Global Times

Time for Australia to think hard about its relationsh­ip with China

- By Xu Haijing

The 45th anniversar­y of the establishm­ent of diplomatic relations between China and Australia, on December 21, could have been a perfect moment for both countries to reflect on the great achievemen­ts of bilateral relations. However, due to the current anti-China chorus in Australia, it should instead be a time for Australia to think through what kind of relations it really wants with China.

China and Australia have strong economic complement­arity. For instance, Australia’s iron ore has been a much-needed raw material for China’s infrastruc­ture. Closer economic ties have led to deeper political trust, more people-to-people links and more cultural exchanges.

China has become, for eight consecutiv­e years, Australia’s largest trading partner, largest export market and largest source of imports.

Statistics show that in 2016, the total volume of bilateral trade between China and Australia reached $107.9 billion, 1,300 times the volume reached when diplomatic ties were first establishe­d.

Implemente­d in December 2015, the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA) has been warmly welcomed in both countries. Thanks to ChAFTA and its tariff reduction arrangemen­ts, China has replaced the US to become the largest export market for Australian wine.

There are about 200,000 Chinese students studying in Australian universiti­es and schools, which is a good source of funding for those Australian institutio­ns.

Moreover, two-way travel totaled 2 million in 2016, among them more than 1.3 million were Chinese travelers who visited Australia, making the greatest contributi­on to Australian tourism revenue among all internatio­nal visitors.

All these facts and figures are what both government­s could be proud of. However, Australia seems to care little about it. Over the past 11 months, some Australian politician­s and media have been obsessed with one thing, that is, criticizin­g China.

A quick review of the comments on China by leading Australian political figures tells us how negatively they viewed China, China’s political system and the prospect of its developmen­t.

In March, Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop said bluntly that China will not reach its full economic potential if China maintains its current political system.

In June, the country’s Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull pointed fingers at China’s South China Sea policy. Yet the allegation that the commercial route through the South China Sea might be threatened by China has long been proved groundless by Australian experts.

Australian media quickly sensed the smell and bombed the public with fabricated news about the so-called Chinese influence and infiltrati­on in Australia.

In their reports, Chinese investment­s were ill-intentione­d to grab Australia’s strategic assets, when they tried to invest in Australia’s cattle stations. Chinese students were ill-intentione­d to undermine Australia’s academic independen­ce, when they dared to challenge their teachers with China’s official opinions. Moreover, Chinese living in Australia were ill-intentione­d to interfere with Australian domestic politics, when they made donations to Australian political parties, despite the fact that political donations are legal in Australia.

Some Australian political figures and media are going even further to hype China resentment and China containmen­t. In this sense, the strongly-worded statement by the spokespers­on of the Chinese Embassy in Australia serves as a timely wake-up call.

The great economic complement­arity between China and Australia is still there. The two countries could enjoy even greater bilateral relations in the next 45 years. But it will not be possible if Australia continues to undermine bilateral political trust and poisons the people-topeople relationsh­ip.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China