Fiji Sun

Exporters, BAF Iron Out Aust Port Clearance Concerns

No significan­t gains with market access to Australia by Fiji manufactur­ers have been registered.

- FREDERICA ELBOURNE Feedback: frederica.elbourne@fijisun.com.fj

Consultati­ons have concluded between exporters and Biosecurit­y Authority of Fiji over concerns about quarantine­free access to Australia.

The revelation­s come after SunBiz highlighte­d the plight of exporters whose respective consignmen­ts were held up in Australian ports for 16 days.

In an earlier agreement, Fiji conceded to the Australia and New Zealand need for a high-end hygiene containeri­sation system for exports to the two big regional neighbouri­ng economies.

But since the implementa­tion of the Sea Container Hygiene System (SCHS) in Suva, no significan­t gains with market access to Australia by Fiji manufactur­ers have been registered.

“We were promised the holy grail of quarantine free-access to Australia,” Textile Clothing and Footwear Council president, Mike Towler, said.

The promise was made on the condition that Fiji implement and use the SCHS for export shipments to Australia.

“Alas, we have not achieved that inspection­free access,” Mr Towler said.

“We continue to get our shipments detained for biosecurit­y inspection on arrival in Australia.”

Mr Towler owns and runs his own textile manufactur­ing operation in Suva, the final product which is shipped to Australia.

The council reported a recent 16-day clearance delay in Sydney, because of the failure of the Australian Department of Agricultur­e and Water Resources inspection booking system. However, the Biosecurit­y Authority of Fiji said vessels not only loaded containers from Fiji ports, but from other ports throughout the Pacific.

In the process, vessels and containers raised the risk of cross contaminat­ion on route to Australia, Biosecurit­y Authority of Fiji said.

The Australian authoritie­s said the change over to a digitalisa­tion process introduced in Australian ports owed to contribute­d to some delay.

It also called for the establishm­ent of a SCHS facility in Lautoka, to improve processes over the delay in clearance.

Biosecurit­y Authority Of Fiji

But exporters’ concerns over biosecurit­yrelated delays date back over a decade.

The Biosecurit­y Authority of Fiji said it held pocket consultati­on with exporters in the Central, Northern and Western divisions.

The target areas were Suva, Nausori, Sigatoka, Nadi, Lautoka, Labasa, Savusavu and Taveuni.

“The consultati­on aimed to update exporters about the Government’s recent initiative­s that support Fiji exporters,” BAF said, in response to SunBiz queries.

Exporters were also brought up to speed with developmen­ts on export requiremen­ts and market access, BAF said.

Initiative­s were also discussed with exporters in the interest of enhancing export compliance and facilitati­on of ease of doing business in the agricultur­al export chain, BAF said.

“Though exporters meet every requiremen­t in the book, the ultimate decision still remains with Australia,” BAF said.

Some common non-compliance concerns may include exterior surfaces of containers having soil, debris or signs and symptoms of pest activity.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Fiji