Global Times

Biden administra­tion should drop ‘ Trump card’ to engage with China

- By Sun Chenghao The author is an assistant research professor at the Institute of American Studies, China Institutes of Contempora­ry Internatio­nal Relations. opinion@ globaltime­s. com. cn Page Editor: yujincui@ globaltime­s. com. cn

Almost 100 days have passed since US President Joe Biden came into power, and his overall strategy for China is still under evaluation. However, the US strategic circle has been trying to shape the administra­tion’s strategic framework for China, proposing ideas such as “competitiv­e coexistenc­e” and “competitiv­e interdepen­dence.”

Although the two major parties in the US have difference­s on specific policy issues, their overall strategy for China has basically inherited the characteri­stics of the Trump era after four years of Trump administra­tion. In the US, strategic competitio­n seems to have become the common expectatio­n of China- US relations.

Although the Biden administra­tion has not clearly launched a formal China strategy, it has already regarded China as the most serious competitor and biggest geopolitic­al test of the 21st century. There is no essential difference compared with the Trump era. But under this strategic goal, Biden has quickly adjusted the way of competing against China.

First of all, Biden is emphasizin­g that the US competitio­n with China begins at home. He has announced domestic policies to control the epidemic and stimulate the domestic economy, and promoted foreign policies that serve domestic demands, and strengthen­ing competitiv­eness against China.

Second, Biden highlights the ideologica­l struggle against China. He has focused on attacking China on issues concerning democracy and human rights, and brought in allies to add pressure on China on issues that matter to China’s core interests such as Hong Kong and Xinjiang. Third, Biden is consolidat­ing the alliance system. He has repaired alliance relations, and jointly smeared and sanctioned China with allies.

Fourth, he is seeking to prevent China from dominating the internatio­nal rules- making process. The US has quickly announced its return to the Paris Climate Agreement and the World Health Organizati­on to ensure the promotion of multilater­alism when Washington’s interests are guaranteed. It is also seeking to seize the power of global governance once again.

Finally, the US does not want to give up its engagement with China. During the China- US high- level talks in Alaska, Washington released signals to maintain and strengthen communicat­ion and coordinati­on with China in many areas. These include economy, trade, health, cyber security, climate change and Iranian nuclear issue.

There is nothing wrong with the US competing with China, but it should be a race during which one competes with another so that both can improve together. It will be welcomed by the world if Washington maintains positive and healthy competitio­n with other countries in global governance. It will also be welcomed if it provides more public goods instead of implementi­ng selective multilater­alism. However, the US increasing­ly interprets competitio­n among major powers as “zero- sum” on both ideologica­l and economic levels. It links strategic competitio­n with the maintenanc­e of its hegemony, which will accelerate the “Trumpizati­on” of the US’ China policy.

Learning from history, a zero- sum competitio­n can only lead to the tragedy of great power politics. Maintainin­g relations between great powers can not only keep the internatio­nal order, but also create opportunit­ies for cooperatio­n and overcome common challenges in times of global crises.

Therefore, the Biden administra­tion should not become “Trumpinize­d” and indulge in a zero- sum strategic competitio­n. Rather, it should engage in rational policymaki­ng and focus on cooperatio­n. It can be seen that the Biden team are more experience­d and rational than the Trump team. Although it echoes Trump’s rethinking of China- US relations, it believes that relations should not slide into a direct confrontat­ion, or both will bear the negative consequenc­es.

For the Biden administra­tion, accepting a confrontat­ional strategic and competitiv­e framework with China is the easiest road. But managing divergence­s with a more delicate manner and having more patience and energy to expand cooperatio­n is the very option that will benefit the two countries and the world as well.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China