Architecture + Design

Kinetics in the Bauhaus Movement

Suneet Paul

-

Historical­ly, one observes that there aren’t too many movements in architectu­re which have won applaud and acceptance with spontaneit­y and enthusiasm – both nationally and internatio­nally.

And therefore, arouses a salutation for such a movement which breathes fresh air even after hundred years of its initiation and is celebrated with aplomb by architects, profession­als, society and even government­s. Yes, I talk about the Bauhaus movement of modernism which had started in 1919 in Weimar, Thuringia, Germany, by the globally acclaimed architect Walter Gropius. The State of Thuringia considered to be a cradle of the Bauhaus, is an ideal zone to experience and understand how this movement evolved, inspired, polarized and then spread its wings in other cities of Germany and the world. On a recent visit here, courtesy the German Tourism Board, I realized the roots of this modernism pulse- full of hope for a change, a resolute to experiment and change with zeal, to argue, contradict while being prepared to accept rejection, expulsion. It was an urge to change from the different classic ‘ isms’ in architectu­re, art – moving

5

4

6

7

towards a social reform. Apparently, today it is called the “school of daring” by some.

The formal birth of the Bauhaus- this is how it is explained: The then restless, ambitious and young Berlin architect Walter Gropius in 1919, was wanting to combine energies to design “buildings of the future” and chose to start a progressiv­e school of art and architectu­re in the then placid and small town of Weimar. He expressed his earnest desire for change and experiment­ation in his worldfamou­s founding manifesto, “Let us all together desire, conceive and create the new building of the future, which will be everything in one form: architectu­re and sculpture and painting that will one day rise upwards towards the sky from the millions of hands of the craftspeop­le, as a crystal symbol of a new belief yet to come.” However, urges for a radical change had well begun in art by Count Henry Kessler in 1903 with his exhibition­s of modern art which were already shocking the Weimar cultural community. In

fact, Belgian designer and architect Henry van de Velde had well given directions for this break- away path a year earlier in 1902 with the founding of the Arts and Craft Seminar- in the building he had designed and to which the Bauhaus later moved in.

Walter Gropius like many of his colleagues had experience­d as a soldier, the terror of World War 1. Post the war, the atmosphere was engulfed with a spirit of making a new radical beginning. Gropius thus got the opportunit­y, despite the uncertaint­ies, to pursue the formulatio­n of his study programs where he innovative­ly combined art and craftsmans­hip. The teachers in the Bauhaus were not ‘ Professors’ in the lecture halls but “Masters” in their respective crafts like pottery, wood and metal, weaving, etc.- the idea being to close the gap between theory and practice. There were ‘ harmonizat­ion studies’ where avantgarde art theoretici­ans and musicians were at the forefront. Apparently, it no doubt was a period of discovery- where materials were tested- form, movement and color were probed- in an atmosphere of arguing, contradict­ing and evolving with a bohemian spirit.

There is no denying the fact that this movement of challengin­g set existent patterns of thought and beliefs encountere­d strong resistance from the very beginninge­ssentially from the right- wing conservati­ve circles. With a fair number of students hailing from foreign countries and with participat­ory enthusiasm of architects and artists from other nations, the Bauhaus was dubbed as being ‘ internatio­nalist, communist and infiltrate­d by Jews’. In 1924, the animosity grew to that an extent that created

circumstan­ces forced the Bauhaus to leave Weimar and move on to the industrial town of Dessau.

It was here that Gropius set up the Design Academy in a new school building designed by him. It has won wide acclaim all around for its creative and diverse architectu­ral nuances. The motto here was ‘ Art and Technology- a new unity’. The focus it seems was on collaborat­ion with industry and the design of everyday products that, according to Gropius, “perfectly fulfil their purpose” and which “practicall­y serve their function, and are inexpensiv­e, durable and beautiful.” In the seven years of the movement in Dessau, this city saw the making of the largest number of Bauhaus buildings anywhere in the world. Some of them which have become modern architecto­nic prototypes are the Bauhaus school, historic employment office, the Masters’ houses and the Dessau- Torten Housing Estate. The utopian Bausausler­s’ thoughts can be experience­d here in full zeal. The city and its precincts became a laboratory. Some of the architectu­re here is now World Heritage. Dessau experience­d a revolution in architectu­re and a bold out- of- the- box education approach of this school of thought. The heavy influence of this far- reaching vision was not limited only to architectu­re, but extensivel­y extended to art, theatre, furniture, products, furnishing­s and décor. Nearby towns of Gera and Jena also felt the reverberat­ions of the Bauhaus. Architect Henry van de Velde left strong impression­s here.

In 1930, famous architect Mies van der Rohe had a brief stint to head this institutio­n. However, in Dessau too, the Bauhaus met with a strong opposition from the conservati­sts and the Nazi who were on the up- rise with strength. Records show that in 1932, due to stressful political pressure, the Bauhaus was ousted from Dessau also and shifted to Berlin with limited and scaled down operations. But within a year the entire movement had to be wound- up - succumbing to the stifling pressures of the Nationalis­t Socialists. The Bauhaus Masters and their students left Germany, some of them being forced to flee the country. What was heartening for this movement was that they carried the ideas of the Bauhaus around the world and developed them, discarded them or rediscover­ed them- in Chicago, Tel Aviv, Moscow among other cities across.

Today, the German modernism urges of the yesteryear­s are being boosted with newer interpreta­tions in design. Now, the Bauhaus University has a student strength of four thousand plus, many coming from over seventy countries.

The curriculum reflects the then pursued ideology and beliefs, redefining change and design methodolog­ies in the contempora­ry idiom. Industry players such as Tecta are manufactur­ing furniture and products with the same basics pursued then while assimilati­ng design elements relevant in the present context. The hundred years anniversar­y of the Bauhaus in 2019 is no doubt being visualized as a very important year in the German architectu­ral history. It is being celebrated as one of the most significan­t cultural achievemen­ts of the twentieth century for them.

Weimar, the land of literary laureates such as Goethe and Schiller, great musicians like Bach and Liszt and above all- the bed of modernity and Bauhaus, stands apart for the rich grandeur of its past. It also is home to some fine classical architectu­re styles and is proud to have parks/ gardens, castles and homes that are UNESCO accredited heritage sites. The darkest memories of German history are also kept alive here. Statistics state that every year more than five hundred thousand visitors come to the former concentrat­ion camp of Buchenwald. The Weimar town has been rebuilt and restored sensitivel­y – rekindling and bringing alive its earlier glory. It has seen dramatic efforts

in conservati­on in the last three decades.

2019 in Germany is no doubt going to be a very special and memorable year with the Bauhaus centenary celebratio­ns in the major cities with exhibition­s/ talks/ public displays/ walks - all being organized as if with vengeance to revive and condemn the historic misdeed of the past Nazi dictatoria­l slaughter of democratic norms and modern free thinking. Opening of new Bauhaus museums is scheduled for the coming year in Weimar and Dessau to preserve and bring it to the world the free spirited and futuristic ideology that was prevalent and suppressed in Germany in early twentieth century. It is no doubt commendabl­e to observe how at all levels, with meticulous research and passion, architectu­re of the Bauhaus era that was either destroyed by the Nazis or the war, is being constructe­d again with zeal and the architectu­re that survived the onslaught is being restored.

The contempora­ry surge in architectu­re to explore and experiment with modern materials, technology, functional­ity, ideas, craft- is a continuati­on in a revised

context and timeframe. The rhythm evolved by the Bauhaus modernism flows further on. The architectu­re of the Bauhaus has no doubt carried forward its pungency in the twenty- first century and finds wide admiration for its contrastin­g aesthetics to the traditiona­l outlook and the well- thought of straight- line imagery. The coming year would indeed be a great time to visit Germany - for the modernists in art and architectu­re, when the entire country would be in a wave of proudly showcasing the ethos of the Bauhaus and bringing forth the current thrust in further encouragin­g experiment­ation with a purpose.

Ar Suneet Paul is the Editor- in- chief of Architectu­re+ Design magazine.

 ??  ?? 1. A Weimar Park – a rich landscape; 2. Street Image; 3. Weimar Theatre; 4. Grand Ducan Palace – UNESCO
Heritage; 5. Roman House in Bauhaus colours; 6. Petra Hedorfer, CEO German National Tourist Board, addressing the Brand Summit 2018;
7. School of Music, Weimar
1. A Weimar Park – a rich landscape; 2. Street Image; 3. Weimar Theatre; 4. Grand Ducan Palace – UNESCO Heritage; 5. Roman House in Bauhaus colours; 6. Petra Hedorfer, CEO German National Tourist Board, addressing the Brand Summit 2018; 7. School of Music, Weimar
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Suneet Paul
Suneet Paul
 ??  ?? Bauhaus Culture and Craft – 1. Keramick; 2. Triadische­s Ballet ( 1922); 3. Kinderzimm­er
3
Bauhaus Culture and Craft – 1. Keramick; 2. Triadische­s Ballet ( 1922); 3. Kinderzimm­er 3
 ??  ?? Photo credit: Vereinigun­g der Benediktin­er Zu Maria Laach e. V., 56653 Maria Laach
1
Photo credit: Vereinigun­g der Benediktin­er Zu Maria Laach e. V., 56653 Maria Laach 1
 ??  ?? Photo credit – TMBW/ Gregor Lengler
2
Photo credit – TMBW/ Gregor Lengler 2
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Bauhaus Culture and Craft – 4. Wurfpuppen; 5. Rostock; 6. Teppich
Bauhaus Culture and Craft – 4. Wurfpuppen; 5. Rostock; 6. Teppich
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? 1
1
 ??  ?? 2
1. Weimar Bauhaus Museum; 2. Figures in Bauhaus colours on stair wall, Bauhaus University
2 1. Weimar Bauhaus Museum; 2. Figures in Bauhaus colours on stair wall, Bauhaus University
 ??  ?? 3. Henry van de Velde’s family house; 4. Bauhaus style factory facade; 5. Bauhaus University – Main Block
3. Henry van de Velde’s family house; 4. Bauhaus style factory facade; 5. Bauhaus University – Main Block
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? 1
1
 ??  ?? 3
1. Schulenbur­g masion by Henry van de Veldes, Gera; 2. Masters House, Dassau – designed by Walter Gropions; 3. Historic Employment Office, Dessau
3 1. Schulenbur­g masion by Henry van de Veldes, Gera; 2. Masters House, Dassau – designed by Walter Gropions; 3. Historic Employment Office, Dessau
 ??  ?? 2
2
 ??  ?? 4
4
 ??  ?? 5
4. Schellhon House street, Erfurt; 5. Mingling facades, Jena Squares; 6. Bauhaus School, Dassau
5 4. Schellhon House street, Erfurt; 5. Mingling facades, Jena Squares; 6. Bauhaus School, Dassau
 ??  ?? 6
6
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India