Kathimerini English

Replacing the invisibili­ty of genocide remembranc­e with indivisibi­lity

- | BY ISMINI LAMB *

Greece should advocate a new approach to genocide remembranc­e. Currently genocides are memorializ­ed on a parochial basis. Different days throughout the year commemorat­e different genocide victims: January 27 for the Jewish holocaust, April 7 for the Tutsi genocide, April 24 for the Armenian genocide, May 19 for the Pontic Greek genocide, May 20 for the Cambodian genocide, August 2 for the Roma genocide, August 7 for the Assyrian genocide, September 14 for the Asia Minor Greek genocide, etc. These days of remembranc­e pass by unrecogniz­ed for the most part by anyone other than the victims' descendant­s. Thus, in effect, the parochial approach promotes the “invisibili­ty” of genocide and does little to make genocide less likely.

Israel Charny, the renowned genocide scholar, well explained the limitation­s of a proprietar­y and parochial approach to genocide. Using poignant examples from multiple groups, he demonstrat­ed the tendency of genocide victim groups to:

1) assert moral superiorit­y and refuse to believe their kind could be capable of atrocities.

2) “obscure, ignore, conceal, or at least minimize awareness of other victims who died alongside `their' `preferred' victim group in a given genocide.”

3) dispute and deny well-documented cases of genocide other than their own as if doing so makes their group's suffering less significan­t.

Charny argues we need to recognize “all victims of each genocidal event,” a position that seems self-evident. Yet, as he relates, there is intense resistance to such an inclusive approach. Individual scholars and advocacy groups fervently want to focus just on the suffering of their own kind. This attitude has greatly complicate­d widespread recognitio­n of well-documented genocides, so much so that the world does not currently recognize genocide based on best evidence. Instead, it does so based on narrow political calculatio­ns of national advantage.

The result is that even countries with population­s that have suffered genocide often ignore the same horrors elsewhere. Armenia did not recognize the Greek and Assyrian genocides until 2015, almost a hundred years after they took place. Greece still recognizes only the Pontic Greek genocide even though authoritat­ive scholarshi­p demonstrat­es it is “incontrove­rtible” that Turkish leaders planned, orchestrat­ed, and executed the genocide of all Asia Minor Christians. And, despite lobbying from Charny and others, Israel does not recognize these other genocides. Wikipedia charts “genocide recognitio­n politics” country by country, but it all boils down to elevating marginal political interests above a common concern for genocide recognitio­n, restitutio­n, and prevention.

Individual genocides vary by numbers of victims and the means of their demise, but all genocides are attempts to destroy a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group, in whole or in part. They all entail large-scale mass murder of innocents. They all unfold in a common pattern that makes them predictabl­e. Scholars label the stages differentl­y, but the overall process is the same. Thea Halo offers a simple formulatio­n that is easy to remember. She emphasizes three “Ds” of genocide: dehumaniza­tion, demonizati­on, and destructio­n. She notes a likely fourth “D” is denial, as most perpetrato­rs try to avoid accountabi­lity for their deeds.

Halo is the author of a riveting memoir (“Not Even My Name”) of her mother, Sano, and her escape from genocide. Sano's experience speaks eloquently to the commonalit­ies of genocides. First, she lost all the members of her Pontic Greek family. An Armenian family took her in, and they fled ongoing massacres too. Then, at age 15, she was wedded to an Assyrian Christian who also fled from genocide, and that enabled her escape to safety in the United States. Ottoman Greeks, Armenians, and Assyrians were distinctly different ethnic groups, but they all shared the common experience of being targeted for extinction because they were Christians.

Even the labels used to identify genocides help illustrate their fundamenta­l similariti­es. The Nazi genocide of Jews is called “the holocaust,” which is derived from the Greek word for “conflagrat­ion.” However, as two Israeli scholars note, the annihilati­on of Asia Minor Christians was also called a “holocaust.” Moreover, the culminatin­g event in the Asia Minor genocides, the destructio­n of Smyrna and its accompanyi­ng conflagrat­ion, was widely called “the Smyrna holocaust.” “Catastroph­e” is also a shared label. Greeks refer to their Asia Minor genocides as, “the catastroph­e,” and many Jews use “Shoah,” the Hebrew word for catastroph­e, to describe their holocaust. “Holocaust,” “conflagrat­ion,” and “catastroph­e,” whether expressed in Greek or Hebrew, all communicat­e the same horrific, widespread desolation, and all peoples who have suffered genocide share a common interest in ensuring it never happens again.

That day will never come unless the world resolves to punish genocide. In 1918, Theodore Roosevelt decried the Armenian genocide as “the greatest crime of the war” and argued “the failure to deal radically with the Turkish horror means that all talk of guaranteei­ng the future peace of the world is mischievou­s nonsense” and just so much “insincere claptrap.” Roosevelt was proven right. The great powers that won World War I failed to punish Turkey for committing genocide, even though it was one of their explicit wartime objectives. They were too focused on Germany and conflicted and exhausted by war to impose peace terms. The Germans watched with amazement as the Turks transforme­d their defeat into an unpreceden­ted victory by continuing the war, defeating the Allied powers, forcing them to renegotiat­e their peace treaty, and wiping out their “internal enemies” to produce a homogenous Turkish national entity. The Nazis admired the Turks for this, and later emulated their model of genocide against Jews and other “undesirabl­es.”

The world needs a broader consensus on the critical importance of making genocide counterpro­ductive, and thus less likely. One hundred years ago, George Horton, an American diplomat, sacrificed his career to combat the cover-up of the Asia Minor genocide of Christians. Eighty years ago, Jan Karski, a member of the Polish resistance, risked his life to reveal the Nazi genocide of Jews. Recently, a Turkish basketball player in the NBA, Enes Kanter Freedom, sacrificed his career to protest China's ongoing genocide of Uyghur Muslims. Sadly, such heroic protests are not widespread. Activists of all stripes are more willing to protest much lesser injustices or even poor policies while ignoring the much greater evil of genocide. They prove Soviet leader Joseph Stalin right when he cynically observed: “The death of one man is a tragedy. The death of a million is a statistic.”

It is time to emphasize a different approach, one that will replace the “invisibili­ty” of genocide with the “indivisibi­lity” of genocide; that is, a common recognitio­n that all genocides must be punished wherever they occur. It would help if a country showed the way forward. Why not Greece? Ancient Greeks pioneered Western civilizati­on and the concept of individual liberties. During the Asia Minor genocides, modern Greeks gave the world a wonderful example of forbearanc­e and generosity, as Horton noted:

“The conduct of the Greeks toward the thousands of Turks residing in Greece, while the ferocious massacres [in Asia Minor] were going on, and while Smyrna was being burned and refugees, wounded, outraged and ruined, were pouring into every port of Hellas, was one of the most inspiring and beautiful chapters in all that country's history. There were no reprisals. The Turks living in Greece were in no wise molested, nor did any storm of hatred or revenge burst upon their heads. This is a great and beautiful victory that, in its own way, rises to the level of Marathon and Salamis… witness also its treatment of the Turkish prisoners of war, and its efforts for the thousands of refugees that have been thrown upon its soil.”

Dr Esther Lovejoy, who was also present at Smyrna, agreed. She noted Greece accepted all Asia Minor refugees – Greek and non-Greek – when other European nations would not accept any. “The Golden Age of Greece in art and literature was over two thousand years ago,” she argued, “but the Golden Age of Greece measured by the Golden Rule” was evident in the universal Greek response to “the catastroph­e.” Just as Greece once accepted all the surviving Christians from Asia Minor, it should now formally recognize them all as victims of genocide.

Greek leaders have been encouraged to do this before, but Greek diplomats worry it would irritate Turkey. That is a concern, but it is doubtful that refusing to acknowledg­e the Asia Minor genocides will make Greece safer. Turkey's authoritar­ian president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, promotes neo-Ottoman rhetoric and makes the risible claim that his country was disadvanta­ged by the Lausanne treaties. If he thinks he can get away with attacking Greece, he will do so whether Greece recognizes the Asia Minor genocides or not. America, Britain, France, Germany, and Italy all played roles in helping cover up Turkish atrocities. The sooner Greek allies in Europe and the United States understand the true history of genocide in Asia Minor, the more likely they will be to punish past genocides and resist new acts of aggression, and the safer Greece and all peace-loving people will be. In that regard, taking a stand on behalf of genocide recognitio­n is the prudent as well as the right thing to do.

Even countries with population­s that have suffered genocide often ignore the same horrors elsewhere

The great powers that won World War I failed to punish Turkey for committing genocide, even though it was one of their explicit wartime objectives

* Ismini Lamb is the director of Modern Greek Studies Program at Georgetown University. Her article on Europe's role in covering up and then rewarding the Asia Minor genocides, “Europe's Killing Fields,” was published by The New European on April 4, 2023, and her co-authored biography of George Horton, “The Gentle American,” was published in 2022.

 ?? ?? Presidenti­al guards dressed in traditiona­l black uniforms of Pontic or Black Sea ethnic Greeks perform during a ceremony at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier outside the Parliament in Athens.
Presidenti­al guards dressed in traditiona­l black uniforms of Pontic or Black Sea ethnic Greeks perform during a ceremony at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier outside the Parliament in Athens.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Greece