EuroNews (English)

Shell is appealing a landmark climate ruling ordering the oil and gas giant to cut emissions by 45%

- Rosie Frost

This week, Shell will try to convince Dutch courts to repeal a historic climate ruling that ordered the fossil fuel giant to slash its greenhouse gas emissions.

In 2021, a landmark climate case saw The Hague order Shell to cut its carbon emissions by 45 per cent by 2030 compared to 2019, aiming to make the company align its business plans with Paris Agreement goals.

The ruling included both Shell’s own emissions and socalled Scope 3 emissions produced by consumers using its products - like those from people driving with Shell petrol in their cars.

New study: Climate change has made heat waves last longer, spike hotter, hurt more people Po Valley: Air pollution is causing serious health risks for more than 16 million Italians

The first-of-its-kind victory sparked a wave of other climate cases against other fossil fuel companies. At COP26 in Glasgow in 2021, the team behind the case even published a 70-page DIY manual titled ‘How We Defeated Shell’ encouragin­g others to follow in their footsteps.

Why is Shell appealing the landmark ruling?

While the oil and gas giant has stressed that it isn’t ignoring the court order - highlighti­ng billions in investment­s for the developmen­t of low-carbon energy and commitment­s to reduce emissions - it argues that the ruling goes too far.

“This case has no legal basis", Shell's lawyer Daan Lunsingh Scheurleer told the court on the first day of hearings, adding that the order “obstructs” the role the company wants to play in the energy transition.

The company claims implementi­ng the ruling would force it to shrink its business and shift customers to other fuel suppliers. Lunsingh Scheurleer emphasised how the energy crisis triggered by

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine had shown the importance of oil and gas in energy security and affordabil­ity during the transition.

Shell says it agrees that the world needs urgent climate action but has a different view on how that goal should be achieved.

Earlier this month, the oil and gas company weakened some of its climate targets.

Despite reaffirmin­g its goal to reach net zero by 2050, it scrapped an objective to cut emissions by 2035 citing strong demand for gas and uncertaint­y during the energy transition.

Shell is also aiming for a less ambitious 15 to 20 per cent reduction in the carbon intensity of its energy products by 2030.

Environmen­tal groups are confident in their claims

Milieudefe­nsie (Friends of the Earth Netherland­s) and the six other organisati­ons that brought the original case against the fossil fuel giant, however, are confident heading into the appeal.

“The scientific basis on which we’ve founded our claims against Shell has only solidified,” says Roger Cox, lawyer for the group.

The scientific basis on which we’ve founded our claims against Shell has only solidified. Roger Cox Milieudefe­nsie lawyer

Extreme weather, crop failures and record-breaking temperatur­es around the world since the ruling could help to strengthen the case. The legal team plans to draw on new evidence from internatio­nal bodies too. Findings from the latest IPCC report, for example, highlight that the risks posed by climate change have increased in the years since 2021.

‘Problem child’: Transport on track to produce nearly half of Europe’s emissions by 2030 Slovakia plans to be coal-free by 2024, 6 years earlier than originally planned

“In court, it’s fact that matters which is why I am confident that we can once again convince the judges that Shell needs to act in line with internatio­nal climate agreements,” Cox adds.

Milieudefe­nsie also points out that Shell’s annual emissions are several times those of the Netherland­s which it says means the multinatio­nal company also shares the responsibi­lity of curbing greenhouse gases.

“Shell is constantly trying to run away from its responsibi­lity to stop dangerous climate change, but they can't bolt from the courtroom,” says Donald Pols, director of Milieudefe­nsie.

“Climate scientists warn that we need to act even faster than originally thought. Shell may keep putting up smokescree­ns, but the facts are crystal clear. Their emissions need to be drasticall­y cut.”

Both sides will make their arguments this week and a verdict is expected in the second half of this year. Regardless of the outcome, an appeal is expected at the Dutch Supreme Court in the future.

 ?? ?? Shell is appealing a landmark climate ruling made by Dutch courts.
Shell is appealing a landmark climate ruling made by Dutch courts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from France