interests of ethnic groups in Xinjiang, he said.

At Xinjiang Daqo, 18 out of 1,934 workers are from ethnic minority groups. The average monthly salary at Xinjiang Daqo is 7,300 yuan ($1,118), compared with the average monthly salary of 6,617 yuan in Xinjiang’s non-private sector and 3,825 yuan in the private sector in 2019.

“The proportion of labor costs in

our company is less than 7 percent, so polysilico­n manufactur­ing is not a labor-intensive industry,” Zhang pointed out.

Dismissing a Bloomberg report on Tuesday which said “there’s no freedom to refuse to sign factory contracts” for workers in Xinjiang, Zhang said some Western media’s reports on Xinjiang came out of the reporters’ “fertile imaginatio­n.”

“Forced labor is not only unethical but also illegal in China. We have examined our suppliers recently and found no behavior of ‘forced labor,’” Zhang said, adding the company’s employee turnover rate is less than 3 percent.

Echoing Zhang, a 39-year-old ethnic Mongolian worker named Bajin, said the so-called forced labor has never existed in the factory since he came to work for the company in May 2011, and none of his friends have ever complained about being forced to work in Xinjiang.

“I work eight hours per day and get two days off per week. I feel workers from ethnic minority groups at our company can even get extra care from our supervisor­s. So the Western countries’ smearing is intentiona­l to disturb ethnic unity in Xinjiang as well as our country’s fast developmen­t,” Bajin told the Global Times.

Smearing campaign

Zhang said he had smelled the conspiracy in the air for months, as he noticed that the share price of the US-listed Daqo New Energy Corp, the parent company of Xinjiang Daqo, dive from $130 to the current $67, dropping by approximat­ely 52 percent in just two months.

Another Chinese PV giant Jinko Solar also suffered from short selling at the US stock market.

“We expressed strong condemnati­on to the groundless and irresponsi­ble media reports that turned things upside down,” Zhang noted.

The pace interestin­gly is in line with a report released in a publicatio­n by consulting firm Horizon Advisory in January, which claimed that “forced labor” is being used in the Chinese

PV supply chain.

It is clear that the US has a map to crack down on China’s PV industry, as it first started from a trade group’s instigatio­n, then to a further upgrading by US politician­s, and “the reason behind it is that China’s rapid growth in the solar energy sector moved the cheese of US companies,” according to Dai.

Dai said that before 2010, the polysilico­n used in global solar energy had been monopolize­d by US and German enterprise­s, which had profiteere­d Chinese PV firms by forcing the them to sign longterm contracts (some are 10 years) with them.

Over more than a decade after China ramped up efforts in developing the PV industry, the price of polysilico­n has dropped from $400-500 per kilogram in foreign companies before 2010 to $20 per kilogram in Chinese companies now, the practition­er noted.

Global Times reporters also found out over the past two years that many US business and trade representa­tives have cited the PV industry as a “classic case” when talking about the ChinaUS trade frictions.

The duties and crackdown policies have not beaten down China’s PV industry, which disappoint­ed the US.

Analysts said that in addition to strengthen­ing the efforts to combat climate change, his aim was also to catch up the pace in the PV sector with other countries and even regain an upper hand, as major countries around the world embrace a green future in front of the crisis of global warming and climate change.

What also concerned the US businessme­n is the US’ high dependency on China in the PV supply chain, as Chinese companies have both lower costs and technologi­cal superiorit­y, particular­ly in large size silicon wafers and granular silicon.

According to a report by McKinsey & Co in 2018, China’s PV industry competitiv­eness surpassed the US by a lot. Among the top 10 global PV modules enterprise­s in 2020, three came from China and only one came from the US.

Zhang also cited statistics from the China Photovolta­ic Industry Associatio­n to prove the country’s PV supply could make tremendous contributi­ons to the world’s renewable energy transforma­tion: Chinese raw material of silicon accounts for 67 percent of global share, wafers 97 percent, solar cells 79 percent and PV modules 71 percent.

Destroying value chain

It looks like the tactics of the PV industry have some water splash.

In a list of questions regarding alleged “forced labor” in Xinjiang, several members of the Dutch parliament urged the Netherland­s government to explain if it is aware that solar PV panels and other components imported from China may contain raw materials from Xinjiang, according to local media reports.

Regarding the previous action on Xinjiang cotton, and now the PV industry, which accounts for 80-90 percent of the world’s PV modules supply, Chinese experts warned that other industries, such as mechanical and electrical products, electric power and petroleum, could also be the next targets, and the US government is trying to suffocate or even kill Xinjiang’s outstandin­g industries, with the help of some other Western countries.

“It looks like the US wants Xinjiang’s competitiv­e industries to die out in the region, so far namely cotton and solar energy, but in fact, it is destroying China’s participat­ion in the global value chain,” Wang Yao, a research fellow specializi­ng in border areas at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times.

The exports of mechanical and electrical products in Xinjiang are also vibrant, and countries along the Belt and Road are the main buyers. In 2019, mechanical and electrical products championed the most popular exported goods in Xinjiang, with the export value hitting 33.79 billion yuan, accounting for 27 percent of the region’s total exports.

After seeing fruitful results of slandering Xinjiang cotton, the cards of Xinjiang human rights and “forced labor” might be a “master key” for the US to hit any industry of Xinjiang, Wang warned, saying electric power and petroleum are very likely to be the next targets.

“The choice of polysilico­n is different from that of cotton, as the costs of cotton produced in China remain higher than that produced in the US, Brazil and Australia,” Gao Lingyun, an expert at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences in Beijing who closely follows China-US bilateral trade, told the Global Times on Friday.

That means, with the lower-cost advantage of PV products, this round of crackdown on Xinjiang polysilico­n will not succeed, according to Gao.

 ??  ??
 ?? Photo: Courtesy of Xinjiang Daqo ?? The production base of Xinjiang Daqo New Energy Co.
Photo: Courtesy of Xinjiang Daqo The production base of Xinjiang Daqo New Energy Co.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China