ALL-ROUND REFORM
MAIN POINTS ON REFORM AND OPENING UP FROMM THE COMMUNIQUE RELEASED ON NOV 12, 2013
Much has come from the third plenum regarding the management of Stateowned assets, particularly State-owned enterprises. The reforms are not going to wipe SOEs out of existence, however. The communique said China’s basic economic system is one that depends on public ownership as its main body but allows for the prosperity of various ownerships. Both public and nonpublic ownerships are important components, it said. Regarding public ownership, represented mainly by SOEs, it said China will continue to strengthen their vigor, their power of self-control, and their influence. For nonpublic sector ownership, such as the millions of privately held small enterprises, the communique said China will provide ample room for their vitality and creativity. In the meantime, it said, due protection will be provided to cover property rights, to develop a mixed economy (a mix of public and private ownership), to push for a modern enterprise system in SOEs, and to support the healthy development of nonpublic enterprises.
The third plenum communique did not mention the word monopoly once. However, one of the most frequently mentioned words was “market”. It featured 22 times. “Building a unified but open, orderly and competitive market system will guarantee the market plays a decisive role in the allocation of resources” in society, it said. On this basis, autonomous management and fair competition can be made possible as well as consumers’ free choice and the free flow of goods and services. A major effort is to be made toward this goal, and to knock down the internal barriers holding back progress in efficiency and fairness. The leadership also called for the further liberation of people’s minds and society’s productivity by removing defects in all aspects of the system. The process will be quickened in economic structural reform, to build a more efficient, equitable and more sustainable economy, the communique said.
China must accelerate construction of a new agricultural management system and give farmers more proprietary rights, to realize the equal exchange of production factors, achieve a fair allocation of public resources between urban and rural areas, and promote healthy urbanization, the communique said. Granting farmers overdue property rights of collective land is a breakthrough, said Pan Jiahua, a researcher on urbanization with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, who explained that a land-transfer market becomes conceivable once farmers’ proprietary rights are confirmed. This milestone will bring concrete benefits to farmers, lay a foundation for modern agriculture, and pressure local governments to end their reliance on land transfers for large profits, he said. Li Tie, a researcher on city development with the National Development and Reform Commission, said: “Only by removing institutional restrictions hindering the free flow of economic factors can the potential of healthy urbanization really be released.”
China’s financial market system will be improved, according to the communique. Guo Jianguang, a professor at the Central University of Finance and Economics, said the market, rather than the government, is likely to play a more important role in deciding China’s exchange and interest rates. As an effective measure to control the macroeconomy, the exchange and interest rates have long been tightly regulated, he said. China started to allow banks to decide their own lending rates in July, although deposit rates are still fixed by the central bank. The limit on the deposit interest rate should be lifted step by step to benefit the public, Guo said. A deposit insurance system should be established as soon as possible to prevent banks from malicious competition, he added.
Support will be given to ensure the healthy development of the nonpublic economy, the communique said. Mei Xingbao, an external supervisor for the Bank of China, said a multilayered capital market is likely to be cultivated with more private capital. Competition will be introduced to improve the efficiency of Stateowned banks, which have already accumulated large amounts of wealth through financing government-funded projects, he said. He said it is expected to become easier for small and medium-sized enterprises to get loans from banking agencies after competition is introduced. State-owned banks tend to resist reform because they have got used to earning money easily through governmentfunded projects, Mei added.
Ascientific fiscal and taxation system is an institutional guarantee to optimize resource allocation, protect the integrity of the market, safeguard social fairness and maintain China’s long-term peace and stability, the communique said. “Although there are few details, this part should contain simplification of tax items and a new tax base for local governments,” according to Rui Meng, a professor of finance and accounting at the China Europe International Business School. “Local governments should no longer rely on increment (land transfers) and should shift toward inventory (property tax).” Minister of Finance Lou Jiwei has previously promised to expand trials of a property tax, while reform of the consumption tax is also in sight. The resource tax on coal and metals, which had been levied by volume, will be calculated on a price basis, he said. “These three aspects should be part of the tax reform,” Rui added.
The communique said: “we must attach importance to legislation, explicitly clarify the duties of governments at various levels ...” Rui Meng, a professor of finance and accounting at the China Europe International Business School, said he believes the central government will withdraw some expenditure duties. “Previous statements only stressed local government ‘initiatives’, but this reform is aimed at the long-discussed disparity between local government revenue and spending responsibilities,” he said. “This is a call for curbing reckless borrowing,” he continued. “Too often, local governments have invested heavily in redundant projects with very low returns. They should leave most investments — infrastructure, for example — to the market, thus reducing low efficiency and rent-seeking in these activities.” Curbing reckless borrowing also requires a transparent budget system, he said.
While last year’s 18th CPC National Congress called for building an “ecological civilization”, this year’s third plenum discussed how to make it happen. To build a beautiful China, the country must improve the system of land development, conservation of resources and environmental protection, the communique said. A bottom line for ecological protection should be established, it said. China must improve the system of property rights for natural resources and better regulate the use of those recourses. The country should also establish a system of compensation for the use of natural resources and the subsequent impact on the ecosystem. “It is no longer a concept, but a workable plan with the same weight as economic and market development, and will involve participation across all dimensions — political, social, and cultural,” said Zhang Xiaode, a professor at the Chinese Academy of Governance who specializes in economic and ecological civilization.
The communique points out that to better adjust to the new realities of economic globalization, China must accelerate the pace of openingup, both internally and in terms of the outside world. The country will lower the thresholds for investment, accelerate the construction of free trade zones, and boost opening-up in inland and coastal areas. Huang Hai, vice-president of the China Association of Trade in Services, said relaxing the investment barriers and accelerating the construction of free trade zones are fundamental changes. “Take foreign investors, for example, previously they were only allowed to invest in the fields and projects stipulated in the Catalogue of Foreign Investment Industries. However, under the new regulations in the Shanghai Free Trade Zone, they can invest in a wider range of fields,” said Huang. Businesses have more rights and receive an improved service in the new free trade zone. If the pilot in Shanghai is successful, it may be expanded nationwide, he added.
The communique said China will strive to make social welfare fairer and more sustainable. Reform of social affairs is vital to guarantee all citizens enjoy the fruits of China’s development, it said. Guan Xinping, director of the department of social work and social policy at Nankai University, said China has almost met the goal of universal social welfare coverage for its urban and rural populations, but a great disparity still exists among different professions and regions. “The system is fragmented, as different people enjoy different levels of welfare,” he said. “It’s vital for the government to tackle the disparity and enable people to enjoy equal welfare.” He added that China’s social welfare system should also be more sustainable, to cope with the potential risks from an aging population and inflation in the long run.
According to the communique, China’s urbanrural structure is the main obstacle restricting the integrated development of cities and the countryside. “We must develop a new type of integrated, mutually beneficial relationships between industry and agriculture, city and countryside, under which industry should promote agricultural development, and the city should promote progress in the countryside, to let farmers have equal chance to take part in modernization and share the fruits of modernity,” it said. Chen Xiwen, a researcher into agricultural development with the CPC Central Committee’s Leading Group of Countryside Work, told media it is “absolutely necessary and practical” to integrate the city and countryside, and industry and agriculture, to improve farmers’ livelihoods and fill the gaps in the dual structure. “After being nurtured by farmers, industry and development in the cities should serve agriculture and the countryside in return,” he said.
The communique says that to construct a socialist cultural power and strengthen China’s soft power, the country will further deepen cultural restructuring. China will improve the cultural management system, establish a modern cultural market system, build a modern public cultural service system, and further open the cultural market. In terms of cultural development, the government has already made some changes. “As the economy grows, the market will become the major provider of cultural consumer goods and channels for the public. Comparatively, public services will switch to the fundamental role. As a result, we need to build and perfect the cultural market system,” said Tuo Zuhai, deputy director of the Cultural Market Division at the Ministry of Culture.