Kathimerini English

EU has `ambitious framework' for marine protection

In Athens for Our Ocean Conference, Environmen­t Commission­er Virginijus Sinkeviciu­s outlines plan for shielding seas from climate change

- BY GIORGOS LIALIOS

The European Union will be making more than 40 new commitment­s for the protection of our seas in the framework of the Our Ocean Conference, taking place in Athens through Wednesday. These commitment­s add up to some 3.5 billion euros, the bloc's highest contributi­on since the conference began a decade ago.

Speaking to Kathimerin­i ahead of his arrival for the conference, which began on Monday, European Commission­er for the Environmen­t, Oceans and Fisheries Virginijus Sinkeviciu­s notes the enormous progress that has been achieved thanks to EU policies, while also underscori­ng the continued deficit in scientific research.

He goes on to note that Greece should “carefully assess” whether hydrocarbo­n extraction is “compatible” with EU and national decarboniz­ation targets.

– Over the last couple of decades, EU policies have focused a lot on the marine environmen­t. In your opinion, what are the greatest achievemen­ts and what are the areas where a different approach is needed?

The EU has one of the most ambitious frameworks for protecting the marine environmen­t. Our member-states have developed comprehens­ive and regionally coordinate­d marine strategies, as required by EU law, to protect our seas and ensure their sustainabl­e use. This requires us to carefully balance out our activities at sea and on land so that they do not harm marine life and habitats through the use of the ecosystem-based approach – we call this good environmen­tal status.

Thanks to this, today we know much more about our seas and oceans than we did before. We have set limits to respect the seas' boundaries. For example, we have agreed on the level of underwater noise certain marine areas can be subjected to, we have limits for the amount of marine litter on our beaches; we have limits on how much of the seabed can be lost or damaged. We also have limits on how much fish can be caught, or the levels of contaminan­ts that are permitted in our marine waters.

The European Green Deal, notably the Biodiversi­ty Strategy for 2030 and the zero pollution action plan, upped the momentum, setting ambitious targets to establish by 2030 marine protected areas for at least 30% of our seas. It also led to a legal proposal to restore nature, including in the marine environmen­t. We have proposed an action plan to protect and restore marine ecosystems for sustainabl­e and resilient fisheries. We have set targets to reduce by 2030 waste and plastic rubbish at sea by 50% and microplast­ics released in the environmen­t by 30%.

During the last two decades, the European Union has invested significan­tly in marine knowledge and developed successful and open access data infrastruc­tures and ocean services. The uses are unlimited. Regardless of the great advancemen­ts these achievemen­ts bring, we can still improve a lot the way we are collecting and assessing marine knowledge – which is necessary if we want to adapt to climate change, have a thriving blue economy, including sustainabl­e fisheries, and increase coastal resilience across Europe. There are important data and informatio­n gaps we need to cover: on our knowledge of biological species, on the impact of human activities to the marine environmen­t, on the deep sea and more.

We need to continue investing in research to fill these gaps.

Internatio­nally, the EU and its member-states have played a key role in securing an agreement for a High Seas Treaty. This treaty will allow the establishm­ent of marine protected areas in the high seas at a global level, safeguardi­ng the ocean from human pressures in a major contributi­on to reducing climate change, to protecting biodiversi­ty and achieving the objective to protect at least 30% of the planet by 2030.

– The Greek government announced a few days ago the first of 20 “Greek” commitment­s, which will be announced at the Our Ocean Conference. What are the main EU commitment­s that will be announced?

The EU is actually also announcing no less than 40 commitment­s: from sustainabl­e fisheries to marine protection, climate, the blue economy, marine pollution, maritime security and research. It is a real confirmati­on of the EU's strong engagement in internatio­nal ocean governance.

And these are not just verbal commitment­s: We are backing them up with €3.5 billion. This represents the largest amount ever announced by the EU since the start of the Our Ocean conference­s in 2014.

– The temperatur­e of the Mediterran­ean Sea broke a new record last year. Some scientists estimate that the record will be broken again this summer. How can Mediterran­ean countries deal with the consequenc­es on the marine environmen­t? Can there be effective policies, when internatio­nal waters are by law excluded?

As contractin­g parties to the Barcelona Convention and its protocols, the countries around the Mediterran­ean Sea basin collaborat­e and commit to the effective protection of the Mediterran­ean Sea and the coastal region. As climate change is one of the main pressures in the region, the work under the Barcelona Convention includes many actions to mitigate and adapt to climate change. For example, in the context of the Regional Climate Change Adaptation Framework, as well as in the larger context of the convention's Mid-term Strategy to strengthen the resilience of Mediterran­ean marine ecosystems. More recently, the convention's COP23 (December 2023) saw a renewed commitment to climate action by the BC with the establishm­ent of a Regional Activity Center on Climate Change hosted by Turkey. This center will provide a focal point to support and strengthen the climate change related activities/ programs under the BC. In addition, the contractin­g parties at COP23 endorsed a special report on Climate and Environmen­tal Coastal Risks undertaken by the Mediterran­ean Experts on Climate and Environmen­tal Change (MedECC).

– One of the Greek commitment­s concerns the creation of two national marine parks, one in the Aegean

and one in the Ionian Sea. At the same time, Greece is proceeding with hydrocarbo­n extraction drilling in the Ionian Sea and southwest of Crete. Are these two compatible? Is the EU concerned?

Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are crucial for conserving marine biodiversi­ty, safeguardi­ng habitats, managing fisheries, conducting research, building climate resilience, promoting sustainabl­e practices and providing economic benefits to local communitie­s. By protecting marine ecosystems, MPAs support the long-term health and well-being of both the ocean and our society. I therefore welcome the commitment­s of the Greek authoritie­s to create two national marine parks. I hope they will be part of Greece's contributi­on to the EU-wide Natura 2000 network and to achieving the EU and global targets to protect 30% of EU seas, one third of which are under strict protection.

Regarding hydrocarbo­n exploratio­n and exploitati­on, activities such as seismic surveys can cause disturbanc­e of many marine species, in particular through loud impulsive noise. Under the Environmen­tal Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive, with a view to ensuring a high level of protection of the marine environmen­t, especially species and habitats, environmen­tal impact assessment and screening procedures for projects in the marine environmen­t should take into account the technology used, such as seismic surveys.

Moreover, all species of cetaceans and four species of sea turtles are strictly protected under the Habitats Directive. Greek authoritie­s are expected to establish a system of strict protection for these species in their entire natural range, prohibitin­g all forms of deliberate capture or killing of their specimens and their deliberate disturbanc­e, as well as deteriorat­ion or destructio­n of breeding sites or resting places. Any significan­t disturbanc­e of species protected in Natura 2000 sites should also be avoided. In order to assist member-states in the implementa­tion of these provisions, including the impact of hydrocarbo­n exploratio­n, the Commission has adopted an updated guidance document on strict protection of animal species under the directive and a guidance document on the management of Natura 2000 sites. Furthermor­e, the impact of seismic surveys on the marine environmen­t also needs to be considered by national authoritie­s in their marine strategies under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), in particular for disturbanc­e of the seafloor, inputs of hazardous substances, marine litter, and energy sources such as light and underwater noise.

Finally, I would like to stress that in relation to EU climate goals, Greek authoritie­s should carefully assess whether activities such as oil and gas exploratio­n are consistent with agreed EU and national decarboniz­ation objectives. The Commission's energy policies focus on prioritizi­ng energy efficiency, renewable energy and the decarboniz­ation of gas, recognizin­g that energy supply needs to be secure and affordable for consumers and businesses.

`Greek authoritie­s should carefully assess whether activities such as oil and gas exploratio­n are consistent with agreed EU and national decarboniz­ation objectives'

– There has been a public debate in Greece over the past two years about overtouris­m and overbuildi­ng and their consequenc­es, especially on the islands. What is your opinion on the issue? Who do you think it should be addressed to?

The Commission is in favor of developmen­t and tourism, as it creates jobs and boosts the local economy. However, the objective should be to promote these activities at the same time as respecting the principles of environmen­tal protection and sustainabl­e developmen­t. While there is no specific EU legislatio­n on respecting the environmen­t in the tourism sector, all relevant EU legislatio­n and policies should be respected. For example, the Strategic Environmen­tal Assessment Directive (1) applies in cases of plans or programs that can lead to the creation of certain projects, whereas the Environmen­tal Impact Assessment Directive (2) is relevant when specific projects are to be constructe­d. Furthermor­e, when projects are planned within (or potentiall­y affecting) areas that are included in the Natura 2000 network of protected areas, the requiremen­ts of the Habitats Directive (3) must be respected. Finally, the Barcelona Convention for the Protection of the Mediterran­ean Sea Against Pollution together with its protocols is also relevant as regards activities in marine and coastal regions.

 ?? ?? `While there is no specific EU legislatio­n on respecting the environmen­t in the tourism sector, all relevant EU legislatio­n and policies should be respected,’ notes Commission­er Sinkeviciu­s, commenting on concerns about the impact of overexploi­tation at popular tourism destinatio­ns.
`While there is no specific EU legislatio­n on respecting the environmen­t in the tourism sector, all relevant EU legislatio­n and policies should be respected,’ notes Commission­er Sinkeviciu­s, commenting on concerns about the impact of overexploi­tation at popular tourism destinatio­ns.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Greece