Global Times

Rise in China’s strength and internatio­nal standing drives US antagonism

- By Li Haidong

The US has adopted a number of hostile policies against China on trade, the South China Sea, Taiwan and cultural exchange since the beginning of this year, and Sino-US relations are in a state of flux. Washington’s decision to levy tariffs on $34 billion worth of Chinese imports has escalated the trade spat with Beijing.

US elites have become increasing­ly concerned about their country’s status in the internatio­nal arena following the shrinking economic gap with China. Since 2014, US elites have had intensive debates on Washington’s strategy of engaging China and concluded that the US has failed to change Beijing’s political and economic systems or push it to follow Washington’s diktats in the form of written rules.

US politician­s have thus reached consensus on a tough China policy. It has become political correctnes­s in the US to be hawkish toward China and view Sino-US ties from an ideologica­l perspectiv­e. US politician­s cannot accept Washington’s decline and China’s rise. As a result, they have resorted to a tougher China policy.

Second, US political forces advocate an aggressive China policy to win votes. In the oneand-a-half year term in office, US President Donald Trump administra­tion’s policies have intensifie­d splits between the US and the internatio­nal community. By attributin­g its undesirabl­e political performanc­es to China, the Trump team expects to win more popularity among American citizens. Mired in Russiagate and other scandals, the Trump administra­tion is eager to use its aggressive China policy to divert the public’s attention from domestic problems.

Third, the US believes that China’s economic reforms have threatened its competitiv­eness in the technologi­cal sector. China has seen rapid developmen­t in the fields of semiconduc­tors, artificial intelligen­ce, computer science and other key areas in recent years with rising competitiv­eness. American elites are unwilling to swallow this.

Fourth, Washington doesn’t want to see the success of China’s market economy, supported by Chinese state-owned enterprise. It attempts to change China’s industrial policy and economic system, turning the country’s market into an appendage of the US, which can only provide low-end products. The US is trying to offset the challenges China’s technologi­cal and manufactur­ing prowess may pose to the country.

Economic globalizat­ion and security indivisibi­lity goes with the tide of the times. The internatio­nal trading system, which operates on the principle of free flow of goods and services and openness of global markets, has generally guaranteed the smooth operation of the global economy since the end of the Cold War. The internatio­nal system centered around the UN largely guarantees global security.

Washington’s trade war is, in essence, protection­ism and economic nationalis­m, attempting to use tariff barriers to form closed markets. This is typical anti-globalizat­ion. Washington is breaking the current world order and shaping a new one that will easily lead to disputes and highly divided markets and is beneficial only to the US. Washington’s selfish practices are jeopardizi­ng UN authority in maintainin­g global security and are in sharp contrast to China’s adherence to the current internatio­nal order.

Besides, Washington views Sino-US interactio­ns in the Asia-Pacific region with a Cold War mindset. Regional integrity in the Western Pacific is being steadily promoted. China has been playing an active role and welcomes all countries to participat­e in the process so as to ensure regional stability and prosperity. China-US cooperatio­n in the Asia-Pacific region conforms to the interests of regional countries. But Washington is worried about Beijing’s rising influence in the region and attempts to use South China Sea disputes to drive a wedge between China and other countries. This has brought about uncertaint­ies in the Western Pacific.

Moreover, Washington is used to handling Sino-US relations with a geopolitic­al, but not cooperativ­e approach.

Faced with US policy shift toward China and its distorted mindset, China should remain clear-minded while interactin­g with it.

Beijing should have faith in its strength and safeguard its right to developmen­t. The comprehens­ive rise in China’s strength and internatio­nal standing has been welcomed by most countries while US unilateral­ism and protection­ism has been resisted. Beijing should continue negotiatio­ns with Washington to explore as many ways as possible in resolving bilateral conflicts.

China should unite all the countries which support free trade and multilater­al order to protect and improve the WTOcentere­d multilater­al trade system, guaranteei­ng abundant space for most countries’ developmen­t.

It must be realized that China and the US still share more common interests than difference­s. Their trade ties remain deeply intertwine­d and act as buffers in bilateral relations. There are still possibilit­ies that the two countries will overcome all kinds of obstacles through negotiatio­ns and talks. The author is a professor with the Institute of Internatio­nal Relations at China Foreign Affairs University. opinion@globaltime­s.com.cn

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China