Global Times

Biden mishandles ‘wandering balloon’ episode

- By Shen Yi The author is director of the Research Institutio­n for Global Cyberspace Governance at Fudan University. opinion@ globaltime­s.com.cn

A“wandering balloon” – an utterly harmless civilian airship used for meteorolog­ical research, blown by wind and accidental­ly entered into US airspace via Westerlies – has made the US, a superpower which shows off its military muscles around the world, react as if it were confronted by a formidable enemy.

Members of Congress shrieked about the so-called threats to US national security, as if Doomsday was approachin­g. Amid the screams, the balloon turned into a target of a US F-22 fighter jet’s “first kill.” The act of rudely damaging Chinese civilian property quickly drew criticism from Chinese Foreign Ministry and Chinese Ministry of National Defense.

However, in the US, the political farce surroundin­g the wandering balloon is continuing, which helps us comprehens­ively understand the main challenge confrontin­g China-US ties, as well as the ill nature of US domestic politics.

Compared with the frank, open and calm manner of the Chinese authoritie­s, the performanc­es of some US politician­s in the current Biden administra­tion can be said as hysterical.

According to a statement of US Department of Defense issued on Saturday US time, “the balloon did not pose a military or physical threat… Chinese balloons briefly transited the continenta­l United States at least three times during the prior administra­tion.”

The US is the world’s largest military superpower. In December 2022, US President Joe Biden approved a record $858 billion defense spending bill for 2023. The figure not only ranks the first on global scale, but is also more than the military expenditur­e of the next nine countries combined. Yet the superpower somehow freaks out about a wandering balloon, which exposes it as a paper tiger.

From the perspectiv­e of modern military technology, balloons have long been logged off from mainstream military toolkits. The use of balloons, especially the type involved in the latest incident, which can be sent to the Earth’s stratosphe­re, is for collecting meteorolog­ical informatio­n.

Yet Politico magazine made a “serious” analysis, claiming they are “cheap, can carry a lot, and can hang out for a long time” for “surveillan­ce missions.” To put it bluntly, this is deliberate­ly pretending to be anxious. If such balloons were as efficient as surveillan­ce equipment, they would have appeared in the Pentagon’s purchase list long ago. Anyone who understand­s this technology knows that US satellite surveillan­ce system, as well as regular close-in reconnaiss­ance toward China, are the ones that can be described as aggressive and amok.

Seeing how the incident was hyped up in the US, people can clearly see that US domestic political struggles are compressin­g the room for Washington to make responsibl­e decisions for crisis management and strategies for stability.

In light of the historical developmen­t of the strategic games of great powers after World War II, crisis management and strategic stability require effective communicat­ion and exchanges among major countries on emergencie­s based on facts and seeking truth from facts.

In the practice of China-US relations, the US has been talking about crisis management all the time, with various terms and concepts, including “setting guardrails.” Now, when the west wind blows over a balloon, time has arrived to show US’ rational, prudent, profession­al and responsibl­e attitude. But how it turned out? Political figures in Washington are jumping up and down, yelling and screaming, seizing the opportunit­y to show their toughness and firmness, without the decency or grace they are supposed to have, and they have made China-US ties the victim of political infighting among different factions, when they are hitting and biting one another. They are extremely irresponsi­ble.

Another manifestat­ion of such irresponsi­bility is displayed by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s reportedly planned visit to China. It is supposed to be a follow-up of the China-US summit in Bali, Indonesia, in November 2022. But the US side seems to have mistakenly believed that Blinken’s Beijing trip is some kind of gift from the US to China, and the US side can make it work if it likes, and can cancel the trip if it doesn’t.

As Chinese Foreign Ministry points out, “One of the tasks of the diplomatic teams on both sides is to properly manage bilateral relations, particular­ly to manage some unexpected situations in a cool-headed and prudent manner. In fact, neither side has ever announced that there would be a visit. It is a matter for the US to make its latest announceme­nt, and we respect that.”

That being said, be it the narrative that Blinken was planning to visit China, or the reports that the trip was postponed, they are all monologues from the US, which are not in line with either diplomatic management or the rules-based laws that the US has been talking a lot, or the consensus reached by the two sides after consultati­on. The one-man show of the US will do no good to help China-US relations back to the sound track as soon as possible.

The wandering balloon episode echoes an old Chinese saying – life can be really simple, but some insist on making it complicate­d. The reaction from the US is bringing troubles on oneself. It is hoped the US diplomatic team can amend its improper approach, break away from the shackles of American political infighting, manage bilateral ties in a truly responsibl­e manner, meet the Chinese side half way, and calmly and prudently deal with emergencie­s and accidents. That is crucial to both the China-US ties and the world.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China