HK political battle to intensify
▶ Pan-democrats unable to decide chief executive: adviser
After pan-democratic groups scored a big win in the district council elections on Sunday, a leading adviser of Beijing’s top think tank on Hong Kong affairs predicted that the political battle would further intensify in the city. The opposition may gain 40 percent of seats at the Election Committee, but they won’t be able to decide who will be the chief executive as the majority is still in the hands of the pro-establishment camp.
The latest district council election took place amid social unrest, which hardly delivered a clear message. After the opposition groups won by a landslide, they will use district councils as their base for continuing political battle, turning the district council, usually place to address issues related to people’s livelihood, to a highly politicized place to exert influence on public opinion and create pressure on authorities, Lau Siu-kai, the vice-president of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macao Studies, told the Global Times in an interview on Wednesday.
Pan-democratic groups won 388 out of 452 seats in Sun
day’s elections, controlling the majority of the district councils, while Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong gained only 59 seats, a result significantly different from last elections when the latter controlled the majority of seats years ago.
“Although opposition camp won the victory, about 40 percent voted for pro-establishment camp, showing that the fundamental base of supporters for the camp has not changed,” Lau said.
The voting results show there has been no significant gap between pan-democratic camp and the proestablishment party, as the latter took about 45 percent of total votes, and the opposition force took around 60 percent. Considering the system of a “single-seat, single-vote” electoral system, the opposition force could gain a majority of the seats, Lau said.
“The fundamental support base for the pro-establishment party has not changed, and some candidates even gained votes compared to the previous elections,” he noted.
The turnout at this year’s elections surpassed 70 percent, the highest in history, and many newly registered voters are youngsters who have been voicing opposition toward the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region government during months of antigovernment protests, which have escalated into violence.
In the past, the voter turnout for district council elections was relatively low, as not many people were interested in electing members who deal with social and livelihood issues. “However, it has been becoming more politicized, about political agenda and political parties,” Lau said, noting that although it’s abnormal, the district council still remains an advisory body that exerts a certain influence on policymakers.
There are no clear boundaries as to what role district council could play, which gives room for council members to bring up political topics and agenda, further influencing public opinion, Lau noted.
“Scoring a big win at the district council election won’t guarantee pandemocratic groups could seek further influence on government’s policies, or take control of the authority,” Lau said, noting that the final say is still in the hands of the SAR government over policy implementation.
While some raised questions about why the majority of Hong Kong people votes for opposition groups, reflecting an anti-Beijing public opinion, Lau claimed that such claim has been exaggerated.
When Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping proposed the “one country, two systems” principle, he never asked Hong Kong people to love the Communist Party of China, Lau noted. “Hong Kong could always maintain its original system, lifestyle and values, including its recognition of Western values,” he said, adding that as such, Hong Kong people would be assured and the city could continue playing its unique role of connecting China with the West.
Reflection needed
The pro-establishment group and HKSAR government said they would seriously reflect on a general mood that is unsatisfied with the way the authority governs, which resulted in the election results.
However, Lau, the senior adviser to both HKSAR government and the central government, said defeat in the elections would enhance crisis awareness, helping to enhance solidarity among Beijing, HKSAR government and the pro-establishment camp.
“Although it has not shaken Hong Kong’s fundamental political landscape so far, the HKSAR government is urged to cooperate with the proestablishment camp and to change its stance of governing without taking others’ suggestions into account,” Lau said.
While pro-democrats’ control of district council may further exert influence on election commission for selecting the chief executive, Beijing is expected to reconsider its policies concerning Hong Kong affairs.
Further measures
The Hong Kong government should come up with preventive measures as Beijing would never tolerate an opposition force posing a threat to national sovereignty, Lau said.
Western media and politicians praised the district council elections as “de facto referendum on Hong Kong democracy,” but Lau said the “one country, two systems” is still the best arrangement.
Opposition groups in Hong Kong, echoing values and expectation of Western countries, may continue confronting the central government, when the West continues to smear the Chinese model of development as populism rises in the world.
“But they need to understand that keeping political position in line with national interests is the only way to maintain ‘one country, two systems’ principle that ensures the future of Hong Kong,” Lau said.