South China Morning Post

Action promised against India amid feud over visas for journalist­s

- Cyril Ip cyril.ip@scmp.com

Beijing yesterday said it would take appropriat­e countermea­sures against India’s “unfair and discrimina­tory treatment” of Chinese journalist­s, but called for practical action so that normal media exchanges could resume.

This comes after The Wall Street Journal on Tuesday reported that the neighbouri­ng countries had kicked out nearly all of each other’s journalist­s.

The report said the last two Chinese journalist­s in India – from state news agency Xinhua and state broadcaste­r CCTV – had been denied visa renewals.

Beijing’s foreign ministry confirmed yesterday that two reporters in India had not been granted visa extensions.

According to the newspaper, there are no longer any Chinese state media reporters in India – likely for the first time since at least the 1980s.

The report also said that of the four China-based Indian journalist­s, two were not granted visas to return to China, and one was told this month that his accreditat­ion had been revoked but he could remain in the country.

“What I can tell you is that for a long time Chinese media reporters have suffered unfair and discrimina­tory treatment in India,” foreign ministry spokeswoma­n Mao Ning said when asked about the expulsions.

According to Mao, India had in 2017 “without reason” shortened the validity period of Chinese journalist­s’ visas to between one and three months. She said that in 2020, New Delhi had also refused to approve applicatio­ns for Chinese reporters to be permanentl­y based in the country.

“What’s more, in December 2021, a China Media Group reporter in India – with their visa still valid for two months and their employment still active for half a year – was required to leave the country within 10 days,” said Mao, adding that New Delhi had yet to provide an explanatio­n for that case.

“Faced with this long-term unreasonab­le suppressio­n by the Indian side, China has no choice but to take appropriat­e countermea­sures to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese media.”

She did not say how many Indian reporters remained in China. But in April – when reporters for The Hindu newspaper and state broadcaste­r Prasar Bharati were barred from returning – Mao said two other Indian outlets still had journalist­s in the country.

She said Beijing was willing to maintain communicat­ion with New Delhi “based on the principles of mutual respect, equality and mutual benefit”.

“We also hope that the Indian side can meet us halfway, seriously respond to our legitimate concerns, and take practical action as soon as possible to create favourable conditions for the resumption of normal media exchanges between the two countries.”

On Tuesday, Liu Jinsong, head of the foreign ministry’s Asian affairs department, met three visiting Indian journalist­s. Liu told them that as emerging developing countries, China and India should work together to settle their difference­s, cooperate and achieve mutual success, according to a statement from the department.

What I can tell you is that for a long time, Chinese media reporters have suffered unfair and discrimina­tory treatment in India

MAO NING, FOREIGN MINISTRY

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China