JOINT NAVY DRILLS AIMED AT N KOREA ‘UNNERVE BEIJING’
As Washington steps up cooperation with Japan and South Korea, analysts say the reaction will be that the three are trying to keep China in check
Washington’s military links with Seoul and Tokyo may be targeted mainly at North Korea but is also likely to unnerve China, adding impetus to the “transactional” relations between Beijing and Pyongyang, analysts say.
South Korea’s navy said it had conducted joint naval drills with the US and Japan in international waters south of Jeju Island to “improve joint operability against North Korea’s nuclear and missile threats”. The April 11-12 exercises involved the USS Theodore Roosevelt aircraft carrier, three Arleigh Burke-class guidedmissile destroyers and two Aegis destroyers from South Korea and Japan.
“This training was conducted to implement a multi-year trilateral training plan jointly established by the defence authorities of [South] Korea, the United States and Japan in accordance with the Camp David Agreement last year,” the South Korean defence ministry said.
The South Korean navy said the forces focused on anti-submarine warfare training and on the ability to respond to North Korean underwater threats, such as submarines and submarine-launched ballistic missiles. They also carried out maritime interception training to block smuggling of weapons of mass destruction, as well as search and rescue training.
Washington has been strengthening military ties with Seoul and Tokyo since the Camp David summit in August, where leaders pledged to “regularise defensive exercises that contribute to strengthening trilateral responses” against North Korean threats. The recent drill followed naval exercises in January among the three.
“The trilateral naval exercises are geared to respond to North Korea threats, but Beijing is certainly watching as the three allies strengthen military cooperation,” said Andrew Yeo, a senior fellow and SK-Korea Foundation chair of Korea studies at the Brookings Institution in Washington.
Cho Han-bum, a senior research fellow at the Korea Institute for National Unification, said the waters – south of Jeju and north of Taiwan – had strategic significance for Beijing. “As a result, China may be concerned that these Korea-US-Japan security maritime exercises could affect China, especially on the Taiwan Strait issue. It is also an area where there may be concerns about the expansion of security countermeasures against Taiwan,” Cho said.
“From the US perspective, the southern part of Jeju serves as a check on North Korea, but also, due to its geopolitical characteristics, is an area that can also serve as a certain check on China.”
Yang Uk, a research fellow at the Asan Institute for Policy Studies in Seoul, said that while the exercises showed systemic cooperation between South Korea and the US in responding to North Korean threats, they would also be “inconvenient” for China. “Basically, the response against China had been carried out through cooperation between the US and Japan,” he said. “But now, South Korea’s participation in the US-Japan joint training is ultimately leading China to view the trilateral ties as targeting itself.”
Yang said the East China Sea area south of Jeju Island was a “strategic point” for China as its navy must pass near the island and the Japanese archipelago to go towards the Pacific Ocean.
Kang Jun-young, a professor of Chinese studies at Hankuk University of Foreign Studies in Seoul, said there could be a “difference in perception” between Seoul and Beijing about the drills, resulting in more friction. The drill took place as China’s No 3 official, Zhao Leji, was on a visit to Pyongyang to mark 75 years of bilateral ties.
At the same time, North Korea has been strengthening ties with Russia. There are suspicions that Pyongyang exchanged weapons with Moscow to support Russia’s war in Ukraine.
“[Zhao’s visit] has the double effect of further strengthening relations with North Korea, thereby keeping North KoreaRussia relations in check, and, on the other hand, China is now showing a kind of warning about South Korea-US joint exercises or South Korea-US-Japan trilateral training,” Kang said.
However, Beijing’s strengthened ties with Pyongyang would continue to be “transactional”, according to Yeo.
“Beijing has an incentive to support Pyongyang on the international stage as the US strengthens ties with its allies,” Yeo said. “But China-North Korea relations will have greater constraints and look more transactional given North Korea’s pariah status and lack of transparency.”
Yang said Beijing’s attitude to Pyongyang had been a “very clever approach”, focusing on political and diplomatic cooperation to contain Washington’s trilateral cooperation without risking military consequences.
“Right now, China has nothing to gain by overtly engaging with North Korea militarily, and in particular, it could appear to be supporting North Korea’s nuclear development,” Yang said.
“But politically, of course, the relationship between the two sides has been long, and especially now, it can have some meaning in responding to trilateral cooperation between Korea, the US and Japan.”