Kathimerini English

When the ex-king plotted to ‘eliminate’ Karamanlis

Documents from the Konstantin­os Karamanlis archives cast light on 1975-1978 machinatio­ns to overthrow, even assassinat­e, the premier

- SPECIAL CONTRIBUTO­R

An amazing story featuring the former king Constantin­e, his loyal adjutant Major Michalis Arnaoutis and the British secret services can be found in Konstantin­os Karamanlis’ archives. It concerns plots to assassinat­e Karamanlis and to overthrow the democratic regime through a military coup. When the 12-volume “Karamanlis Archives” were published in 1997, they included the informatio­n that Karamanlis was informed in 1975 of a planned royal coup against him by Vice Admiral Spyros Konofaos, the chief of naval operations. Two years later, in 1999, Leonidas Papagos’ book “Notes – 1967-1977” was published. The ambassador and son of Alexandros Papagos, who had collaborat­ed with Constantin­e, noted that Arnaoutis was planning a coup against Karamanlis in 1975 and had unsuccessf­ully attempted to involve Admiral Ioannis Vassiliadi­s in the conspiracy. Vassiliadi­s, who has passed away, as has Papagos, confirmed this informatio­n in 1999, immediatel­y after the publicatio­n of Papagos’ book. Today Kathimerin­i reveals that the conspiracy was not momentary, but remained active for two-and-a-half years, and that, during its planning, even the possibilit­y of assassinat­ing Karamanlis and other politician­s was discussed. It is a shady story which began in the autumn of 1975 and lasted until the beginning of 1978. What is also shocking is the revelation that the British secret services had installed a monitoring system to record Constantin­e’s conversati­ons in London. And so they recorded him when he met with envoys of military officers who were conspiring in Athens and gave all the informatio­n – but not the tapes – to Karamanlis. The entire case was handled by the diplomat Petros Molyviatis, a long-time confidant of the Greek prime minister and his chief of staff.

Rallis’ informatio­n

Karamanlis was first informed of the former king’s steps to overthrow him by his minister Georgios Rallis in early October 1975. Navy officer Vassiliadi­s had told him that he had been approached by Constantin­e’s close associate, Arnaoutis, who told him that “a military movement was being set up to overthrow Karamanlis and reinstate the former king.” Arnaoutis assured Vassiliadi­s that Constantin­e “had already secured the interventi­on of the Shah to contain Turkey and that the Shah would also support him financiall­y.” As Karamanlis himself wrote in a note included in his archives, a few days later another one of his ministers, Evangelos Averoff, was informed by General Ioannis Davos, the army chief of staff, that Arnaoutis had also approached a general. The flow of informatio­n continued with Chief of Naval Operations Spyros Konofaos notifying Karamanlis of similar moves by Constantin­e’s adjutant. [1]

Konofaos’ report

A report was given to then prime minister Karamanlis by the chief of naval operations, Vice Admiral Spyros Konofaos, who was one of the leading figures of the anti-dictatoria­l movement of the Hellenic Navy in 1973. Konofaos was informed by the fleet’s chief engineer, Captain Pierros Panagiotar­eas, that he had been approached by Arnaoutis in October 1975. He claimed that Greece had been cut off from the West and that Karamanlis’ government was “tolerating the maligning of the armed forces.” These developmen­ts “led a significan­t number of army officers, serving mainly in Eastern Macedonia and Thrace, to the decision to intervene in order to save the country from the impending disaster,” stressed Arnaoutis, adding that “the former king also supports the need for such an interventi­on.” Arnaoutis also made it clear that “this interventi­on will be carried out regardless of the participat­ion of the navy and the air force, and any reaction will be met by arms.” Constantin­e’s confidant foresaw that the coup would take place in February 1976 and that “it would be preceded by the political or physical eliminatio­n of the president of the government or by the conclusion of a humiliatin­g agreement for Cyprus.” That is to say, they even envisaged the assassinat­ion of Karamanlis. The plan was that a referendum would be held, apparently to restore the monarchy, within 15-30 days, and parliament­ary elections within eight months or so.

Panagiotar­eas and two other officers who attended the meeting with Arnaoutis expressed doubt as to whether the former king agreed with his adjutant’s plans. Consequent­ly, Konofaos gave Panagiotar­eas permission to go to London and

Arnaoutis foresaw that the coup would take place in February 1976 and that

‘it would be preceded by the political or physical eliminatio­n of the president of the government’

meet with Constantin­e on Monday, October 13, 1975. At this meeting, Konofaos wrote in his confidenti­al note to Karamanlis, “the former king essentiall­y confirmed what was said by Colonel Arnaoutis (retired).” There were some minor disagreeme­nts. The former king instructed Panagiotar­eas to brief Konofaos and to inform Arnaoutis of his reactions when he returned to Athens. However, Arnaoutis never came back to Athens, under the pretext that he was under surveillan­ce, and he arranged a new meeting between Panagiotar­eas and Constantin­e in London on November 16, 1975. He made it clear there that the CNO was not even discussing participat­ing in a coup and that the fleet would resist such an eventualit­y by all means. Constantin­e replied that since the air force also disagreed, he “would have no further involvemen­t” and claimed that he had been visited by a representa­tive of the American government, who said that the army, according to their informatio­n, intended to overthrow the Greek government, and expressed the trust the American government placed in him. Constantin­e added that the representa­tive of the American government recommende­d that he should lead the armed forces in order to reduce the dangers involved. [2]

Panagiotar­eas’ note

In the briefing note that Panagiotar­eas wrote after the meeting with the former king at his home in London, he also stated that Constantin­e told him that he had “met with the British prime minister, who told him that in his opinion he would have to play a significan­t role in Greece again, because no other political figure, beyond Karamanlis, was in the picture.”

Constantin­e was distressed because he had traveled to Iran and Saudi Arabia to secure a 2-billion-dollar loan which he would use if he succeeded in being reinstated to the throne. Panagiotar­eas commented that the “king seemed disappoint­ed and overwhelme­d, in contrast with their previous meeting where he seemed determined.”

After receiving this informatio­n, Karamanlis sent Leonidas Papagos, who had previously been a collaborat­or of Constantin­e, as an envoy to London in early 1976. “I asked him to go to London and advise the former king to

stop plotting,” Karamanlis wrote in his note, and continued: “Mr Papagos came back and told me that the former king had indeed met with Panagiotar­eas but that the conversati­on revolved around the overall situation of Greece and was not conspirato­rial. The former king then called Arnaoutis and asked for informatio­n about the allegation­s against him. He confirmed that he had indeed had the meetings in Athens reported by Panagiotar­eas. Mr Papagos also told me that the former king was in a state of embarrassm­ent and disappoint­ment at the moment he conveyed my message to him.” [3]

The British inform Karamanlis

A few months later, on October 14, 1976, British ambassador to Greece Brooks Richards visited Karamanlis at his request and informed him that Constantin­e was in contact with conspirato­rs in Athens and that he “does not have the initiative of the conspiracy, but is aware of it and certainly does not discourage it.” In a confidenti­al note later written by the prime minister’s chief of staff, ambassador Molyviatis, he reported that, according to the British diplomat, “the British government does not know who the conspirato­rs in Greece are. But they believe, based on their informatio­n, that the aim is to overthrow the regime, that they are fanatics and ruthless, and that their most probable method of action is political assassinat­ions, with the prime minister being their first target.” The British ambassador concluded by telling the prime minister that, if he wished, “the British government is willing to make the necessary appeal to the former king in this regard.”

From that meeting on, a diplomatic and espionage thriller began to unfold.

October 21, 1976. The British ambassador paid another visit to Karamanlis and reported to him that the brother of the editor of Eleftheros Kosmos newspaper, Vassilios Konstantop­oulos, had visited the king in London on behalf of a group of army officers loyal to Dimitrios Ioannidis. He told him that a coup was imminent, probably on November 13, as officers opposed to the government were to be dismissed immediatel­y after that date.

The plan was to keep the units in the camps and arrest only senior officers. The conspirato­rs were concerned “that there would be difficulti­es in the capital because the Left would spark a popular mobilizati­on.”

Konstantop­oulos, according to the

British ambassador, told the king that “he would be notified a few days before the coup and should stand ready in London or another European city, when called upon.” The king, for his part, said he would get in touch with Konofaos to check the navy’s position, he anticipate­d that the United States, France, West Germany and England would react adversely, and that he believed the best date for the coup was November 2, the day of the American elections.

But the British ambassador made a shocking revelation at the end of the meeting with Karamanlis, for he assured him that “it is absolutely verifiable that the above was communicat­ed between the former king and Vassilios Konstantop­oulos.” In diplomatic and intelligen­ce services jargon, this meant that the British services had secretly recorded the conversati­on, having obviously placed the necessary equipment in the former king’s residence, or having otherwise intercepte­d his telephone calls.

October 26, 1976. On Karamanlis’ order, Molyviatis went to the British ambassador and asked him for more informatio­n about Constantin­e’s meetings with Konstantop­oulos. The ambassador revealed that Konstantop­oulos said that “those on the move in Greece were junior officers and that they would carry out political assassinat­ions. The former king asked for Mr Averoff, with whom he had an old friendship, to be spared.” The ambassador lastly told Molyviatis that he had notified the Americans of this informatio­n and that “all the informatio­n was provided on the personal orders of Prime Minister [James] Callaghan.”

On the afternoon of that same day, the second-in-command at the American Embassy, Hawthorne Q. Mills, asked for an urgent meeting with the prime minister and told him that they knew of the British informatio­n but could not verify it. He said, however, that the Americans were willing to assist the Greek government with an appeal to the king, if the Greek prime minister so wished.

October 27, 1976. Molyviatis invited the British ambassador to his office and asked him if his government would agree to the release of informatio­n about the conspiracy and the king’s involvemen­t. He also asked “whether it would be possible, for our convenienc­e, for them to give us the tapes from which we assume the informatio­n came.” The ambassador, Molyviatis wrote in his report afterward, “refrained from asking for instructio­ns, but admitted informally that the tapes indeed existed.”

October 29, 1976. The British ambassador met with Karamanlis. He told him that although he did not yet have instructio­ns, his government’s response would be negative both in providing the tapes to the Greek services and in making the informatio­n public. Karamanlis asked for Callaghan’s assistance in moving forward with the Greek investigat­ions.

The British ambassador called Molyviatis sometime later and told him that he had suggested an “expert” be sent to Athens to provide all the evidence. He made it clear, however, that London did not want their informatio­n to be made public, nor

did they want it to be known that it was from an English source, while the answer to the request to hand over the tapes of the king’s monitoring was negative.

November 1, 1976. The “expert,” apparently a member of the secret service MI6, Kenneth Parsons, attended a meeting with minister of public order Georgios Stamatis, the general secretary of the same ministry, Anastasios Balkos, Molyviatis and the British ambassador. The English agent gave a full briefing and revealed that Constantin­e and Konstantop­oulos had also discussed the assassinat­ion of Karamanlis. Spyros Theotokis was to be appointed prime minister after the coup, while the officers involved in it were mainly under Ioannidis’ influence.

November 2, 1976. Molyviatis called the British ambassador again and asked that the British government make an appeal to the king making it clear that his “conspirato­rial activities are not permissibl­e on British soil.” But the ambassador replied that although London had offered to make such an appeal, it had “concluded that due to the family ties between the royal family of England and the former king, it would be better to have the Americans make the relevant appeal.” Molyviatis commented in his note to Karamanlis that this was apparently the reason why the second-in-command at the American Embassy in Athens had paid him a visit. And the British ambassador recommende­d that Karamanlis should ask the American ambassador to make the appeal to the king.

November 4, 1976. The British ambassador told Molyviatis that prime minister Callaghan himself had met with the former king “to make it clear to him the importance the British place on their good relations with the government of Mr Karamanlis and to warn him not to engage in any conspirato­rial activity against the Karamanlis government while he remains on British soil.”

November 8, 1976. Molyviatis informed the British ambassador that the Greek government had sent a special envoy to the king, who told him that “they are aware of his activities and advised him to refrain from them in the future. The former king categorica­lly denied the charges against him.”

18 November 1976. The British ambassador talked to Molyviatis and told him that Callaghan made the appeal to Constantin­e without giving any details.

At the end of Molyviatis’ note there is a handwritte­n note by Karamanlis saying “G. Rallis to London.” By that, it appears that Karamanlis also sent Rallis to the British capital to meet Constantin­e, who “denied everything.” [4]

1. Note by Konstantin­os Karamanlis, Archives of the Konstantin­os Karamanlis Foundation, 43-1402

2. Note by Spyros Konofaos to the president of the government, Archives of the Konstantin­os Karamanlis Foundation, 431409

3. Note by Konstantin­os Karamanlis, Archives of the Konstantin­os Karamanlis Foundation, 43-1402

4. Note by the prime minister’s chief of staff, Petros Molyviatis, Konstantin­os Karamanlis Foundation, 43-1416

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Konstantin­os Karamanlis (r) speaks with former king Pavlos, as a young Constantin­e looks on. Karamanlis said he avoided making Constantin­e’s plotting public, ‘out of respect for the memory of his father.’
Konstantin­os Karamanlis (r) speaks with former king Pavlos, as a young Constantin­e looks on. Karamanlis said he avoided making Constantin­e’s plotting public, ‘out of respect for the memory of his father.’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Greece