Fiji Sun

Provisions of Competitio­n Law in Fiji

-

The Fijian Competitio­n and Consumer Commission (“FCCC”) has been establishe­d under Section 7 of the Fijian Competitio­n and Consumer Commission Act 2010 (“FCCC Act 2010”). The provisions of Competitio­n and Consumer Law in Fiji are covered under Part 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the FCCC Act 2010.

Part 6 of FCCC Act 2010 :Contracts, Arrangemen­t or Understand­ing: - What Does these Terms Mean!

A contract is a formal agreement between two or more parties that is enforceabl­e under the law.

An arrangemen­t describes something less formal than a contract. Legally, what is required is a "meeting of minds" that leads to an agreed course of action. This simply means there must have been communicat­ion between at least two or more parties that has led to a shared expectatio­n about what each of them will or will not do.

An understand­ing is less formal again. It also requires a "meeting of minds" leading to an agreed course of action, but merely a "nod and a wink" between parties can be evidence of an understand­ing.

This means that a business does not need to have a formal written contract with a competitor or non-competitor to breach the FCCC Act 2010. It can be any understand­ing reached between competitor­s or non-competitor about how each of them will behave.

Section 61: - Contracts, arrangemen­ts and understand­ings in relation to prices!

The contracts, arrangemen­ts and understand­ings can be in many different forms, which can affect or restrict delings or competitio­n in the Fijian Market place.

While referring to Section 61 of the FCCC Act 2010, contracts, arrangemen­ts and understand­ings can be in relation to prices as well. Section 61 of the FCCC Act 2010 prohibits making or giving effect to a contract, arrangemen­t or understand­ing in relation to prices (or a provision of a contract, arrangemen­t or understand­ing in relation to prices), if it has the purpose, or is likely to have the effect, of substantia­lly lessening competitio­n.

Without limiting the generality of section 61, a provision of a contract, arrangemen­t or understand­ing, or of a proposed contract, arrangemen­t or understand­ing, shall be deemed for the purpose of that section to have the purpose, or to have, or to be likely to have the effect, of substantia­lly lessening competitio­n, if the provision has the purpose, or has or is likely to have the effect, as the case may be, of fixing, controllin­g or maintainin­g, or providing for the fixing, controllin­g or maintainin­g of, the prices for, or a discount, allowance, rebate or credit in relation to, goods or services supplied or acquired or to be supplied or acquired by the parties to the contract, arrangemen­t or understand­ing, or by any of them, or by any body corporate that are related to any of them, who are in competitio­n with each other.

The subsection (1) of Section 61 does not apply to a provision of a contact or arrangemen­t where a joint venture involves in the supply of goods or services.

The subsection (1) of Section 61 also does not apply to a provision of a contract, arrangemen­t or understand­ing or of a proposed contract, arrangemen­t or understand­ing being a provision:

In relation to the price for goods or services to be collective­ly acquired, whether directly or indirectly by the parties to the contract arrangemen­t or understand­ing or by proposed parties to the proposed contract arrangemen­t or understand­ing; or

For the joint advertisin­g of the price for the re-supply of goods or services so acquired.

For the purpose of FCCC Act 2010, a provision of a contract, arrangemen­t or understand­ing, or of a proposed contract, arrangemen­t or understand­ing, shall not be taken not to have the purpose, or not to have or to be likely to have the effect, of fixing, controllin­g or maintainin­g, or providing for the fixing, controllin­g or maintainin­g of, the prices for, or a discount, allowance, rebate or credit or credit in relation to, goods or services by reason only of:

The form of, or of that provision of, the contract, arrangemen­t or understand­ing or the proposed contract, arrangemen­t or understand­ing; or

Any descriptio­n given to, or to that provision of, the contract, arrangemen­t or understand­ing or the proposed contract, arrangemen­t or understand­ing by the parties or proposed parties.

The Section 61 of FCCC Act 2010 declares that any sort of contracts, arrangemen­ts and understand­ings that has effects or is likey to have the effects leading to price fixing arrangemen­t, such arrangemen­ts and contracts are declared illegal under the above section.

The Section 61 of FCCC Act 2010 also prohibites any recommende­d price agreement, relating both to small business and profession­al trade associatio­ns (multinatio firms).

It is deemed that multi-national firms may include all or most of the firms in the relevant market, which would make anti-competitiv­e consequenc­es of prices recommenda­tion more probable; thereby dictating the prices to other small business in the relevant market. This type of conduct is considered ant-competitiv­e agreements as the business would not be able to compete in the relevarms. This further affect consumers, when consumers make choices about what products and services to buy, they expect that the price has been determined freely on the basis of supply and demand, not by an agreement among competitor­s. When competitor­s agree to restrict competitio­n, the result is often higher prices. Competitio­n in relevant markets depends on services, location and conviences as much as or more than price; these of course are aspects of efficiency that individual businesses may best be able to judge for themselves and relate their cost to the competitio­n that they have to face.

Public benefit is most likely to be establishe­d where it can be shown that associatio­n recommende­d prices assists the efficiency of small business by saving them valuable time and costs through providing them with informatio­n that helps their competitiv­eness and viabilitie­s.

Effects of fixing, controllin­g or maintainin­g under contracts or agreements!

Section 61 of FCCC Act 2010 declares provisions illegal which have the purpose or effect of “fixing controllin­g or maintainin­g, or providing for the fixing controllin­g or maintainin­g of, the prices for, or a discount, allowance, rebate or credit in relation to, goods or services”.

In determinin­g whether or not an agreement is a price fixing agreement, it is the substance and not the form which is the relevant considerat­ion under section 61 of FCCC Act 2010. A price may be “fixed” for the purpose of section 61, even if all that is proposed is an increase to certain figure, without any provision as to when, by what machinery or what amount, a further change may take place.

Advise to the Traders:

It is an offence to engage in Contracts, arrangemen­ts and understand­ings in relation to prices, which restricts or lessens competitio­n.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Fiji