South China Morning Post

Henri-Georges Clouzot’s Inferno

The stylish documentar­y recounts the doomed 1964 film, the production of which ended three weeks after it began, its out-of-his-depth director having suffered a heart attack.

- Romy Schneider in a still from Henri-Georges Clouzot’s Inferno.

Films sometimes fall to pieces during production, and HenriGeorg­es Clouzot’s Inferno (aka L’enfer d’HenriGeorg­es Clouzot) details just such a derailment, telling the story of how the director’s pet project, Inferno

(or L’enfer, which literally translates as “hell”) ground to a halt after a few weeks of shooting, in 1964.

It’s an accomplish­ed, stylish documentar­y that makes use of the original Inferno footage, supplement­ing it with staged readings by actors. The crew talk about the events leading up to the film’s failure as if they occurred yesterday.

Clouzot, who died in 1977, was a critically acclaimed director, best known internatio­nally for directing the Hitchcockl­ike psychologi­cal thriller Les Diabolique­s in 1955. He had been criticised by the French New Wave when they rose to prominence in the late 1950s, accusing him of being hidebound and oldfashion­ed.

Inferno was intended to mark Clouzot’s return to the scene with something strikingly modern. The story, which was mainly filmed on and around a big lake, is about a psychotica­lly jealous man driven mad because he thinks his provocativ­e wife is having a series of affairs.

Clouzot looked to the art world to give the film a contempora­ry look, drawing on OpArt – which capitalise­s on the eye’s potential to create optical illusions – for the specialeff­ects sequences used to express the madness of his protagonis­t. The footage of these scenes looks highly sophistica­ted considerin­g there were no computeris­ed effects available – although they led to some of the film’s many problems, as Clouzot did not understand the technical process and argued with his technician­s.

Other scenes use bright colours and lighting effects to show the characters’ distorted point of view, referencin­g the psychedeli­c wave that was taking shape in popular culture.

Films often fail due to lack of funding but that was not the case with Inferno; the film’s backers were so impressed with Clouzot’s pitch, they had taken the unusual step of giving him an unlimited budget. Interviewe­es conclude that the problems were entirely of Clouzot’s making, noting that he often seemed at a loss about what to do, and would stand beside the camera staring blankly into space rather than making directoria­l decisions.

The biggest problem was that Clouzot – who was known for his nasty treatment of actors and actresses – harassed Serge

Reggiani so much that the leading man walked out of the film, saying that he would rather risk a lawsuit than continue to be insulted by Clouzot. Continuing without a leading man, Clouzot had a heart attack three weeks into the shoot, and the insurance companies pulled the plug on the film.

The script of Inferno did finally see the light of day in a 1994 adaptation by Claude Chabrol, L’enfer. Chabrol’s disturbing version is everything that Clouzot could have wished for.

HenriGeorg­es Clouzot’s Inferno will be screened on Saturday at Broadway Cinematheq­ue, in Yau Ma Tei, as part of the Hong Kong French Film Festival.

 ?? ?? Henri-Georges Clouzot and Schneider in a still from the documentar­y.
Henri-Georges Clouzot and Schneider in a still from the documentar­y.
 ?? ?? ART HOUSE | RICHARD JAMES HAVIS
ART HOUSE | RICHARD JAMES HAVIS

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China