Israel ‘taking over’ Palestine economy as conflict rages
West Bank officials are denied tax revenue while livelihoods have been badly hit, analysts say
The Gaza war is speeding up Israel’s “annexation” of the Palestinian economy, say analysts, who argue it has been hobbled for decades by agreements that followed the Oslo peace accords.
While the Israel-Gaza war, raging since October 7, has devastated swathes of Gaza, it has also hit the public finances and wider economy of the Israeli-occupied West Bank.
Israel was tightening the noose on the Palestinian Authority, which rules parts of the West Bank, by withholding tax revenues it collected on its behalf, economist Adel Samara said.
Palestinian livelihoods have also been hurt by bans on labourers crossing into Israel, and by a sharp downturn in tourism in the violence-plagued territory, including a quiet Christmas season in Bethlehem.
Samara said that “technically speaking, there was no Palestinian economy under Israeli occupation – our economy has been effectively annexed by Israel’s”.
The Palestinian economy is largely governed by the 1994 Paris Protocol, which granted sole control over the territories’ borders to Israel, and with it the right to collect import duties and valueadded tax for the Palestinian Authority.
Israel has repeatedly leveraged this power to deprive the authority of much-needed revenues.
But the Gaza war had further tightened Israel’s grip, Samara said, with the bulk of customs duties withheld since Gaza’s rulers Hamas sparked the war with their October 7 attack on Israel.
“Without these funds, the Palestinian Authority struggles to pay the salaries of its civil servants and its running costs,” said Taher al-Labadi, a researcher at the French Institute for the Near East.
In February, Norway reportedly transferred to the Palestinian Authority about US$115 million from Israel following a deal to release some of the frozen taxes.
Almost all Palestinian workers have also been forbidden from entering Israel for work, driving up unemployment across the territories.
The Palestinian prime minister, Mohammad Mustafa, bemoaned an “unprecedented financial crisis” during which his government’s deficit had soared to US$7 billion, more than onethird of the territories’ gross domestic product, according to the latest budgetary figures.
The Paris Protocol, like the 1993 and 1995 Oslo agreements, was meant to last for five years, until the creation of a Palestinian state. But the absence of a longterm peace deal means it is still governing nearly all aspects of the Palestinian economy.
Investment was also being stifled by the protocol, said Samara, who explained that Israel “controls the land, resources and water sources” of the Palestinian territories.
Before any factory or shop requiring access to these resources can be built in the West Bank, Israel must grant authorisation, he said.
Israel’s stance had become even tougher under far-right Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, he said, both of whom were settlers in the West Bank.
Critics accuse them of holding Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to ransom by threatening to withdraw the support that gives him a wafer-thin governing majority.
Israeli political analyst Michael Milshtein echoed his take.
“By not allowing Palestinian workers into Israel and withholding Palestinian tax revenues, Ben Gvir and Smotrich aim to overthrow the Palestinian Authority because they view it as an enemy,” he said. “It’s a way to collectively punish Palestinians, whom they also see as enemies.”
Milshtein said that before October 7, nearly one-third of West Bank income came from the earnings of the 193,000 Palestinians who worked in Israel, according to Israeli figures.
Today, the number of Palestinians working in Israel had dropped to between 8,000 and 9,000, he said.
But Milshtein also pointed to another strain of Israeli opinion, held by centrist minister Benny Gantz and conservative lawmaker Gideon Saar.
They want to allow workers back into Israel to avoid anger sparking an uprising in the West Bank, at a time when Israeli forces are already stretched between Gaza and the Lebanese border, where they are trading fire with Iran-backed Hezbollah.
Milshtein said he believed Netanyahu was probably closer to the Gantz view.
Nasr Abdel Kareem, an economics professor at the Arab American University in the West Bank, argued that the Israeli prime minister was playing a power game.
“Netanyahu is putting pressure on the Palestinians and signalling to the authority that the levers of the Palestinian economy are in [Israel’s] hands,” he said.
“Netanyahu believes that he will weaken the authority and make it accept political concessions” when a peace agreement eventually had to be hammered out, he said.
This strategy could be misguided, said Nasr, because it was based on the premise that letting the Palestinian economy flourish would automatically bring peace to the West Bank.
“Historically, previous uprisings broke out” when times were not tough economically, he said, adding that ultimately Palestinians wanted a state as much as a healthy economy.