Global Protection Services awarded MTC tender
MBABANE- Global Protection Services has been enlisted as the best-evaluated tenderer to be awarded the Matsapha Town Council (MTC) security contract.
This was revealed by the (swati ni 3ublic 3rocurement 5egulatory $gency (6335$ on their website. The intention to award the compa ny was published on )riday, and they are e[pected to begin e[ecut ing it after a period of 10 worNing days, should it not be contested. $ccording to the regulator, 0T& was looNing for a company to provide security services for their property.
The proposed contract price was ( . per month. :orth noting, (6335$ and the gov ernment have collaborated to intro duce an electronic government pro curement system as well as a directory for suppliers both entities said this would be beneficial for businesses
NAME
1. Intelligence Security Services
2. Mercy Security Services
3. Delta Force Security Services
4. Top Two Security Services 5. Pitbull Security Protection 6. Fidelity Security Services
Tenders
NATIONALITY
Swazi
Swazi
Swazi
Swazi
Swazi
Swazi
and further promote efficiency. They also said they aimed at decreasing the number of procurement defaults and limiting the outsourcing of services.
BID PRICE AS READ OUT
E57 557.44
Did not obtain score to qualify for financial proposal evaluation
Did not obtain score to qualify for financial proposal evaluation
Did not obtain score to qualify for financial proposal evaluation
Did not obtain score to qualify for financial proposal evaluation
Did not obtain score to qualify for financial proposal evaluation
that transparency is Ney in the evalua tion of tenders in public procurement. 0eanwhile, (6335$ &(2 9u sumutiwendvod]a 0atsebula men tioned that unless these gaps and shortcomings were corrected, the public procurement system in (s watini would remain inefficient, thus
EVALUATED PRICE
E57 557.44
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
TOTAL EVALUATION SCORE
71% 65% 65% 56% 55% 47 %
causing mistrust between the govern ment and the general public.
+e said it was important to state that this milestone has been the result of a collaborative effort, support, and commitment by different pro curement professionals from within both public entities and private sec tor organisations, and we are for ever grateful for their contribution to the development of the 6%'s. ³The agency in 01 started the Mour ney towards the development of these standard bidding documents, which has brought us together today.
³This is part of the agency¶s bid to provide standardised documents as currently e[isting bidding documents used by different procuring entities are not harmonised, which opens room for non compliance, unsatisfactory adMu dication of tenders, and misinterpre tation of obligations by both tenderers and procuring entities,” he added.
0T& was the procuring enti ty for the tender, which was ap proved by the authority of the %oard. 0T& reTuested the unsuccessful bidder to apply for review with the agency within 10 worNing days.
³$ll tenderers who submitted bids are hereby notified that a period of 10 worNing days is hereby allowed for sub mission of any application for review,” said 0T&.
The agency also mentioned that the tender does not constitute a contract.