Study notes hurdles to supersonic air travel

REVIVING supersonic passenger flights will harm the environment as the jets will not likely be able to comply with existing fuel efficiency, pollution and noise standards for subsonic aircraft, according to a study released yesterday.

US based startups Aerion Supersonic, Boom Supersonic and Spike Aerospace are all aiming to revive ultra-fast flights by the mid-2020s by modifying existing engines rather than spending billions of dollars to make a new one to serve a market that has been dormant since the Concorde stopped flying in 2003.

Modified engines will burn five-to-seven times more fuel per passenger than subsonic jets, exceed global limits for new subsonic jets by 40 percent for nitrogen oxide and 70 percent for carbon dioxide, the International Council on Clean Transportation said.

The ICCT said, based on its study, supersonic jet makers would be unlikely to meet environmental standards unless they used a new engine design with technology like a variable cycle that would operate differently at takeoff than in cruise mode.

The alternative is for policymakers to ease standards for supersonic jets, the ICCT adds.

The US is already pushing for different standards for ultra-fast planes but facing resistance from European nations that want tough rules on noise.

“There are reasons to be worried about the environmental impact of reintroducing supersonic aircraft,” said Daniel Rutherford, aviation director at the US-based independent non-profit research organization.

Supersonic jets are most efficient at cruising altitude with smaller engines that are far noisier on takeoff. Smaller engines help reduce aerodynamic drag when flying above the speed of sound.