Global Times

US AIDS NGOs react with surprise, indignatio­n after Trump’s promise

- By Peter Mertz The author is a writer with the Xinhua News Agency. opinion@ globaltime­s.com.cn

Reaction ranged from being hopeful to incredulou­s after US President Donald Trump’s promise to eliminate AIDS in the US by 2030.

Trump’s bold statement in his second State of the Union address Tuesday first triggered words of hope from US’ embattled front-line groups that fight the deadly disease. However, after the dust had settled, pundits started forcing the president’s hand.

“The entire statement by Trump is a diversion away from his big problems,” said Washington policy analyst David B. Richardson on Thursday.

“A complete distractio­n,” Richardson told Xinhua, noting that the president’s tax returns, his involvemen­t with Russian interferen­ce in the 2016 presidenti­al elections, and the Democratic­ally-controlled House of Representa­tives, had made Trump “desperate for diversions.”

“Scientific breakthrou­ghs” made the goal attainable, Trump said, whose announceme­nt was old news for health organizati­ons, including the United Nations, which years ago called for steps to end the HIV epidemic by 2030.

Robert Redfield, director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), said in March 2017 that it was possible to end the AIDS in less than seven years.

Trump also piggybacke­d on a 2010 HIV strategy outlined by then President Barack Obama that focused on lowering the infection rate and increasing access to medical care.

“He’s just throwing ideas into the wind so the media gobbles them up in the hope it distracts them away from his possible impeachmen­t,” said Richardson, a policy analyst on Capitol Hill in the 1980s.

The first reported case of AIDS in the US was in 1981. Since then, more than 700,000 people with AIDS have died in the US, according to the CDC. Today, there are over 1.1 million people living with HIV and nearly 40,000 new diagnoses each year.

AIDS has no cure, but daily doses of antiretrov­iral medication­s have allowed victims to live relatively long and healthy lives. However only half of all people living with HIV are virally suppressed.

On Tuesday night, along with his consistent banter about immigratio­n and the questionab­le achievemen­ts of his two years in office, Trump unleashed the surprise of his 82-minute speech.

“My budget will ask Democrats and Republican­s to make the needed commitment to eliminate the HIV epidemic in the United States within 10 years,” the president said.

“Together, we will defeat AIDS in America and beyond,” he added.

Insiders told Xinhua that the final words: “and beyond,” were not part of Trump’s written speech, but adlibbed by the president at the last minute.

Health Secretary Alex M. Azar II said Trump will seek “substantia­l new funds for the effort,” another remark that stunned both Democrats and Republican­s.

Projection­s from the White House’s Office of Management and Budget say the federal budget deficit will reach $1 trillion in 2019, roughly $101 billion more than previously projected.

Trump, who campaigned on a balanced budget and reducing federal expenditur­es, apparently on Tuesday added another big expense to the deficit. Financial details of the new AIDS initiative are expected next month.

However, Trump’s 2019 financial year budget, submitted in February 2018, includes cutting $40 million from the CDC’s HIV prevention programs, and $26 million from federal housing programs for people living with AIDS, as well as cutting global HIV programs by $1 billion, according to the Congressio­nal Budget Office.

On Wednesday, the nonprofit AIDS United posted an open letter reacting to Trump’s speech – signed by 22 of the nation’s leading anti-AIDS advocates, including groups in San Francisco, Chicago, and Texas.

“We know what it will take to end the HIV epidemic in the US by 2030,” the letter began.

“The real proof will be in the President’s FY 2020 budget request next month,” it ended.

Although AIDS Institute’s Michael Ruppal said the plan “can go down in history as one of the most significan­t achievemen­ts of his presidency,” other experts were quick to note the incongruit­y between the president’s words and deeds.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China