Global Times

‘ Insufficie­nt evidence’ for Xinjiang ‘ genocide’

US State Department office’s report shows claims are politicall­y driven

- By Zhang Han and Leng Shumei

A recent exclusive report by Foreign Policy said that the US State Department’s Office of the Legal Advisor had concluded after a review that there was not sufficient evidence to prove so- called genocide in Northwest China’s Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, which Chinese analysts took as further demonstrat­ion that the judgment of “genocide” was politicall­y driven and without evidence, and even the US State Department itself cannot present a legal basis for the decision.

But it is still too early to know how much the review by the advisory body can influence the Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s decision and the Biden administra­tion’s policies concerning Xinjiang, analysts said, warning that the US would not stop using Xinjiangre­lated issues to contain China.

The US State Department released former secretary of state Mike Pompeo’s “determinat­ion” on “atrocities in Xinjiang” on January 19, a day before the end of Donald Trump’s presidency, which said he believed that “genocide” is ongoing in the region.

Foreign Policy reported on Friday that a State Department review during the final weeks of the Trump administra­tion of China’s conduct in Xinjiang pitted the department’s lawyers against advocates of a genocide determinat­ion.

The current conclusion of the State Department lawyers does not constitute a judgment that genocide did not occur in Xinjiang, but it reflects the difficulti­es of proving genocide, read the report.

The power of whether to “decide genocide” is in hands of the State Department, and Blinken could just ignore the review by the Office of the Legal Advisor, according to Jia Chunyang, an expert at the China Institutes of Contempora­ry Internatio­nal Relations.

Blinken, who is Pompeo’s successor, said on January 19 that president Trump was “was right” to take a “tougher approach to China,” media said.

It is obvious that the genocide accusation is political slander without any proof, but that reflects the tone of the Biden administra­tion’s hardline strategy on China over Xinjiang affairs, Jia said, noting Blinken’s declaratio­n means that he can hardly back off, otherwise he would be criticized as inconsiste­nt and unreliable.

The expert said that with or without the State Department’s “decision,” anti- China US politician­s will not give up pushing Xinjiang- related acts in the US Congress to contain China.

Lü Xiang, an expert in US studies with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences in Beijing, said that the Biden administra­tion is still evaluating the situation to form its package of policies in different areas.

The US faces the dilemma of being willing to contain China but lacking the resources, given so many domestic crises, he said.

Observers noted that Biden administra­tion will not be radical in foreign policy overall, and detailed actions in different areas are still in formation. It will continue to play the “Xinjiang card,” but the question is how.

It is obvious that the genocide accusation is political slander without any proof, but that reflects the tone of the Biden administra­tion’s hardline strategy on China over Xinjiang affairs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China