Global Times

Toxic decision

▶ China’s top nuclear scientist lambasts dumping radioactiv­e wastewater, proposes safer alternativ­es

- By Hu Yuwei Page Editor: liqiao@ globaltime­s. com. cn

As public trust rust in the Japanese panese government was shaken like the earthquake that hit Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant, China’s top nuclear scientist joined the chorus of criticism to express deep disappoint­ment over Japan’s recent decision to dump nuclear- contaminat­ed Fukushima wastewater into the ocean.

Zhou Yongmao, an academicia­n at the Chinese Academy of Engineerin­g, who spent over 60 years in nuclear engineerin­g starting with participat­ing in designing China’s first nuclear submarine in 1958, sounded his warning over the decision of Japan in an exclusive interview with the Global Times.

The expert called the decision very concerning and irresponsi­ble, as the massive amount of nuclear fission and radioactiv­e elements would affect both marine life and people.

Urging Japan to take alternativ­e solutions that are “clearly better treatments,” he said Japan chose “the worst and most harmful one among them all.”

He called for greater transparen­cy on specific disposal plans, and sample testing data to be published under the supervisio­n of the internatio­nal community if the discharge is unavoidabl­e.

Isotope concerns

To prevent the nuclear leakage in 2011 caused by the earthquake from getting worse, Japan’s Tokyo Electric Power Company ( TEPCO) chose to inject seawater into the

reactor react cores to cool the reactors. re

The contaminat­ed c water will likely lik fill up all the available tanks in the power plant by the summer of 2022, TEPCO said, which prompted the Japanese government to approve the decision of dumping the treated water, still containing radioactiv­e substances, into the ocean.

Though Japan said the isotope tritium, a radioactiv­e isotope of hydrogen, is not harmful to human health in small quantities, Zhou warned that the isotope can easily bind to other molecules, turning hazardous to the human metabolism and DNA, especially for infants, in the long run.

“In terms of toxicity, tritium oxide, that is, tritium dispersed in seawater is the most dangerous. It can enter the body through inhalation and damaged skin. If someone with a skin wound comes into contact with it, it may increase the risk of developing cancer later on,” Zhou told the Global Times.

Current scientific research shows that tritium oxide is generally indistingu­ishable from normal water and can move rapidly through the environmen­t in the same way as water.

In general wastewater treatment in the nuclear industry, exposure to all radioactiv­e materials requires frontline staff to wear a full set of sealed protective clothing due to its dangers. And since it is unknown just how harmful each of these chemicals will be in the long run, Japan was too quick to declare them harmless, Zhou argued.

He also lambasted the Japanese government’s indescriba­ble and confusing move to use a tritium mascot to advertise the

“safety” of radioactiv­e wastewater and described it as “very immoral and seriously misleading.”

Once they are exposed to the air, the level of pollution is unimaginab­le. Some of these elements remain active for as long as 10 million years, which can have dire consequenc­es for future generation­s, he noted.

Cheapest option

Prior to making the decision, reports said TEPCO had studied several versions of the nuclear wastewater treatment plan, such as building additional storage tanks and capacity, relocating tanks, going undergroun­d after solidifica­tion, dumping it into the sea after treatment, and evaporatin­g the water; however, it ended up with the cheapest plan which the Japanese government described as the “best option.”

TEPCO claimed that after treatment, the radiation levels of wastewater to be dumped into the Pacific Ocean will be lower than that of drinking water.

“However, who will supervise and monitor its implementa­tion? How can anyone ensure that the concentrat­ion of hazardous substances in each unit is within the acceptable range? Who will pay for the huge human and technical costs? Especially, the tracking time span that can be as long as 20 years,” Zhou questioned.

Zhou believes that leaving the wastewater going deep undergroun­d after solidifica­tion is a relatively better option for safety and health concerns, though with higher costs.

“But the Japanese government clearly does not want to pay the bill, preferring to push the risk on to others,” Zhou said.

Some of these elements remain active for as long as 10 million years, which can have dire consequenc­es for future generation­s.

 ??  ??
 ?? Photo: Courtesy of Zhou Yongmao ?? Zhou Yongmao, nuclear engineerin­g academicia­n at the Chinese Academy of Engineerin­g
Photo: Courtesy of Zhou Yongmao Zhou Yongmao, nuclear engineerin­g academicia­n at the Chinese Academy of Engineerin­g
 ?? Photo: Xinhua ?? Tanks at the crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant store nuclearcon­taminated wastewater.
Photo: Xinhua Tanks at the crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant store nuclearcon­taminated wastewater.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China