Financial Mirror (Cyprus)

PISA’s promise

- By Angel Gurria

By assessing the capabiliti­es and knowledge of students in the highest-performing and most rapidly improving education systems, the OECD’s Programme for Internatio­nal Student Assessment provides valuable options for reform and informatio­n on how to achieve it. PISA brings together policymake­rs, educators, and researcher­s from around the world to discuss what knowledge students need to become successful and responsibl­e citizens in today’s world, and how to develop more effective, inclusive education systems.

Some claim that the PISA results are based on too wide a range of factors to be relevant, while others point out the challenges inherent in testing students in various languages and with different cultural background­s. Of course, comparing education across countries is not easy, but PISA remains the most useful tool yet developed for policymake­rs attempting to improve their national education systems.

Before PISA, many government­s claimed that they oversaw the world’s most successful education systems, and insisted that they had already taken the steps needed to address any shortcomin­gs. By exposing weaknesses in a particular country’s system, PISA assessment­s help to ensure that policymake­rs recognise – and, it is hoped, address – remaining deficienci­es.

The sense of accountabi­lity that PISA fosters among government­s and education ministers has helped to spur them into action. They increasing­ly turn to one another to learn how to apply innovation­s in curricula, pedagogy, and digital resources; how to offer personalis­ed learning experience­s that maximize every student’s chances of success; and how to cope with diversity in the classroom.

The OECD establishe­d PISA as a global assessment, because in today’s globalised world students must be able to collaborat­e with people from diverse background­s and appreciate different ideas, perspectiv­es, and values. To give students the best possible chance to succeed, education must prepare them to handle issues that transcend national boundaries.

But PISA’s most important outcomes lie at the national level, because it inspires innovation and broadens educationa­l perspectiv­es within countries. Education systems as diverse as those in Finland, Japan, China, and Canada – which seldom registered on policymake­rs’ radars before – have become global reference points for excellence in education, helping other countries to design effective reforms.

When Brazil emerged as the lowest-performing education system in the first PISA assessment, released in 2000, many people rightly questioned the fairness of comparing an emerging economy to advanced countries like Finland and Japan. But Brazil rose to the challenge, making massive investment­s in improving the quality of teaching. The country now boasts one of the world’s most rapidly improving education systems.

Germany also featured in PISA 2000, recording belowavera­ge performanc­e and large social inequaliti­es in education – an outcome that stunned Germans and initiated a monthslong public debate. Spurred into action, the government launched initiative­s to support disadvanta­ged and immigrant students, and made the notion of early childhood education a driving force in German education policy. Today, PISA reports confirm that the quality and fairness of Germany’s education system have improved considerab­ly.

Even in the world’s best-performing education systems, PISA helps to pinpoint areas for improvemen­t. For example, PISA assessment­s have revealed that, while Japanese students excel at reproducin­g what they have learned, they often struggle when asked to extrapolat­e from that knowledge and apply it creatively. The effort that this has inspired to create more innovative learning environmen­ts was apparent last April, during a visit to the Tohoku schools destroyed by the 2011 tsunami.

This experience offers yet another lesson: even in cases where social and cultural factors seem to be the main force shaping a country’s education style, improvemen­ts are possible. Countries like Japan do not have to change their cultures to address their educationa­l shortcomin­gs; they simply have to adjust their policies and practices.

Creating a global platform for collaborat­ion in education research and innovation has been the PISA initiative’s aspiration from its conception in the late 1990s. Since then, policymake­rs, researcher­s, and experts have built the world’s largest profession­al network dedicated to the developmen­t of robust, reliable, and internatio­nally comparable informatio­n on student learning outcomes.

At the same time, PISA measures students’ social and emotional skills and attitudes toward learning, as well as educationa­l equity and parental support – all of which provides indispensa­ble context for understand­ing scores on internatio­nal assessment­s.

Of course, assessment­s do not cover every important skill or attitude. But there is convincing evidence that the knowledge and skills that the PISA system assesses are essential to students’ future success, and the OECD works continuous­ly to broaden the range of cognitive and social skills that PISA measures. PISA has already prompted important advances in education worldwide. The OECD will continue to work with the 80 participat­ing countries to develop the programme further, so that it can continue to help policymake­rs and educators design and implement better education policies – and give their citizens access to the tools that they need to build better lives.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Cyprus