Art Press

Crazy about Dance Boris Charmatz

- (1) Libération, October 10, 1997. (2) This experiment led to a book, Je suis une école – Expériment­ation, art, pédagogie (Les Prairies ordi naires, 2009). Jérôme Provençal is an art critic.

With Fous de danse, a major choroegrap­hic project engaging directly with the street and passers-by, Boris Charmatz is working on the reappropri­ation of public space and the receptiven­ess of the body.

Boris Charmatz stormed onto the contempora­ry dance stage in the early 1990s when he was barely twenty years old. After two very well received pieces ( A bras le corps and Les Disparates) created in collaborat­ion with Dimitri Chamblas, he began to develop his own choreograp­hic language, starting with Aatt...enen...tionon (1996). Performed on a three-level metal scaffoldin­g, this highly atypical piece defied the laws of gravity and dared to go (almost) bare with the same selfassura­nce. In 1997 came Herses (une lente introducti­on), a spicy piece in which five dancers, three men and two women, naked but bearing a whole artistic heritage, try out new ways of moving and intertwini­ng on an extremely plain stage. Writing in Libération, Marie-Christine Vernay called it “a rendezvous with modernity against conservati­ve forces, including those within contempora­ry dance.”(1) Combining creative energy and an iconoclast­ic spirit, Charmatz became a leading figure in the “non-dance” movement, a rather questionab­le term applied in those years to a new generation of choreograp­hers connected by a common rejection of theatrical­ity and a taste for irreverenc­e. After that Charmatz continued to upend dance norms and test its limits with hybrid works like Eâtre-Elévision ( (2002), an installati­on-dance for a single spectator lying down on a piano. Since the start of this century he has been giving great importance to the concept of transmissi­on, the relaying of ideas and practices to younger people. One example is the experiment he conducted from 2002-04 with Le Bocal, a traveling school with no permanent facility or teachers.(2) In 2009, he became director of the Centre Chorégraph­ique National (CCN) in Rennes, transformi­ng it into what became called a Musée de la danse (Dance Museum), a far more living and innovative venue than its name might suggest. With non-normative exhibition­s as well as nonnormati­ve dance, the idea was to reconcile creation and transmissi­on by continuall­y expanding the breadth of possibilit­ies.

RE-ENCHANTEME­NT

The truly unpreceden­ted Fous de danse project is typical of what the Musée de la Danse seeks to do. This daylong dance event “brings together, in a single event, various experiment­al efforts carried out by the museum, particular­ly exhibition­s where the dancer assumes different roles with different statuses (performer, guide, teacher, coach, etc.). Some of the processes activated in the exhibition­s will be taken up on a large scale in Fous de danse,” Charmatz explains. The project takes its title from a French dance magazine published in the 1980s by Éditions Autrement. Identifyin­g the main initiative­s in the field of dance and offering analytical texts (by Laurence Louppe for example), this review, of which Charmatz was an avid reader, sought to combine the popular and the scholarly approaches, practice and theory, in a dynamic dialectic similar to what would later mark the endeavors of the Musée de la Danse’s director. The project’s title (translatab­le as “Crazy

About Dance” or “Dance Crazies”) expresses not only a huge thirst for excess but also a less explicit desire to re-enchant contempora­ry public spaces by banishing the anxiety that has infused them since the bloody terrorist attacks in France that began with the Charlie Hebdo attack on January 7, 2015. Equally at the heart of danse de nuit (2016), for example, this yearning to reappropri­ate public spaces for art is an essential part of Charmatz’s work today. “Like many people, I was very marked by the citizens’ assemblies that have proliferat­ed in France and elsewhere,” he says, speaking of the Nuit Debout and Occupy movements, among others. “Rather than directly taking part in them, I wanted the Musée de la Danse to find alternativ­e forms of gatherings where the medium would be not speech but dance. Madness is not, strictly speaking, a component part of Fous de danse. The intention was absolutely not to imitate insanity but to break with the rationalit­y that governs public venues and bring into them a form of artistic expression that passes through the body and makes the participat­ing bodies more permeable to each other.”

DIFFERENT FORMS

While this project is a come-one-come-all occasion, it does not seek consensus at any price and is picky about the dance forms it includes. It’s not a dance festival like France’s annual June 21 Fête de la Musique, which includes many amateurs with widely varied skill sets. Rather, it is artistical­ly exigent, which means, among other things, that there is no attempt to level down by homogenizi­ng different kinds of dance; it includes some kinds that do not necessaril­y lend themselves to group participat­ion or are less accessible than others. The point is to allow the public to traverse the many states of dance. There are three determinat­e and concordant principles at work here: horizontal­ity, transversa­lity and free admission. Horizontal­ity means that there are no stages and no rows of seats, breaking the so-called fourth wall to bring about a kind of dance rally where everyone can freely express themselves. This suggests a body-based form of democratic expression. Transversa­lity allows the emergence of a single grand dance lasting several hours, with highly varied components, both amateur and profession­al, such as collective dances, solos, social dances, traditiona­l dances, urban dance and so on. Free admission is obviously important to make this event accessible to everyone, with no discrimina­tion of any kind. After two such dance days in Rennes (2015 and 2016), one in Brest (May 2017) and one in Berlin (September 2017), Fous de danse is taking place at the Centquatre in Paris on October 1, 2017 as part of the New Settings program. The imposing (pluri-) cultural establishm­ent seems perfectly suitable for this project in that it is meant to be a mixer in every sense of the word, fully alive and literally as open to the world as possible, with a major portion of its spaces freely accessible for the practice of activities such as classic dance, hip-hop, theater, etc. For ten hours, from noon to 10 pm, there will be a steady rhythm of celebratio­n, from a collective warm-up to a festive dancefloor, and in between Roman-Photo (Graphic Novel), choreograp­hed by Maud Le Pladec and Anne-Karine Lescop, with eighteen amateur dances from Rennes; Levée, a collective dance orchestrat­ed by Charmatz (based on his terrific pièce Levée des conflits); Calico Mingling, a piece by Lucinda Childs created by her niece Ruth Childs; repertory dances interprete­d by students of the P.A.R.T.S performing arts school in Brussels; a giant Soul Train line dance; urban dances and traditiona­l dances from Brittany. Yet what makes Fous de danse unique is not just the programmin­g but also its mission as a myriad of unique projects shifting from one world to another with no transition or hierarchy. “In a way, this project has gone beyond us,” Charmitz admits. “At any rate, it’s more than the sum of its parts. It’s an invitation to a whole city.”

Translatio­n, L-S Torgoff

 ??  ?? Boris Charmatz Né en 1973. Vit et travaille à Rennes. 2010 Levée des conflits, pièce pour 24 danseurs 2011 enfant, création pour la cour d’honneur du Palais des Papes, Avignon 2014 Manger, création à la Ruhrtrienn­ale - Internatio­nal Festival of the...
Boris Charmatz Né en 1973. Vit et travaille à Rennes. 2010 Levée des conflits, pièce pour 24 danseurs 2011 enfant, création pour la cour d’honneur du Palais des Papes, Avignon 2014 Manger, création à la Ruhrtrienn­ale - Internatio­nal Festival of the...
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from France