China Daily

Why is it insurrecti­on in US and just protest in HK?

- Richard Cullen The author is a visiting professor in the Faculty of Law, the University of Hong Kong. The views do not necessaril­y reflect those of China Daily.

Much of the world was riveted by scenes of a riotous mob of Americans storming the Capitol in Washington on Jan 6. Militant protesters, some armed, arrived in their thousands to support Donald Trump’s shameless claim that he had been robbed of victory in the presidenti­al election and to stop the formal counting of state submitted, electoral college votes by a joint session of Congress.

Joe Biden, then president-elect and now the 46th president of the United States, told America and the world that, “It is an insurrecti­on. It is an assault on the rule of law.” He added that: “This is not dissent, it’s disorder. It borders on sedition,” and they are domestic terrorists who should be prosecuted.

The National Geographic magazine agreed, headlining its report: “An American Insurrecti­on”. Leading Western media outlets such as BBC, CNN, The Guardian (which headlined Jan 6 as “Insurrecti­on Day”) and The Washington Post graphicall­y described and roundly condemned the rioting mob assaulting the Capitol.

These comments and reports aptly captured the fundamenta­lly serious nature of what had happened: Here was a dangerous threat to the US’ very constituti­onal order. None of these leading commentato­rs spoke of any possible justificat­ions for this behavior. Methodical­ly banished from considerat­ion was any validation of what had unfolded as demonstrat­ing the right to assembly, free expression or civil disobedien­ce for a political cause. Fierce calls for the applicatio­n of resolute state force to put a stop to the politics of violence and fear so frightenin­gly on display, soon followed.

Leading Democrat politician and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, soon after, moved to impeach Trump (again) on a charge of “incitement to insurrecti­on”. She said Trump was “unhinged”.

Inevitably, what has happened in Washington gives cause to reflect on the insurrecti­on we experience­d in Hong Kong for almost a year in 2019.

A remarkable new book by Nury Vittachi, The Other Side of the Story: A Secret War in Hong Kong, provides a distinctly thorough and chilling, diarystyle, review of Hong Kong’s extended insurgency. In chapter 9, “Setting Up The Police”, Vittachi provides a detailed review of the events of June 12, 2019, based on eyewitness testimony and extensive interviews.

This first major political riot was not just well organized, it was also well orchestrat­ed. For example, the police were purposeful­ly drawn into certain arrest procedures to show them in the worst light for the benefit of members of the internatio­nal media, who were looking for such footage. Vittachi notes, acutely, that: “A well-known strategy of internatio­nal protest is to dehumanize the police and ascribe all wrongdoing to them. This is precisely what was happening in Hong Kong.”

Remember, too, that this was a protest-riot deliberate­ly planned to stop the Legislativ­e Council, a core part of the constituti­onal structure in the Hong Kong Special Administra­tive Region, actually convening to engage in its primary purpose: legislatin­g. This furious protest stopped the LegCo from operating. Here was a far more effective assault on a legislatur­e than that recently seen in Washington, where Congress reconvened shortly after the rioters were removed from the Capitol building and confirmed Biden as the next president of the US.

Following this energetic first mugging of Hong Kong’s constituti­onal order, a still more hard-line mob comprehens­ively vandalized the LegCo building less than three weeks later on July 1, rendering it unusable for three months until about HK$50 million ($6.4 million) was spent on repairs.

The widest variety of leading internatio­nal commentato­rs smoothed over the July 1 attack on the LegCo building. Few, if any, talked, as they have so readily since Jan 6, of insurrecti­on, terrorism or an assault on the rule of law. The narrative which emerged saw July 1, at most, as an unfortunat­e lapse (possibly encouraged by the police) within an otherwise heroic struggle for political reform.

Not surprising­ly — but still extraordin­arily — the Economist said: “The (Washington) mayhem is unlike any in living memory.” Some memory: bearing in mind not just Hong Kong but the shocking assaults on the Russian and Indian parliament­s in 1993 and 2001, respective­ly.

Of course, the mob supporting Trump also seeks political reform, tailor-made to their demands. One of the leading rioters at the Capitol provocativ­ely compared his “civil disobedien­ce” to that of Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr.

Here is a short thought experiment: What if Washington were to be subject, not just to this one horrendous day of rioting at the Capitol, but to more than six months of violent political upheaval from one end of the city to the other?

Imagine rioting that would constantly trash the fine Washington subway system and wreck a series of its excellent universiti­es. If one day’s horrific intimidati­on is an insurrecti­on then how to describe Hong Kong’s ferocious 2019 reality systematic­ally transplant­ed to the US capital: a new civil war, perhaps?

Here is a short thought experiment: What if Washington were to be subject, not just to this one horrendous day of rioting at the Capitol, but to more than six months of violent political upheaval from one end of the city to the other?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Hong Kong