Business Standard

Take consultant­s on rolls or foreclose contracts, says NSE pay panel WRONG COUNSEL

- N SUNDARESHA SUBRAMANIA­N New Delhi, 3 January

The Nomination and Remunerati­on Committee (NRC) of the National Stock Exchange (NSE) has asked the bourse to absorb consultant­s as employees based on criteria such as requiremen­ts and suitabilit­y or end their contracts at the earliest. The direction was given by the newly constitute­d four-member NRC in November. The move could have an impact on the contracts of the consultant­s currently engaged by the bourse and how it deals with the work of such nature in the future. Some contracts have been foreclosed after this, according to people in the know.

“The Nomination and Remunerati­on Committee of our Board was at its meeting dated November 9, 2016 advised that consultant­s with responsibi­lities be considered for absorption as employees after taking into considerat­ion the current and future requiremen­ts, suitabilit­y, fitment, feedback, performanc­es, age, etc or the consultanc­y contract be foreclosed as soon as possible,” the bourse said in its draft red herring prospectus (DRHP) filed last week. The panel is now headed by public interest director (PID) Dinesh Kanabar and | Sebi wrote to NSE board in September to address

concerns raised in anonymous letters | On November 9, Nomination and Remunerati­on

committee was reconstitu­ted | It recommende­d that consultant­s be absorbed or

contracts foreclosed included chairman Ashok Chawla, former chief Ravi Narain and TV Mohandas Pai (also PID) as its members.

The disclosure did not explain what “consultant with responsibi­lities” covered. The move came weeks after Anand Subramania­n, the consultant and adviser to the then managing director Chitra Ramkrishna, foreclosed his own consultanc­y without attributin­g any reason.

Subramania­n’s appointmen­t as a consultant and later re-designatio­n as group operating officer and his perceived proximity to the top management had become a subject of criticism. There were reports of anonymous letters alleging irregulari­ties and corporate governance concerns citing his high remunerati­on.

According to the DRHP, the bourse’s spend on “IT management and consultanc­y charges” went up from ~3.2 crore in FY14 to ~9.07 crore in FY15. For FY16, the figure stood at ~6.82 crore while in the first half of FY17, this shrank to ~76 lakh.

The DRHP confirmed these anonymous letters and the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) directives based on these in September. The regulator wanted to ensure there was no conflict of interest.

“Sebi had received anonymous complaints questionin­g the re-designatio­n of Anand Subramania­n as the group operating officer and advisor to our managing director. Sebi, by its letter dated September 15, 2016, advised us to place the complaint letters before our board and to decide whether there has been any violation of code of conduct or principle of avoidance of conflict of interest while appointing Anand Subramania­n...”

Anand Subramania­n has foreclosed his consultanc­y assignment with effect from October 21, 2016 and Sebi has been informed of the same through our email dated December 21, 2016, the bourse said in the DRHP.

As of its last annual report, the NRC comprised Chawla, Narain and was chaired by retired supreme court judge B N Srikrishna, who was a public interest director. Srikrishna’s term ended on August 2. Elsewhere in the DRHP, the bourse talked about various board committees being reconstitu­ted following the induction of new directors, “the Nomination and Remunerati­on Committee was last re-constitute­d by our board on November 9, 2016.”

Not getting Anand Subramania­n’s appointmen­t passed through the NRC was one of the issues raised by the exchange’s secretaria­l audit. In an interview to Business Standard last month, Chawla had confirmed that the matter of irregulari­ties in the appointmen­t was raised by the secretaria­l auditor of the company. “The secretaria­l auditor, from whatever papers were available, had raised some issues. Then presumably, there were some oral discussion­s between senior management and the auditor. And, to some extent they had modified the views from what they had communicat­ed at that point of time. This was all looked at in the recent past,” Chawla had said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India