ESERA gives public feedback on tariff hike
MBABANE – The Eswatini Energy Regulatory Authority (ESERA) will today start giving feedback to emaSwati on the approved electricity tariff hike.
ESERA approveG an averaJe 0. per cent eOectricit\ hiNe for the \ear 202 2 anG an averaJe tariff increase of 8.02 per cent for 202 2 .
ESERA Chief Executive Officer CEO SiNhuPEu]o 7saEeG]e saiG there Zas a JeneraO resistance E\ the puEOic to participate in the puEOic hearinJs on eOectricit\ hiNe. +e saiG citi]ens PaGe severaO suEPissions GurinJ the puEOic revieZ.
³7heir feeOinJ is that their suEPis sions are not taNen into consiGera tion ´ saiG 7saEeG]e. +e aOso stateG that another reason necessitatinJ the feeGEacN Peet
9. 166/23 11. 604/23 12.1435/19 13.41/23 14.1221/23 15. 558/23 16.105/23 19. 649/23 20. 658/23 21. 621/23 inJs Zas the fact that other peopOe Zere concerneG that ESERA enGeG up taNinJ Gecisions Zithout coPinJ EacN to Jive theP aGvice on hoZ the\ arriveG at such Gecisions.
³7he\ have aGviseG the reJuOator that it ZouOG Ee JooG to stiOO coPe EacN to expOain to theP hoZ Ze ar riveG at our Gecision ´ he saiG.
Mnjoli Investments (Pty-Ltd) Vs
The Master Of The High Court & Another
Tibiyo Properties
Vs
Temangweni Preciou7s Zwane
(Pty-Ltd)
Tibiyo Properties
Vs
Siboniso Ncongwane
(Pty-Ltd)
Chris Van Annan
Vs
Natcom Of Police & Two Others
Nedbank Eswatini (Limited) Vs
Jd & Sons Investments (Pty-Ltd) & Five Others
Phindile Mantimakhulu N.o Vs
Machawe Sithole & Another
Ice World Premium
Eswatini Dev. Finance Corporation
Vs
Bongani Vusumuzi Dlamini& Another
Eswatini Dev. Finance Corporation
Vs
Bongani Vusumuzi Dlamini & Another
Riverstone Complex
Vs
Legacy Woodwork & Another
Violet Buluma
Vs
Musa Richard Maseko
The Grill Group
Pesche
Vs
Peter Graf
7he CEO aOso inGicateG that soPe citi]ens haG coPpOaineG aEout the technicaOit\ of the report Zhich Zas supposeG to Ee EroNen GoZn into siPpOer terPs for eas\ unGerstanGinJ.
+e saiG it Zas aOso necessar\ to ex pOain this to the peopOe GirectO\ rather than OeavinJ theP on the ZeEsite.
0eanZhiOe 7saEeG]e saiG the reJu Oator tooN an unGertaNinJ anG a proP ise to Jive feeGEacN to the puEOic.
Engagement
³7he ZhoOe essence or purpose of the process is to cOose the OoophoOe Eecause Ze vaOue enJaJePent anG feeGEacN Zith the puEOics Ze serve. 7he\ Geserve to NnoZ hoZ Ze ar riveG at such a criticaO Gecision ´ saiG 7saEeG]e. +e confesseG that the\ haG not Eeen JivinJ feeGEacN to the citi]ens in the past. +e saiG the\ haG taNen the puEOic¶s JuiGance. 22. 845/21 23.1621/23 24.673/23 25. 400/23 26. 135/23 27.549/23 28.468/23 29. 470/23 30. 1873/21 31.15/23 32. 671/23 33.1961/22
³7he purpose of this session is to inforP the puEOic on hoZ Ze reacheG those Gecisions anG then EreaN theP GoZn in a siPpOe anG unGerstanGaEOe Panner for theP.
³:e ZiOO aOso GePonstrate to theP hoZ Ze enGeG up coPinJ up Zith such Gecisions ´ he saiG. 0eanZhiOe the CEO saiG the\ haG scheGuOeG tZo initiaO PeetinJs.
+e saiG the first puEOic session ZouOG Ee heOG at 3huPOaPcashi +aOO at .a1JcaPphaOaOa. +e saiG the reason for theP to seOect that pOace Zas Eecause it Zas situateG on the southern siGe of the /uEoPEo Re Jion anG consisteG of a coPEination of interestinJ custoPers.
³7hat sphere is actuaOO\ Griven E\ aJro EaseG custoPers. So Ze have inviteG a Pixture of custoPers to the saPe haOO ´ the ESERA CEO hiJhOiJhteG.
+e further pointeG out that a seconG puEOic session ZouOG Ee heOG on 0a\
202 at the *eorJe +oteO.
Master Of The High Court & Another
Eswatini Dev. Finance
Corp
Vs
Muziwethu Nhlakanipho Langwenya
Logico Unlimited (Pty-Ltd) Vs
Sikhulile Melissa Hlophe
Setsabile Ncobile Nsibande(Dlamini)
Vs
Sifundo Bheki Nsibande
First National Bank Of Eswatini
Vs
Senel Investments Holdings(Ltd) & Another
Pots Construction
Santos Properties (Pty-Ltd) Vs
Polar Beauty Palour (Pty-Ltd)
Musa Motsa Attorneys
Vs
Tee And Jay Investments
Ncobile Tfobhi Gamedze (Mndzebele)
Vs
Kwanele Peter Gamedze & Two Others
Eswatini Revenue Service Vs
Hall Stacey (Pty-Limited)
Pentagon Distriction
Vs
Commit (Pty-Ltd)& Another
Tibiyo Takangwane Vs
Prime Properties
Encakini Investments (Pty-Ltd) Vs
Solomon M. Malaza