China Daily

A representa­tion of a tree is the centerpiec­e of the closing ceremony of the Rio Olympics on Sunday. Special Coverage: Four pages dedicated to the latest developmen­ts in Rio

-

If you tuned into the Olympics, whether on television or your smartphone, then you belong to a multi-billion dollar club of 5 billion people.

As the Internatio­nal Olympic Committee launches its Olympic Channel, here are five things to know about the biggest broadcasti­ng operation on the planet, a combinatio­n of technology and business being raised by the digital revolution to ever-new levels.

Broadcasti­ng Bolt

From New York to Tokyo and Buenos Aires to London, people all over the world tuned in for the few seconds it took Jamaica’s Usain Bolt to run the 100m.

To make that happen, the signal was sent by the Olympic Broadcasti­ng Services, which is under the control of the Internatio­nal Olympic Committee, and sent to four satellites, then beamed back down.

More than 7,000 technician­s in blue T-shirts worked in a center resembling mission control, with the walls covered in screens, to deliver footage from the Games filmed by 1,200 camera operators. More than 7,000 hours of content were beamed around the world.

$3.5 billion business

The Olympics is about money as much as sport and one major exchange of money is in selling broadcast rights.

The rights holders, as they are known, pay a premium for exclusive transmissi­on of the Games. Non-rights holders are not even allowed to bring cameras into Olympic competitio­n sites.

Although this exclusivit­y is shared among many different outlets, each tailors the content to its local market.

TV channels in Brazil or China or Jamaica provide a very different experience, focusing on their own country’s athletes and favored sports to ensure a maximum audience — and maximum price tag for commercial­s run alongside.

“Revenue for transmissi­on rights keeps going up. At Rio, it came to more than $3.5 billion,” said Yiannis Exarchos, CEO of Olympic broadcasti­ng.

That business, plus sponsorshi­p, oils the financial wheels of the huge sporting extravagan­za. About 9 percent of the rights revenues go to the IOC and the rest to internatio­nal sporting federation­s and national Olympic committees.

“The world of sport, other than in a few very profitable discipline­s, would have a lot of difficulty to survive without this,” Exarchos said.

Digital Olympics

Exarchos said Rio was the first internet Games, where online viewership was “as big a factor as television.”

After four days of competitio­n, more people had watched Olympic images online than during the entire Olympics in London four years ago.

IOC President Thomas Bach said NBC, which owns the US broadcast rights, had recorded more than 2.25 billion live stream minutes on its website.

The digital revolution, in which tablets, cell phones and computers take on TV, once seemed a big threat to the traditiona­l broadcaste­rs.

However, Exarchos said things are settling down.

“Today, most broadcaste­rs have their own digital platforms and we see that they’re using them to bring the public to their traditiona­l channels. Digital feeds traditiona­l TV and vice versa,” he said.

The newer factor is the “very aggressive emergence of some media, especially on social networks, that are completely changing the environmen­t and represent a risk to traditiona­l media,” he said.

Future Games

Rio was used as a test ground for future Olympics.

Japan’s NHK channel ran tests in the 8K format, which is 16 times clearer than today’s HD images. On a cinema screen the 100m race appeared in incredibly sharp definition, giving the viewer the sensation of being there.

Virtual reality technology is also under developmen­t. A prototype in which special glasses were linked to a network of cameras in the Olympic swimming pool gave viewers the ability to see something different with a turn of the head, as if they were seated in the arena.

In a few years it is expected that the goggles will put the viewers into the center of the action without leaving their armchairs.

Empty stadiums?

If broadcast technology gets that good, who will go through the expense and hassle of taking a plane and buying tickets to attend the Games?

Will athletes of the future compete in empty stadiums?

“No,” Exarchos said. “Nothing replaces the emotion of being there.”

In fact, television viewers also want spectators in the shot — they are part of the show.

“The half-empty stadiums we saw at times in Rio are the worst thing you can have on screen,” Exarchos said.

“I’m in favor of smaller stadiums that are filled to capacity.”

 ?? LEONHARD FOEGER / REUTERS ??
LEONHARD FOEGER / REUTERS

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Hong Kong