Global Times

US obsession with trade war costs Americans more

- By Liu Jie and Cheng Yunjie

After the Trump administra­tion threatened to slap additional tariffs on goods from US major trading partners, grievances have been aired on its home turf.

Manufactur­ers in the Rust Belt fear additional tariffs would antagonize their longstandi­ng trade partners, leading to a decrease in exports. Soybean farmers throughout the Midwest are nervously watching how China, which buys a quarter of American soybeans, will respond in kind.

Traditiona­l steel and aluminum manufactur­ers in the Great Lake states may benefit from the administra­tion’s 25-percent tariff on foreign steel, but for those who use the metal, it is an entirely different story. Metal users are paying higher prices. It is not strange that beverage producers fret about the impending price rises of aluminum cans, which will be passed on to consumers.

Never forget the fact that, trade with China allowed American families to save $850 per household in 2015, a study by the US China Business Council shows. This benefit brought by Chinese exports to the US consumers will be gone, and higher import duties will tax American consumers more.

Economists also doubt the Trump administra­tion’s stubborn thoughts on trade deficit. Stephen Roach, former chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia and senior fellow at Yale University’s Jackson Institute for Global Affairs, said with the domestic saving rate at just 1.5 percent of national income in the first quarter of 2018, US multilater­al trade deficit with 102 nations is unavoidabl­e.

Roach has warned that trying to cure multilater­al deficits with bilateral tariffs such as those being imposed on China can only backfire – shifting the Chinese piece of the US trade deficit to higher cost producers and thereby taxing American consumers.

“President Trump’s trade fix runs counter to his avowed promise to make America great again,” he said.

Neverthele­ss, the Trump administra­tion has doubled down on its unilateral­ism and protection­ism by threatenin­g to slap additional tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods.

This came two days after tariffs on $50 billion of Chinese imports were announced, just weeks after Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said his country put a trade war with China on hold. It should be noted that the storyline of the China-US trade spat could have been less combative, and the Americans do not necessaril­y have to bear the costs of a trade war.

According to the spokespers­on of China’s Ministry of Commerce, during their previous rounds of talks, Chinese and American negotiator­s had once “borne fruit with clear negotiatio­n roadmaps and timetables.” In other words, if the Trump administra­tion didn’t re-announce additional tariffs against Chinese products, both sides would have planned further consultati­ons on manufactur­ing and services, as well as structural problems, after making detailed consultati­ons on agricultur­e and energy.

To enhance the resilience and competitiv­eness of the American economy, the US government needs to foster a business and trade environmen­t deemed by its major trading partners as reasonable and predictabl­e. On the contrary, the US government is hectically putting up trade barriers, restrictin­g foreign investment and alienating its major trading partners.

Every act has its consequenc­es. The false passion of the US administra­tion is tarnishing the credibilit­y and internatio­nal image of the world’s biggest economy, which will be another expensive mistake that the Americans have to deal with.

When business environmen­t becomes less predictabl­e, foreign investors will leave, and so will jobs. America’s domestic industrial chains will be forced to make a change.

China is cutting tariffs across the board. Effective on July 1, China’s average tariff rate for clothing, shoes and hats, kitchenwar­e, and sports and fitness supplies will be reduced by 50 percent, and that for home appliances will be lowered by two-thirds. Import taxes on vehicles and auto parts will also be slashed.

But these incentives to foreign companies might have nothing to do with American manufactur­ers as the US administra­tion is seemingly making all out efforts to have the US left out.

For decades, bilateral trade has been taken as the cornerston­e of China-US relations. At this moment, the cornerston­e is being shaken by the US side.

How can the US government assure its people a journey ahead safe and sound while stirring up monstrous sea waves for China? Sadly, it seems that unless the Trump administra­tion feels the pinch of a trade war, the American people will not be freed from the unnecessar­y costs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China