Global Times

UK’s black, Asian troops not commemorat­ed: report

-

As many as 350,000 black and Asian service personnel who died fighting for Britain might not have been properly commemorat­ed because of “pervasive racism,” a report concluded on Thursday.

The Commonweal­th War Graves Commission ( CWGC) issued an apology after an inquiry it commission­ed found hundreds of thousands of mostly African and Middle Eastern casualties from World War I were not commemorat­ed by name, or at all. “The events of a century ago were wrong then and are wrong now,” Claire Horton, director general of the CWGC, said. “We recognize the wrongs of the past and are deeply sorry and will be acting immediatel­y to correct them.”

The CWGC works to commemorat­e those from Commonweal­th forc

es who were killed in the two world wars and to ensure all those killed were remembered in the same way, with their name engraved either on a headstone over an identified grave or on a memorial to the missing.

But its inquiry found that between 45,000 and 54,000 casualties, predominan­tly Indian, Egyptian, Somali and from East and West Africa, were commemorat­ed “unequally.”

“A further 116,000 casualties [ predominan­tly, but not exclusivel­y, East African and Egyptian personnel] but potentiall­y as many as 350,000, were not commemorat­ed by name or possibly not commemorat­ed at all,” the report said.

The CWGC commission­ed the report in December 2019 after a television documentar­y found it had not treated Africans killed in World War I equally. The investigat­ion found examples of a British governor saying “the average native of the Gold Coast would not understand or appreciate a headstone.”

Another officer, who later worked for the CWGC’s predecesso­r the Imperial War Graves Commission, wrote “most of the natives who died are of a semi- savage nature,” so erecting headstones would be a waste of public money.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China