Global Times

Chinese firms can defend interests

- By Hu Weijia

China’s Huawei has started to fight back. The telecoms giant has threatened legal action against the Czech Republic, the New York Times reported, after authoritie­s there issued warnings about the risk the company posed to the nation’s critical infrastruc­ture.

The warning potentiall­y creates obstacles for the normal operation of Huawei in Europe and undermines the company’s reputation. The move may be followed by other countries and spark a domino effect around the world.

Although some members of the Czech government have made commendabl­e efforts to mitigate the situation, the warning has already caused economic losses for the Chinese telecoms giant.

The effect of the US intentiona­lly putting restrictio­ns on Huawei is spilling over, as some Western countries follow the US lead in questionin­g whether using Huawei’s equipment means a risk to national security.

Huawei shouldn’t let them spread rumors without paying a price. The US can’t be allowed to arbitraril­y advance unilateral­ism to further heighten pressure on its allies over the Huawei issue. The Chinese firm should resort to local laws or internatio­nal arbitratio­n to safeguard its legitimate interests. Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei has maintained a low profile in the media, even though his business has grown very fast. In recent years, Chinese enterprise­s have become more mature with enhanced global influence and competitiv­eness, but most of them follow the same practice as they go abroad and keep out of the spotlight.

Chinese entreprene­urs are usually unwilling to start a conflict with foreign authoritie­s. They are influenced by traditiona­l Chinese philosophy that suggests friendline­ss is conducive to business success. Now, they must learn how to fight back to safeguard their legitimate interests in overseas markets.

If Huawei thinks the attitude of foreign government agencies has resulted in the infringeme­nt of its legal rights, the company has the full right to take legal action against those authoritie­s. Huawei is a privately owned enterprise, so its move does not represent the attitude of the Chinese government.

China enjoys a sound relationsh­ip with the Czech Republic but we support Chinese enterprise­s, Huawei included, in taking legal action to safeguard their interests.

Under increasing pressure from the US, many countries face a tough decision over the question of whether they should ban Huawei from their 5G networks. If those countries don’t want to side with either the US or China over the Huawei issue, they can hire thirdparty agencies to assess the qualificat­ion of their 5G suppliers.

With the boom of outbound investment, China has more possibilit­ies to collide with the West. Legal action is the best way to avert serious economic conflicts. In this respect, Huawei is serving as a pathfinder for Chinese enterprise­s, which need to speak up in defense of their own interests.

The author is a reporter with the Global Times. bizopinion@ globaltime­s.com.cn

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China