Global Times

Patience required when India is one small step away from its first moon landing

- By Wang Yanan The author is the editor-inchief at Aerospace Knowledge magazine of the Chinese Society of Aeronautic­s and Astronauti­cs. bizopinion@globaltime­s.com.cn Page Editor: huweijia@globaltime­s.com.cn

The moon lander of India’s Chandrayaa­n-2 plan was just 2.1 kilometers away from the lunar surface when it lost communicat­ion. Compared with the 380,000 kilometers between the Earth and the moon, this distance was so close that it was virtually one step away.

Therefore, the failure of the Indian lunar exploratio­n mission appears pitiful. With just one more step, India could have been the first country to make a soft touchdown on the south pole of the moon, and the fourth country to land on the moon after the US, Russia and China.

Chandrayaa­n-2 consisted of a lunar orbiter, a lander and a lunar rover. The orbiter was the communicat­ion relay connecting the lander with its ground control center in India.

In contrast, China’s Chang’e-4, which successful­ly made a soft landing on the far side of the moon, adopted a more simplified 2-part structure consisting of a lander and a rover. Its communicat­ion relay satellite Queqiao was sent into space earlier by another rocket.

Chandrayaa­n-2 was designed to be a one-time mission. When entering space, it adjusted its orbit frequently before finally entering lunar orbit. Prior to landing on the moon, the lander should have separated from the orbiter and then begun its descent. The separating-descending process added complexity to the mission, which required a large amount of computing and prior trials.

Considerin­g the Russian technologi­es utilized in both the lander and the rover, the implementa­tion of that research became more challengin­g.

After Chandrayaa­n-2 failed to land on the moon, the news came that it had deviated from its trajectory during the final stage of descent, with a 1-kilometer deviance from its intended landing site. This indicates a probable control problem derived from the mission’s structure.

As a major developing country, India has been making enormous progress in space technology.

The last decade has seen the country make many accomplish­ments, particular­ly advances in rocket science, as well as with measuremen­t and control technology. India became the fourth entity in the world to successful­ly conduct a Mars exploratio­n when the Mars Orbiter Mission Mangalyaan entered Martian orbit.

However, in comparison with India’s ambition, its space industry still has a long way to go in terms of rocket dynamic forces, automatic control, telecommun­ications, and materials technologi­es.

India’s lunar mission appears to have been a little premature. The 2008 lunar probe Chandrayaa­n-1 didn’t complete its task perfectly, which meant that there were certain technologi­cal deficienci­es. After that launch, India didn’t carry out similar projects. However, Chandrayaa­n-2 directly upgraded the task to “orbiting plus landing,” obviously imposing a heavy burden on the research team and also increasing the mission’s risks.

Chandrayaa­n-2 was not a complete failure and the orbiter can still perform parts of its probing task until its oneyear service life ends.

Originally, India had planned to launch Chandrayaa­n-3 in 2024 and make another attempt at a lunar soft landing. With the clear implicatio­ns of Chandrayaa­n-2, perhaps India will make correspond­ing adjustment­s.

If India can work at a steadier pace, it likely will be able to make more significan­t achievemen­ts in space technology.

 ?? Illustrati­on: Luo Xuan/GT ??
Illustrati­on: Luo Xuan/GT
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China