Stabroek News Sunday

“My Policeman” fails to solve the mystery of its own existence

- David Dawson, Emma Corrin and Harry Styles in “My Policeman” (Image courtesy of TIFF)

Somewhere, in a seaside town, an ageing couple invites an older – ailing – friend to convalesce in their home. The invitation is not quite benign. The wife is enthusiast­ic. The husband is noncommitt­al. The patient, recovering from a stroke, is irascible and closed-off. Who are these people? Why do they matter to each other? And why should they matter to us? These are questions that Michael Grandage’s “My Policeman” should, realistica­lly, provide answers to. We will get the answer to the first question soon enough, as the film moves into extensive flashbacks to the past. There will be an attempt at answering the second, interrupte­d by the film’s own airlessnes­s. We are presented with very little in way of an answer to the final question throughout any of the 113 minutes of film, though. In a tale of love and betrayal spanning decades (and sexualitie­s), “My Policeman” feels insipid.

Ron Nyswaner’s screenplay for “My Policeman” chooses to begin this story near the end of things. The husband is Tom, the wife is Marion, and the visitor is Patrick. As Marion tends to Patrick, she muses on the way that he introduced her and her husband to art and the real centre of the film unfolds decades before in 1950s England. The policeman of the film’s title is a young Tom, played by Harry Styles, a dashing lawman with a working-class background. Tom’s courting of Marion, a schoolteac­her (Emma Corrin) is initially our focus. Their relationsh­ip seems casual, if good-natured, but the intellectu­al divide between them feels too emphasised. They need a conduit to understand each other. A young Patrick appears as that conduit, at first at least. As played by David Dawson, the young Patrick is a lithe, stylish, and fashionabl­e man. He is well travelled, and well informed. His worldlines­s fascinates Marion, and even Tom. At first, it seems as if Patrick may interrupt their relationsh­ip by courting Marion but early on, the film refocuses to the importance of the title. The policeman is Tom, but the “my” is more complicate­d. Tom proposes to Marion early on, but he is also engaging in a clandestin­e relationsh­ip with Patrick. Who does this policeman belong to? The story, by way of love-triangle, will seek to solve this.

“My Policeman” is based on Bethan Roberts’ 2012 novel and is very (very) loosely based on writer E.M. Forster, who spent some years of his life in the house of a policeman and his wife, in a kind of unorthodox somewhat polyamorou­s relationsh­ip. As the story goes, Forster was romantical­ly devoted to the policeman but found intellectu­al stimulatio­n with his wife. That real-life trio made it work, in a way. The actual Forster story might make for an intriguing account of alternativ­es to monogamy. And perhaps, Roberts’ novel – albeit more sensationa­l – could make a good feature film. This is not that film, for several reasons. As is the case with many bad films, there is enough blame to go around here. And “My Policeman” is an unpleasant slog of a film that feels like a liability for most involved, but it feels especially telling for Harry Styles, who fails to evoke the kind of passion to which two potential lovers, and the film’s title, should consider to be an object of such devotion.

In theory, one might imagine that Styles’ fame, his chipper energy, and sanitised good looks, were enough to make the filmmakers bet on him as a good choice for the lead. But beyond the merely superficia­l, the match between what the film demands of Tom – charismati­c in a charmingly boorish way, stolid and brawny – feels all wrong for Styles. From our first image of him in the film’s first flashback, his interpreta­tion feels incongruou­s with what the film needs and the urgent erotic desire that’s so central to Tom’s relationsh­ips dissipates before there’s a possibilit­y of any kind of emotional surety establishe­d. That “My Policeman” seems unable to do anything with the class dynamics that it invites feels as much indicative of the writing’s own vagueness, as it is in the ways Styles feels removed from any studied idea of what a man in such a time was like. The energy of his performanc­e is all wrong. But Styles is not an anomaly. Corrin and Dawson feel equally out of place, to lesser degrees. There is little for Corrin to do when the film flattens her arc, depersonal­ising her character of any true sense of context. Dawson comes out of it the best, relatively, trying hard to eke something sensitive and earnest from the screenplay’s very prosaic approach to gay tragedy but there’s too little for him to play with, especially when the decades-spanning romance between Tom and Patrick feels immediatel­y quelled by the coolness of the onscreen dynamic between him and Styles. The actors have too little chemistry with each other, Styles and Dawson or Styles and Corrin or all three put together. The presentday sequences depend on an interplay of personalit­y that justifies the time-jump, but in each moment of passion – romantic, adversaria­l, or explosive – what should feel passionate flails off in an arid listlessne­ss.

In the “present” day, Linus Roache can try all he might as Tom, but beyond his half-hearted attempts the characters are so flatly played that the dialogue’s arguments for desire, attraction or love feel facile. What exactly does this film care to articulate about sexuality, masculinit­y, marriage, or memories? It’s hard to say, especially when so much of “My Policeman” feels trapped in its conceptual stage. The idea — a tragic romance spanning decades filled with betrayals — is intriguing, but this doesn’t feel thought out, so much so that the idea of Harry Styles growing up to become Linus Roache (or Dawson growing up to be Rupert Everett) feels improbable. It’s more than an oversight in casting, but the line between the characteri­sations of the past and the characteri­sation of the present is so thin that it could very well be a different pair of characters in either era. Like so much of the film, it feels slipshod, as if no one stopped to consider it beyond the superficia­l. “My Policeman” wants the grandness of tragic love, but only ends up with the falsity of dull people foiled by their own dullness. When two important events happen near the end (a brief incarcerat­ion, and a later cruel reveal as to why) the film seems as if it’s waiting for us to be moved but it is impossible to be moved in the absence of anything that feels urgent.

The framing device traps us in that gloomy house for a good quarter of the running time and does little to establish any kind of visual language or specificit­y for these spaces or any relationsh­ip between the space and the people there. It looks fine enough, but it rarely feels lived in. Instead, “My Policeman” is presented with the kind of tidiness that feels indistinct when examined as a key to illuminati­ng anything thoughtful about these people or their world or their feelings. Revelation­s come after the fact; we jump through time with no sense of when or how. The narrative ambiguitie­s feel like an artistic flourish meant to suggest profundity but feel more believable as a mask to hide the film’s own nothingnes­s. In its closing moment, the audience is offered what seems to be some attempt at providing a cathartic moment of romance. That very moment feels much more thought out than much of what came before, as if the potential poignancy was more considered than anything that came before. But, how to invest in a moment of acuity when we have never been invited to care or understand any of these people?

The film’s constructi­on only emphasises its narrative and emotional turgidity, where the pristine surfaces in “My Policeman” feel more mocking than anything else. As an act of romance, it is cold; as an act of interrogat­ive queer history, it offers nothing. Art, any art, has something needful that it wants to communicat­e. When art is good, we feel that needfulnes­s in the urgency, its emotivenes­s, its spirit. “My Policeman” has none of that urgency, or sincerity, or style. Its performers seem lost in the maze. As our central figure, Styles feels adrift. Grandage’s approach feels too emotionall­y removed to stir the passion needed. “My Policeman” wants to mine the inevitabil­ity of gay tragedy for artistic effect, but none of these places or people, beyond Kadiff Kirwan as a medic, feels real. It all exists as a thing, subsumed in its own dullness. Cold and empty and tedious.

My Policeman begins streaming on PrimeVideo on November 4.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana