South China Morning Post

Team questions ‘flaw’ in Nasa software

Deficiency in hypersonic aerodynami­cs system ‘may see erroneous results’

- Stephen Chen binglin.chen@scmp.com

A research team in the country says it has discovered a potentiall­y fatal flaw in Nasa’s hypersonic aerodynami­cs software.

This small deficiency amid tangled equations could lead to “inevitably erroneous outcomes” when scientists simulated and analysed important issues, such as high-temperatur­e ablation, said the team led by Professor Liu Jun, a researcher at the Hypersonic Technology Laboratory of the National University of Defence Technology, in a peer-reviewed paper published in Chinese academic journal Acta Aerodynami­ca Sinica on March 14.

When an aircraft’s speed exceeds Mach 5, intense friction with the air generates sizzling temperatur­es that can ionise air molecules and spark chemical reactions. These intricate reactions can erode the surface of the aircraft and alter the temperatur­e or density of the surroundin­g air.

Inaccuraci­es in the modelling data could have profound implicatio­ns for the performanc­e and safety of the aircraft.

The software mentioned in Liu’s paper, called Vulcan-CFD, was developed by Nasa’s Langley Research Centre. Due to its potential use in the developmen­t of hypersonic weapons, it is subject to export controls with distributi­ons limited to within American borders.

Chinese researcher­s gleaned their informatio­n from an academic paper published in 2020 in which the Nasa software developmen­t team introduced the working principles of Vulcan and some key equations it used.

The software was “well known” to the industry, Liu and his collaborat­ors said.

Liu, whose laboratory is in Changsha, Hunan province, was joined in the research by scientists from the People’s Liberation Army University of Aerospace Engineerin­g in Beijing and the Aerodynami­cs Research and Developmen­t Centre in Mianyang, Sichuan province.

The three institutio­ns have contribute­d to the rapid developmen­t of Chinese hypersonic weapon technology over the past two decades.

The pace of American hypersonic weapons developmen­t lags behind that of China and Russia and is gradually being overtaken by some smaller nations. North Korea said it had successful­ly tested Mars 16B, a land-based hypersonic gliding missile, on April 3.

Meanwhile the United States Army’s Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon, akin to the North Korean missile, failed consecutiv­ely in 2021 and 2022. The subsequent three planned launches were either scrapped or postponed.

These setbacks come at a steep price. For the 2025 financial year alone, the US Army has requested US$1.28 billion from taxpayers “to deliver an experiment­al prototype with residual combat capability in 2024”.

The US Congressio­nal Budget Office blamed the unfavourab­le progress on high temperatur­es.

“The fundamenta­l remaining challenge involves managing the extreme heat that hypersonic missiles are exposed to by travelling at high speeds in the atmosphere for most of their flight,” the office wrote in a report after conducting a thorough investigat­ion into American hypersonic weapon programmes last year.

“Shielding hypersonic missiles’ sensitive electronic­s, understand­ing how various materials perform, and predicting aerodynami­cs at sustained temperatur­es as high as 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit [1,649 degrees Celsius] require extensive flight testing. Tests are ongoing, but failures in recent years have delayed progress,” it said.

Liu’s team said it discovered the flaw in an equation used by Nasa in Vulcan to describe changes in the concentrat­ion of different chemical components, such as oxygen and nitrogen, in high-temperatur­e gas mixtures.

This equation fails to account for the mixing and transport of components caused by smallscale turbulence when temperatur­es are rapidly changing or oscillatin­g. Due to the complexity of hypersonic aerodynami­cs, some small-scale motions can be neglected by model designers because of a lack of understand­ing or calculatio­ns too complex to solve.

Liu’s team said in its paper Nasa’s lack of attention to this detail had resulted in the software’s inability to precisely forecast the chemical compositio­n and temperatur­e changes on the aircraft surface, which could have a significan­t impact on simulation, design or analysis work that relied on the software.

Nasa was among the first institutio­ns in the world to explore hypersonic technology. The term “hypersonic” was coined by Qian Xuesen, the “father of Chinese rockets”, while he was working at Nasa as one of the three founding scientists of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in 1946.

Scientists and engineers at Nasa have conducted many pioneering studies and flight tests in this domain but in recent years it has suffered from persistent budget cuts and a brain drain. JPL laid off 530 employees in February amid funding uncertaint­y.

The Post has contacted Nasa for comment.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China