Stabroek News Sunday

Drinkers risk exceeding legal driving limit by underestim­ating how drunk they are

-

(University of Cambridge) - As many as a half of all drinkers underestim­ated how drunk they were, judging themselves still safe to drive despite having exceeded the legal driving limit, a new study has found.

Worldwide, drunk driving is a major problem, despite decades of health promotion activities. Road traffic injuries have become the leading killer of people aged five to 29 years, and recently, the World Health Organizati­on has said that alcoholrel­ated traffic accidents are one of the major causes. In 2019, between 210 and 250 people were killed in accidents in Britain where at least one driver was over the drink-drive limit, the highest level since 2009.

Drinking alcohol causes significan­t impairment to our motor function, and the more we drink, the worse this becomes. Drunk drivers may struggle to keep their vehicle in lane and have slow reaction times, as well as being more likely to take risks.

In research published today in the Harm Reduction Journal, a team of researcher­s from Witten/Herdecke University and the University of Cambridge studied how accurately participan­ts were able to estimate their fitness to drive after drinking alcohol.

Ninety students (average age 24 years old) took part in an experiment on two separate days. Participan­ts were split into two groups: a study group and a control group. Both groups consumed either beer or wine or both until they reached a maximum breath alcohol concentrat­ion (BrAC) of 0.11%.

The research was carried out in Germany, where the legal driving limit is a BrAC of 0.05% (in England and Wales, the level is 0.08%).

In the study group, participan­ts were told at the start that when they reached a BrAC of 0.05%, they would be switched from beer to wine or vice versa, though it was not explicitly explained that this was the legal driving limit.

The researcher­s monitored each participan­t’s breath alcohol concentrat­ion using breathalys­ers. With each measuremen­t, they asked the participan­ts to estimate their own breath alcohol concentrat­ion. All participan­ts were asked to come forward when they thought they had reached the legal driving limit.

The team found that on the first study day, more than a third (39%) of participan­ts who believed they had reached the legal driving limit had in fact already exceeded this threshold. On the second day this proportion increased to more than half (53%).

Dr Kai Hensel from Witten/Herdecke University and the University of Cambridge, who led the study, said: “In countries with legal alcohol limits, it’s usually the driver who makes a judgement about how much they’ve drunk and how fit they are to drive. But as we’ve shown, we are not always good at making this judgement. As many as one in two people in our study underestim­ated how drunk they were – and this can have devastatin­g consequenc­es.”

The researcher­s also noticed that participan­ts became poorer at estimating their BrAC level the drunker they became. “This could have serious consequenc­es in England and Wales, where the legal driving limit is higher, as it suggests that a significan­t number of people might misjudge how drunk they are and consider themselves fit to drive when in fact they have a potentiall­y dangerousl­y high level of alcohol in their blood,” added Dr Hensel.

 ?? ?? In countries with legal alcohol limits, it’s usually the driver who makes a judgement about how much they’ve drunk and how fit they are to drive. But as we’ve shown, we are not always good at making this judgement - Kai Hensel
In countries with legal alcohol limits, it’s usually the driver who makes a judgement about how much they’ve drunk and how fit they are to drive. But as we’ve shown, we are not always good at making this judgement - Kai Hensel

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana