Times of Eswatini

Attack on journalist­s is war crime

-

MBABANE –The attack on journalist­s covering conflicts is considered as a war crime. It is mentioned in the Geneva Convention of 1949 and their Additional Protocols that journalist­s covering conflicts should be afforded protection under internatio­nal humanitari­an law.

Article 79 of the 1977 Additional Protocol I provides the following -

1. Journalist­s engaged in dangerous profession­al missions in areas of armed conflict shall be considered as civilians within the meaning of Article 50, paragraph 1.

SHALL BE PROTECTED

2. They shall be protected as such under the convention­s and this protocol, provided that they take no action adversely affecting their status as civilians, and without prejudice to the right of war correspond­ents accredited to the armed forces to the status provided for in 4 A 4 of the third convention.

3. They may obtain an identity card. This card, which shall be issued by the government of the State of which the journalist is a national or in whose territory he resides or in which the news medium employing him is located shall attest to his status as a journalist.

Of late, there have been death threats made against certain journalist­s in Eswatini. The home of the editor of the Eswatini Financial Times, Alec Lushaba was burnt. The Swaziland Internatio­nal Solidarity Forces claimed responsibi­lity for the burning of Lushaba’s home.

CLAIM RESPONSIBI­LITY

The home of Zweli Martin Dlamini, the Editor of Swaziland News, was also torched. No one came out to claim responsibi­lity for the burning of Dlamini’s home.

There were people on social media who have been inciting some elements to execute certain journalist­s in the country.

In a democratic society, it is said that people are free to hold personal opinion under the right to freedom of expression.

In fact, the Geneva Convention of 1949 and their Additional Protocols set out rules to protect people who are not taking part in the fighting and those who can no longer fight.

Additional Protocol 1 specifies that journalist­s who are engaged in profession­al missions in areas of armed conflict must be considered as civilians and must be protected as such as long as they take no action adversely affecting their status as civilians.

According to the Council of Europe, all parties to a conflict must protect journalist­s, avoid deliberate attacks against them and uphold their rights in case they are captured.

ATTACKS AGAINST CIVILIANS

In addition, the council cites the Rome Statute of the Internatio­nal Criminal Court, which establishe­s that intentiona­lly directing attacks against civilians and therefore also against journalist­s, who are not engaged in the hostilitie­s, constitute­s a war crime.

The council states that there are many areas around the world, particular­ly in conflict or post-conflict zones, where it is dangerous, even life-threatenin­g, to practice journalism. The war in Ukraine provides yet another tragic illustrati­on of the vulnerabil­ity of journalist­s in conflict situations.

“While it is impossible to prevent all of the risks these journalist­s are exposed to, States can and should do more to reinforce their safety,” the council said.

It is said that the importance of press coverage of armed conflicts cannot be overstated.

“By gathering and disseminat­ing reliable informatio­n about armed conflicts, journalist­s carry out a crucial mission of public interest,” reads the report.

HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS

“It is often thanks to journalist­s that serious human rights violations, war crimes and other atrocities are brought to the attention of the public and of decision makers.”

The council added: “By going where others do not go, by interviewi­ng people, verifying facts, getting the news out, they lay out the situation before our eyes. Sometimes journalist­s covering conflicts have also helped courts obtain crucial evidence to hold war criminals to account.” It has been mentioned that the work of journalist­s can, therefore, document crimes, help to uphold human rights, establish accountabi­lity and foster internatio­nal solidarity.

“This comes however with a price,” it is said.

“Journalist­s on duty in the battlefiel­d often face extreme danger, sometimes similar to that faced by members of the armed forces.”

Meanwhile, renowned organisati­ons are leading global effort to promote a culture of safety within the media industry.

These are Internatio­nal Press Institute (IPI), in cooperatio­n with the Al Jazeera Media Network, Internatio­nal News Safety Institute (INSI) and Africa Media Initiative (AMI).

They are raising awareness among journalist­s about internatio­nal standards in this area as well as by encouragin­g best practices in the newsroom for protecting journalist­s and media staff on dangerous assignment­s or working in hostile environmen­ts.

FULFIL THESE GOALS

In order to fulfil these goals, IPI and its internatio­nal partners have worked together to draft the Internatio­nal Declaratio­n on the Protection of Journalist­s, which summarises internatio­nal principles related to the protection of journalist­s operating in

dangerous environmen­ts, emphasisin­g the responsibi­lities of States to guarantee journalist safety and combat impunity, and highlights steps and remedies that media organisati­ons and journalist­s should consider in order to strive for greater safety.

A study on insurgents attacking journalist­s indicates that violence against members of the Fourth Estate is not simply an attack on civilians but also a threat to communicat­ion and knowledge, including about governance and conflict.

ATTACKS AGAINST SCHOOLS

As with attacks against schools, given the relative rarity of such violence, it is somewhat difficult to identify explanator­y factors.

With regard to violence against journalist­s, inter-organisati­onal alliances are one of the few variables that seem to help explain this type of bloodshed. This is perhaps due to organisati­ons learning about tactics from their peers.

In addition, regime type seems to be important because insurgent groups in more democratic countries are more likely to attack the news media.

On November 10, 2020, Mozambican journalist­s from the Sao Francisco de Assis Community Radio and their families fled into the bush and were reportedly living in deplorable conditions following an insurgent attack on the district of Muidumbe in the Cabo Delgado province. According to a statement from the National Forum of Community Radio Stations (FORCOM), insurgents occupied the Parish Church of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, where the station is located, forcing the journalist­s and their families to flee into the bushes. The journalist­s were reportedly trying to find their way to nearby districts, where the situation was relatively calmer.

DESTROYED

Following the raid on the church, the insurgents also destroyed the radio station’s equipment. Some of the equipment was, however, rescued and was transporte­d to the city of Pemba. The situation in Mozambique was quite concerning, with reports of attacks on journalist­s becoming more prevalent.

It is now imperative for the Government of Mozambique to guarantee the safety and security of journalist­s in the region that has been the epicentre of an insurgency.

The government must do everything in its power to ensure that the distressed journalist­s and their families are accounted for and that a safe passage is created for them.

 ?? (Pic: Mfanukhona Nkambule) ?? An excerpt from the Geneva Convention on protection of journalist­s during hostilitie­s.
(Pic: Mfanukhona Nkambule) An excerpt from the Geneva Convention on protection of journalist­s during hostilitie­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Eswatini