South China Morning Post

COMPENSATI­ON TO RISE FOR LAND SURRENDERS

New mechanism offers simpler two tiers of payment, with amounts to be determined by resumption purpose and rates reviewed every six months

- Joyce Ng joyce.ng@scmp.com

Compensati­on rates for rural landlords who surrender their plots to the government will be raised starting this month under a simplified mechanism, which officials say will help speed up developmen­t of the Northern Metropolis.

The revised arrangemen­t will increase by 10 per cent the government budget for land resumption in the next five years in the New Territorie­s, which involves 500 hectares of private land and costs HK$6.3 billion.

A spokeswoma­n for the Developmen­t Bureau yesterday said the measures were to address long-standing complaints from landowners about unfairness in the so-called ex gratia compensati­on system, used by the government to seize private agricultur­al land for building public housing, infrastruc­ture, community facilities, conservati­on and so on.

“In future, when we pay, we will be just looking at the purpose of land resumption – whether your land is taken for developmen­t or not. There will be only two kinds of rates,” she said.

The current system has four tiers where compensati­on is determined by location rather than purpose, with owners of plots located within planned new towns getting the highest rate, followed by those whose plots are situated nearby.

“A typical complaint from landowners is, ‘why do I get a lower rate just because my plot is right outside the new town across the road, while another person on the opposite side of the road who happens to fall within the new town gets more?’ Both are surrenderi­ng their land to build public housing after all,” the spokeswoma­n said.

There was also dissatisfa­ction about less compensati­on for those making way for the constructi­on of railways, columbaria and sewage treatment, although such facilities were of equal social importance as public housing, she added.

Under the new mechanism, which took effect from yesterday, all agricultur­al land to be taken for developmen­t purposes, regardless of location, will be covered by a “Tier 1” rate of HK$1,510 per square foot.

Other land that will be resumed for conservati­on or rural improvemen­t will fall under the “Tier 2” rate of HK$755 per square foot, or half the Tier 1 rate. The rates are subject to review every six months.

Among the beneficiar­ies will be owners of sites outside new towns which will be taken to build 120,000 public housing flats.

The bureau expects to resume 500 hectares of private land from this financial year to 2026-27, and 200 hectares more beyond that. About 90 per cent of the land will be taken to develop the Northern Metropolis, which will be an expansion of existing new towns with an informatio­n technology hub near the border with the mainland, housing 2.5 million people.

Officials expect the new framework will help clear resistance to land resumption, especially for the Northern Metropolis, and in turn speed up the project.

The Tier 2 rate will be invoked to seize wetland owned by major developers near the Deep Bay Area for permanent conservati­on, as part of the metropolis scheme.

Compensati­on for residents living in squatter structures on rural land had been enhanced in 2018, with more cash or a new option to move to public rental housing.

Leung Fuk-yuen, a landowner and a former chairman of Shap Pat Heung Rural Committee, said the new mechanism was an improvemen­t because the past formula was random and unfair.

Ryan Ip, head of land and housing research at Our Hong Kong Foundation, a local think tank, said the policy was to “trade cash for time” and would help contribute to the timely delivery of the housing programme.

In future, when we pay, we will be just looking at the purpose of land resumption

DEVELOPMEN­T BUREAU SPOKESWOMA­N

 ?? Photo: May Tse ?? Landowners have frequently complained about unfairness in the current system used to determine the value of resumed land.
Photo: May Tse Landowners have frequently complained about unfairness in the current system used to determine the value of resumed land.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China